Rogue1stclass
Muse
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 844
Ha ha. The western politicians are being fooled by the more cunning Asian powers. The Japanese leaders only pretend to be friendly with the U.S.
Ah. The Yellow Menace. How very 1930s of you.
Ha ha. The western politicians are being fooled by the more cunning Asian powers. The Japanese leaders only pretend to be friendly with the U.S.
The clouds should have become totally evaporated before they would even become torn apart! I repeat: the scenario shown in the video is not plausible.
The clouds should have become totally evaporated before they would even become torn apart! I repeat: the scenario shown in the video is not plausible.
If Saudi Arabia descends into turmoil then it might happen. But, believe me, Obama really doesn't want to have to do that. I'm sure he is praying every night that there isn't a revolution in Saudi Arabia. If there is then his options range from bad to terrible. All will entail massive costs and will certainly send the economy into a tailspin.
And...come 2013 we get to watch the inauguration of President Palin.
This is actually a good point. Since clouds and the ocean are both made of the same thing, the ocean would have been destroyed too. Yet the ocean is clearly visible after the explosion.
Why should they evaporate? You will note that the effect of the pressure wave is not to cause evaporation, but quite the opposite - moisture condenses out of the air even where there were previously no clouds. As the wave passes, the air soon returns to approximately the same pressure, temperature and humidity it had before. So the new condensation evaporates again and in areas which previously had no cloud there is again no cloud. In areas where there was the conditions to form cloud, there is still cloud. Very simple.
If you want to claim this is "not plausible" I'm afraid you're going to have to do better, and explain exactly why not.
Shock wave in the ocean, like a tsunami you know, not parting the ocean.![]()
No... the shockwave would have been so powerful it would have torn apart the water molecules, turning them into elemental hydrogen and oxygen which are both gasses at sea level in earths atmosphere. Which would have then floated away. The explosion would have literally blown up the ocean.
One of the fun parts with conspiracy theories is that it allows for some wild speculations. I try to keep it within not too far-fetched limits though.
lol. The ocean water at the detonation area would have turned into water fuel! Imagine billions of tons of hydrogen and oxygen being ignited.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7Fc8kIyMCo
No, you really don't.
No... the hydrogen and oxygen would have been dispersed by the same shockwave that tore apart the molecules. They wouldn't be close enough together to sustain combustion.
Ok, that may be true, I don't know. I will try to get back to the original topic. This atom bomb stuff is too far out.
.The atom bomb hoax theory is pretty extreme. I don't remember how that topic came up.
The west wants to secure oil resources long-term. That means military invasion in the Middle East, Africa etc. Otherwise China will constitute a constant potential future threat, plus the oil producing countries themselves can become a threat if their oil production becomes disturbed. So the western leaders want to put military forces permanently in places where oil resources need to be guarded, both physically and politically.
Yeah! I don't believe the protests in the Muslim countries just spontaneously erupted. Instead they have been planned and orchestrated by western intelligence agencies and the like I suspect.