Since the President of US cannot make that decision I'd say it's a bit silly to say he 'wants' too.
The protest in the east are Shi'ite and the Sunnis have little liking for those 'heretics'.
Yeah, ok I admit I did an attempt of attention whoring with the text 'Obama planning'. What I meant is that the U.S. government and other heavy importers of Saudi oil are planning to invade Saudi Arabia, not really that Obama himself is making those plans.
Obviously not.
Why not invade Canada instead? Invading your neighbor is the budget option.
Why would they keep oil to themselves? Their entire economy is based on them selling it.
Even if Saudi Arabia would not keep the oil to themselves, I think the U.S. government makes a judgment that they MUST invade Saudi Arabia and take control over the oil production to prevent/preempt the risk of having China start making too much oil deals in Saudi Arabia.
The U.S. government and many other governments who are dependent on Saudi oil must be very worried.
Do you make this up in advance of your first post or just ad lib?
Please define "dependent." In 2009, only 10.9% of U.S. crude oil imports came from Saudi Arabia. (In comparison, 21.6% came from Canada and 12.1% came from Mexico.)
True, so the title of the thread is fairly ok after all. If there is some truth to the idea, then it will take some time before it starts to become apparent. First they will have to deal with Libya probably.
Oh! Good point actually. Yet both the Canadian tar sands and the oil in Mexico are safer than the oil in Saudi Arabia. Unless China has started or is planning deals with Mexico!![]()
So clearly we can add economics to the plethora of topics about which you are ill informed.
You're trying too hard.
Clearly a CIA/MI6 managed protest.