• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Khadaffi's Nurse has left him...

I do not think he is doing so well that he can afford to be without the services of anyone loyal to him who can dress a wound.
 
You are all naive fools!

Clearly, Qaddafi had a sex change and impersonated his nurse in order to make his escape. Soon she will join him in exile and they will live an erotic life as sexy lesbians who do freelance espionage. That would be a great TV show!
 
leftysergeant said:
I do not think he is doing so well that he can afford to be without the services of anyone loyal to him who can dress a wound.
Click to expand...

I doubt it makes much difference if his wounds get dressed once he is up in the lamppost.
 
Bill Thompson said:
Define "gong well".

Cutting luxuriates is a good thing in war time.

One could just as easily interpret this as a sign things are going well for him.

Time will tell.

If I did not know any better, I would assume that you were hoping for his demise.
Click to expand...

You have your usual reading comprehension going, I see.

Go back to my post.

See the bolded part of YOUR post.

That seems to say there is a civil war in Libya.

Do you define that as "going well"?
 
Darth Rotor said:
Bill, are you hoping that Qadaffi stays in power?
Click to expand...

Yes, unbelievable as it may sound, Bill is either an avid supporter of the Colonel, or he's chosen to play one on the internet for purposes of yanking as many chains as possible.

Check out his thread on the Green Book, that ridiculous justification for dictatorial rule.
 
TragicMonkey said:
You are all naive fools!

Clearly, Qaddafi had a sex change and impersonated his nurse in order to make his escape. Soon she will join him in exile and they will live an erotic life as sexy lesbians who do freelance espionage. That would be a great TV show!
Click to expand...

All the while completely within the realm of possibility. I will die if such a thing is ever attempted by anyone anywhere.
 
Darth Rotor said:
Bill, are you hoping that Qadaffi stays in power?
Click to expand...

I am neutral on this issue. Are you? If not, why aren't you?

Any involvement in anyway will inflame anti-american feelings in Mid East. I am sure Al Jezeera is just waiting for us to make any move that they can exploit for ratings.
 
Bill Thompson said:
I am neutral on this issue. Are you? If not, why aren't you?
Click to expand...

I am pretty firmly in the "tyrants suck" camp. I'd rather the American military not get involved though. It leads to too much collateral damage and it turns out people don't like us turning their infrastructure into rubble-themed modern art.
 
KingMerv00 said:
I am pretty firmly in the "tyrants suck" camp. I'd rather the American military not get involved though. It leads to too much collateral damage and it turns out people don't like us turning their infrastructure into rubble-themed modern art.
Click to expand...

In another thread I suggested that our policy ought to be "Let 'em play."

General Mattis had some sobering things to tell Congress yesterday about how a No Fly Zone works.

"You have to take out their air defense network, so it's very much a military operation."

That was a nice way of saying "blowing things up would be involved."

HARM for fifty, Alex. :cool:
 
avatar3676_4.gif
KingMerv00 said:
I am pretty firmly in the "tyrants suck" camp. I'd rather the American military not get involved though. It leads to too much collateral damage and it turns out people don't like us turning their infrastructure into rubble-themed modern art.
Click to expand...

I think you do not know anything about Libya or Kadaffi or the history of the region or the psychology of the people. Am I right?

And I notice you use a lot of Western terms like "tyrant" and "collateral damage". I think you are rooted in a mindset foreign to Islam and the Mid East. Am I right?

It has been my personal expience that the Western News Media does not tell the truth. What is more is that it is not their business to explain complex issues to you so that you understand what the real story is. That is up to you. But I have noticed that human beings in the USA and other Western countries are much too lazy to do their own research or even think for themselves. It just might be possible that there is a large segment of the population in Libya who are willing to die for Kadaffi. This is an idea that is beyond most Westerners to even imagine or accept as even possibly being true. Just wait. Time will tell.

According to the way you see things, Muhammad would be classified as a "tyrant" and the spread of Islam is something you would call "collateral damage". And yet, ironically, it is the Liberals in the USA who would defend Islam as a religion of peace and insist on such hog wash as "there are radicals in every religion". To me this is glaring and unavoidable proof that the political Left in the USA is ignorant, uneducated and delusional.

Let's stick to the facts:
1. Kadaffy is not a tyrant. Show me proof if you think he is. You would not falsely accuse someone, I assume. What makes you think that he is?
2. The USA is hypercritical in protesting his attacks on "unarmed protestors". The USA National Guard mowed down peaceful unarmed protestors in Ohio during the Vietnam war. Were any of those responsible ever brought to trial? Did any country in the world protest this by sanctions or freezing foreign assets of the American officials?
3. What about all horror the ATF has inflected on people? They fire first and ask questions later. The only reason why Wacco got into the news is that the Branch Dividians managed to engage them initially and kick their ass.

The fact is, if any group in the USA gets together and the American government thinks they are serious about taking over the Government, the American government would probably squish them.

Apart from that, we do not have the right to protest another culture's way of doing things -- unless, of couse we are willing to step up to the plate and insist that Islam is not a good thing. Insulting the Prophet Muhammed in many Mid East cultures is a death sentence. The Green Book is based on many Islamic traditions.

To say Khadaffi does not have a right to slaughter people trying to take over his government is wrong on many levels. What is more is that he might win. What would we say then after our government is guilty of aiding the people fighting him?
002170196e1c0ed7c13a13.jpg



There is clearly another side to this war. It is one that is distasteful to the Western Press and does not get reported on because of this. The fact is, Khaddaffi's days are not numbered. He might win. And, as this and many other pictures show, He has people on his side as well as a military. Did you think, by the way, that the protestors in Tienimin Square in China were going to win?

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2011-03/02/content_12098488.htm
 
Last edited:
Why the love affair with Khadaffi, Bill?
Just another attempt to be daring and edgy?
Saying we should not get involved militarly is one thing, to whitewash Khadaffi is another.
 
We now have more casualties in the Libyan civil war caused by government forces than in the last 40 years of US history (reaching back to Kent State) within the USA.

If you want the truth of what is happening in Libya and don't trust "Western" news sources you can try Al Jazeera. http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/spotlight/libya/

Gaddafi is somewhat disconnected from reality.

Libya's falling tyrant. Gaddafi reaps what he has sown during his four-decade rule: terror, nepotism, tribal politics and abuse of power.
Click to expand...
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/201122120055942895.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom