Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

[mehmetin]

.
Rational people will consider Lewis' work history of the finest quality.

You can follow him. You are just a crudulous follower. I am not! I decide my own opinion and support it.

 

[mehmetin]

Originally Posted by mehmetin
Bernard Lewis' arguments are to be considered as lies, misinterpretation, propaganda for Israel and Zionists, propaganda against Muslims, ...

Attitudes like "We have no friends in the world and everyone is else is out to get us" as well as the tendency by some to blame the Jews for everything is so common as to be a national shame for Turkey. If I had a Lira for every time I have heard the boron conspiracy ...

This is your attitude, not mine. I just spoke about ONE people's records. At first I was not aware that Bernard Lewis was Jew. Now that does not surprise me. I juwt tell him: Continue to lie, Mr. Lewis, you'll just be the champion of liars.

You should know that: Whoever does bad do it to himself, whoever do good does it to himself. It's so simple. And if you want to make bed, feel free to do it, you will do it to yourself, finally you'll destroy yourself.

 

[mehmetin]

Originally Posted by beachnut
Originally Posted by Thunder
I beg someone...BEG them to explain to me how the hijackers taken over the planes at 8:13, 8:42, 8:53, and 9:34.......means anything????????

I certainly didn't. Spell it out in no uncertain terms.

Didn't you got the explanation of the succession of the hijacks? Sure you got it. Everybody got it here, posted it several tiems here, and it's in my web site!

You just ignored it. You don't like strong evidence.

 

[mehmetin]

Originally Posted by mehmetin
At least, it means that you ignore the truth.

No, I don't ignore the truth of 19 Islamic murderers did 911. No, I don't ignore the truth of you spreading hateful anti-peace propaganda and lies on 911.

The thruth is in my picture, you can not igonre it. Everytime you read a post from me, you get it again. And you still ignore it! You prefer to ignore strong evidence. You just support and follow lies.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

ONLY ONE cellular phone call made at 35000ft and the caller ID recognised by the wife of Tom Burnett is enough to tell ALL phone calls were faked. And I verified that. So all other phone calls could not be considered as evidence.

How can a muslim reseacher know that cell phones "can't" be reached @ 35,000 ft? Some how a person with limited reasoning skills doesn't quite cut it.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Didn't you got the explanation of the succession of the hijacks? Sure you got it. Everybody got it here, posted it several tiems here, and it's in my web site!

You just ignored it. You don't like strong evidence.

Seriously, I don't understand how the sequence leads to the conclusion that the planes were hijacked.

 

[beachnut]

The thruth is in my picture, you can not igonre it. Everytime you read a post from me, you get it again. And you still ignore it! You prefer to ignore strong evidence. You just support and follow lies.

It is a moronic claim you make and you can't explain it. You lie, you have no evidence. You hate Israel and the USA so you make up idiotic lies only morons will believe. You can't explain your failed graph.

You both got the information, and both ignored it. Morever you misinterpreted it to create confusion.

I am a pilot, I looked at your time graph and found each terrorist cell waited for level off to rush the cockpit. So the timing is right after level off, you don't understand your graph is evidence ti happened based on each plane flight profile. The graph proves you have a fantasy witch you can't explain. You have failed to get one thing right about 911 and bring up nonsense of remote control planes. Remote control planes is false, the pilots flew the jets themselves. To be able to remotely control 767/757, you have to model the aerodynamic qualities of the aircraft, you can't use a tomahawk guidance system because it will not control a 767/757, it was made for a small cruise missile with entirely different flying characteristics, the plane would crash as soon as you activate the flight control system. You have delusions about things you can't comprehend. Have you the equation of motion for the 767/757 let alone the equations of motion for flight?

 

[I Ratant]

[77QUOTE=mehmetin;6926255]Didn't you got the explanation of the succession of the hijacks? Sure you got it. Everybody got it here, posted it several tiems here, and it's in my web site!

You just ignored it. You don't like strong evidence.[/QUOTE]
.
The hijacking sequences are detailed here, as is the activities -in the cockpits (the little room in the front of a plane where the human pilots sit) as to what happened when and to which systems during the takeover of the 4 flights by the 19 Muslim murderers.
http://www.ntsb.gov/info/autopilot_aa77_ua93_study.pdf
.
Note on pages 3-5 the numerous changes made to the autopilot and flight mode panels, which were done -in the cockpit, the little room in the front of a plane where the pilots sit, and could be done only from there, not by some gimcrack piece of crap jammed in some place in the plane, which lacking any noodly appendages, would be unable to change the settings on the flight mode panel.

 

[mehmetin]

Seriously, I don't understand how the sequence leads to the conclusion that the planes were hijacked.

I explained it too many times. It's explained in my power point file. You should think and understand facts. I can not make it for you. I can't think for your, you must think yourself.

 

[beachnut]

How can a muslim reseacher know that cell phones "can't" be reached @ 35,000 ft? Some how a person with limited reasoning skills doesn't quite cut it.

That was funny, he uses the fact a cell phone did work at 35,000 feet but was short most likely due to the plane flying 600 mph, as his cell phones don't work; as the calls that lasted were from seat backs, a system that worked but cost lots of money. What a failure, we have a hateful propagandist making up moronic lies.

 

[beachnut]

I explained it too many times. It's explained in my power point file. You should think and understand facts. I can not make it for you. I can't think for your, you must think yourself.

The power point file is one big lie, propagada based on hate, and anti-peace.

Slide 6, a lie. You say none of the black boxes released. I have flight 77 FDR data, I have Flight 93 CVR information. Why do you spread lies? I have Flight 93 FDR. You lied. Flight 11 and 175 were lost in building collapses equal in energy to 250 2,000 pounds bombs dropped on the WTC complex, the kinetic energy of collapse of the Twin Towers. Got Physics?

Slide 6 is a lie, I have the data from the FDRs on 77 and 93.

 

[Sideroxylon]

I explained it too many times. It's explained in my power point file. You should think and understand facts. I can not make it for you. I can't think for your, you must think yourself.

Humour me and spell it out in very simple English.

 

[George 152]

I explained it too many times. It's explained in my power point file. You should think and understand facts. I can not make it for you. I can't think for your, you must think yourself.

You are wrong. Your basic premise is wrong.
You are trying to tell pilots things that are impossible in aircraft.

 

[mehmetin]

It is a moronic claim you make and you can't explain it. You lie, you have no evidence. You hate Israel and the USA so you make up idiotic lies only morons will believe. You can't explain your failed graph.

Keep you hateful accusation for yourself. All evidence is consistent with “Mossad/Bush administration made inside job”.

I am a pilot, I looked at your time graph and found each terrorist cell waited for level off to rush the cockpit. So the timing is right after level off, you don't understand your graph is evidence ti happened based on each plane flight profile.

That was discussed in the past. You become silent after that, and now you come back with the same lie. See http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6879693&postcount=141

The graph proves you have a fantasy witch you can't explain. You have failed to get one thing right about 911 and bring up nonsense of remote control planes. Remote control planes is false, the pilots flew the jets themselves. To be able to remotely control 767/757, you have to model the aerodynamic qualities of the aircraft, you can't use a tomahawk guidance system because it will not control a 767/757, it was made for a small cruise missile with entirely different flying characteristics, the plane would crash as soon as you activate the flight control system. You have delusions about things you can't comprehend. Have you the equation of motion for the 767/757 let alone the equations of motion for flight?

If you were a little bit honest engineer you’ll not consider the size difference between tomahawk and 767/757! Why? Simply because the PID regulation loop will always make linear the out put and get the right guidance to the target. It’s just a parameter adjustment operation.

 

[WildCat]

Seriously, I don't understand how the sequence leads to the conclusion that the planes were hijacked.

That's because you're rational and sane. Maybe you'd understand if, as a baby, you were dropped on your head or something.

 

[mehmetin]

The power point file is one big lie, propagada based on hate, and anti-peace.

Slide 6, a lie. You say none of the black boxes released. I have flight 77 FDR data, I have Flight 93 CVR information. Why do you spread lies? I have Flight 93 FDR. You lied. Flight 11 and 175 were lost in building collapses equal in energy to 250 2,000 pounds bombs dropped on the WTC complex, the kinetic energy of collapse of the Twin Towers. Got Physics?

Slide 6 is a lie, I have the data from the FDRs on 77 and 93.

I do not more trust any of the released data too much later. I know that AA77's FDR is fake; it's not coming from the right direction, it stops seconds before the impact.

UA93's one is also fake; the sounds are meaningless.

Bush administration produced faked evidence and lied to whole world.

 

[mehmetin]

Originally Posted by Sideroxylon
Seriously, I don't understand how the sequence leads to the conclusion that the planes were hijacked.

That's because you're rational and sane. Maybe you'd understand if, as a baby, you were dropped on your head or something.

None of you is able to explain teh successive aspect of teh hijacks which are interdependent. 4 different teams could not produce such interdependent hijacks.

I know, your logics is unable to understand that. You are not ignorant, you are disinformation agents.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

That was funny, he uses the fact a cell phone did work at 35,000 feet but was short most likely due to the plane flying 600 mph, as his cell phones don't work; as the calls that lasted were from seat backs, a system that worked but cost lots of money. What a failure, we have a hateful propagandist making up moronic lies.

I'm surprised that he has internet service at all. Considering that he makes fun of us all the time about "lying", etc. He blames us for being "arrogant" & "ignorant", it's amazing that some Jawa is capable of typing on the keyboard and finding his way on the internet.

 

[Thunder]

Seriously, I don't understand how the sequence leads to the conclusion that the planes were hijacked.

there is no rational, logical, or any other common-sense reason to look at the hijacking sequence and see anything suspicious.

 

[Sideroxylon]

None of you is able to explain teh successive aspect of teh hijacks which are interdependent. 4 different teams could not produce such interdependent hijacks.

I know, your logics is unable to understand that. You are not ignorant, you are disinformation agents.

My Bold.

Do you really believe that?