Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

mehmetin said:
The main question that starts everything is "How and Why 4 different teams made successive hijacks?"
Click to expand...

I don't understand what you think was difficult about this. Could you please explain?

I mean, the why is easy. To kill people. The how is just as easy. Pick out flights that are taking off at approximately the same time. Hijack them. Fly them into targets. What is it that you find so impossible about this?
 
Last edited:
I Ratant said:
Meh, your knowledge of aircraft operations sucks, to be technical about it.
The hijackers on two of the flights used the -autopilot- to fly most of the way towards the intended targets.
The flight into the Pentagon, for one, and the flight terminating in the crash in Pennsylvania for the other.
The other two flights appear to have non-autopilot controlled segments.
The long diversion across New Jersey on the UAL-175 flight, for one.
And the flight of AA-11. Mostly hand-controlled flight.
Click to expand...

That’s your asserts. Nothing proves them, and that’s meaningless.

I Ratant said:
The standard issue autopilot can do everything involved in the flights.
Click to expand...

Autopilot can not push the body of a pilot who died on the flight control stick. But a worm gear based actuator can push the body.

I Ratant said:
All the person(s) in the cockpit (the little room up front where the human pilots sit) need do is determine where they are, and where they wish to go, and set up the autopilot to do exactly that.
And you might note that the Mossad agents flying the plane most likely would not likely be shouting "Allahu Akhbar" as they crashed the plane in Pennsylvania. Muslims would, and have been noted doing that on other flight hijackings.
Click to expand...

Muslims will not shout “Allahu Akbar” in such case. But Mossad agents who made the attacks will use such sentences to presents things as Muslims made.

I Ratant said:
Other than these lapses in knowledge, you display nothing of any consequence relative to knowing what you are blathering about.
Click to expand...

I am still waiting the explanation: HOW and WHY 4 different teams made successive hijacks? Bush got that question in 2006! He went out silent about that question. And nobody answered to that question with logical explanation based on strong evidence.
 
mehmetin said:
When an independent justice investigation will be started. Without that, it's useless to speak out. I just put it in my book.
Click to expand...
Do you hope to sell copies of this book? I have spent exactly 25 minutes time (research) and I can show you as a fraud (or a deluded believer). Nothing in your book you can prove. It is fiction. If you publish this book and make money I will expose you as a fraud and expect damages. Do you want to play?
 
mehmetin said:
When an independent justice investigation will be started. Without that, it's useless to speak out. I just put it in my book.
Click to expand...

Hocam, şaka yapıyor musunuz?, I am a bit slow on the uptake at times but I am laughing now. Pigs will fly first :D
 
mehmetin said:
Siz ciddi olun ve gerçeklere ciddi gözle bakın. O zaman alarsınız. Benim işimde ciddiyet var, sahtekarlık yok.
Click to expand...


You are all talk but no substance and I am seriously doubting your honesty.

ETA: We both know that your research doesn't cut the mustard*.

* You can google that if you need to.
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
...
I showed you how big are the vertical propagation of the waves of GSM antennas. They are not propagated at all. In the best case, we have only 10° upper the horizontal line. That means no vertical propagation is possible. That means no cellular phone calls are possible from 35000ft kind altitude. So, all cellular phone calls are FAKE.

...
Click to expand...
Liar, I made cell calls in flight - you are telling lies.
You spread lies. The truth is cell phones can work in flight, I have done it; but you will experience poor reception, so in an emergency on old planes you would use the seat back phones.

Saying cell phones can't work, or impossible, is a moronic lie, not based on science.
 
EventHorizon said:
How and Why 4 different teams made successive hijacks?"

I don't understand what you think was difficult about this. Could you please explain?

I mean, the why is easy. To kill people. The how is just as easy. Pick out flights that are taking off at approximately the same time. Hijack them. Fly them into targets. What is it that you find so impossible about this?
Click to expand...

The question is "Why the hijacks were successive?". The succession of the hijacks is a fact gathered from the actual "take off-deviation-impact" times. Here is the graphic
Timeline911.jpg
.

The red bars are the flight times during which the planes were hijacked. As you can see these times follows each other, making the hijacks successive.

Creating such successive hijacks repeating themselves in all four planes is impossible to be made by four independent teams inside each plane who can not contact each other. Such four different teams have no reason to create any succession between the planes, and it’s almost impossible for them to produce such succession.

That’s what I mean. You can find more detailed explanation in my power point at www.peace911.org , slides 7.1 to 14.

By reverse, if one top secret American/Mossad team made such attacks by using technology; they are obliged to make the hijacks successively as it happened. This is the first undebunkable evidence that proves one team controlled the planes. If you have another explanation, I listen you.
 
beachnut said:
Liar, I made cell calls in flight - you are telling lies.
You spread lies. The truth is cell phones can work in flight, I have done it; but you will experience poor reception, so in an emergency on old planes you would use the seat back phones.

Saying cell phones can't work, or impossible, is a moronic lie, not based on science.
Click to expand...
What's your view on the "strong cables" argument. I am working on the exact lay-out but so far his assertions have been way off base. Any comments?
 
DGM said:
Do you hope to sell copies of this book? I have spent exactly 25 minutes time (research) and I can show you as a fraud (or a deluded believer). Nothing in your book you can prove. It is fiction. If you publish this book and make money I will expose you as a fraud and expect damages. Do you want to play?
Click to expand...

Yes, I am ready. Feel free to do it. That will make larger sale of my book and bring the strikes into justice. YESSSS! ;)
 
Sideroxylon said:
Hocam, şaka yapıyor musunuz?, I am a bit slow on the uptake at times but I am laughing now. Pigs will fly first :D
Click to expand...

I was clear since the beginning! Justice should be made about the attacks of 9/11/2001. I am NOT joking.
 
Sideroxylon said:
You are all talk but no substance and I am seriously doubting your honesty.

ETA: We both know that your research doesn't cut the mustard*.

* You can google that if you need to.
Click to expand...

The strongest thing on which you can trust is my honesty. I am a sincere researcher, I am not joking, I made 7 years investigation, I checked every single evidence that was asked, I connected together all evidence, ... finally my explanation on how the strikes were made is strong enough to challenge Bush himself. Bush got three letters from me, and he went out silent. I presented my work to too many people, none was able to debunk it by using strong arguments.

I do not challenge so much people for nothing. I know that 9/11 attacks were NOT made by Muslims. If I am telling wrong, USA can easily put me into justice. But they do not dare to. Bush administration was criminal and made the attacks of 9/11 with the collaboration of Mossad.

If they refuse such assertions, they just have to complaint into justice.
 
beachnut said:
I showed you how big are the vertical propagation of the waves of GSM antennas. They are not propagated at all. In the best case, we have only 10° upper the horizontal line. That means no vertical propagation is possible. That means no cellular phone calls are possible from 35000ft kind altitude. So, all cellular phone calls are FAKE.

Liar, I made cell calls in flight - you are telling lies.
You spread lies. The truth is cell phones can work in flight, I have done it; but you will experience poor reception, so in an emergency on old planes you would use the seat back phones.

Saying cell phones can't work, or impossible, is a moronic lie, not based on science.
Click to expand...

My words here up proves that you are lying. Be careful, in my words here up, tehre is no accusation of lying! There is scientific mathematical calculations proving that antennas are not made to communicate with high altitude planes. Istead of accusing me, you should just try to prove why my explanation is wrong. You are welcome for that.
 
mehmetin said:
Yes, I am ready. Feel free to do it. That will make larger sale of my book and bring the strikes into justice. YESSSS! ;)
Click to expand...
I've got to ask. How do you think it will "make larger sales"? Are you really this clueless?

Let me guess, you're still "looking for a publisher"?
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
My words here up proves that you are lying. Be careful, in my words here up, tehre is no accusation of lying! There is scientific mathematical calculations proving that antennas are not made to communicate with high altitude planes. Istead of accusing me, you should just try to prove why my explanation is wrong. You are welcome for that.
Click to expand...

1 - you are still wrong about the cell phones.

2 - GTE Airfone. Google it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom