Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

Anders Lindman said:
Attempts to explain perhaps. True skeptical thinking is open to both sides of the arguments.
Click to expand...

When one does look at both sides of the arguements, it's not hard at all to see that the conspiracy theorist side is crazy, inconsistent and often blatantly dishonest.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Attempts to explain perhaps. True skeptical thinking is open to both sides of the arguments.
Click to expand...

No, you don't have a side to the argument. There is no argument. There is what is supported by evidence and what is not. The fact members of Al Qaida hijacked four airplanes and crashed them into three buildings and attempted a fourth is supported by evidence. Your silly little ideas are not.
 
Also, true skeptics know when, after looking at all sides of an argument, to put their weight behind the one that makes the most sense. Anders, you are putting your weight behind what is basically the argument that makes the LEAST sense, even when compared to other 9-11 inside job arguments.
 
Yet another sad game that conspiracy kooks play. The minute you don't agree with them, you haven't even looked at their side, you aren't openminded, you aren't a true skeptic, blah blah blah....

They seem to think that nobody should ever come to the conclusion that they are they are wrong and if you do, there has to be some nefarious reason for it other than you have evaluated their story and found it to be foolishness.
 
beachnut said:
Only idiots are no-planers. Morgan Reynolds is insane, he is a no planer.

http://nomoregames.net/ Mental Illness, personified. Happy Dale next patient.

Thousand of people saw 175 impact the WTC on 911, and RADAR data verifies it was 175. Only mentally ill morons would deny it. RADAR data can't be refuted, it is reality, based on science. To deny 175 impacted the WTC is enough to be committed to a mental institution for the insane.

Why are no-plane crazies able to type and have web pages? Freedom of speech?
Click to expand...

I think the radar data has been doctored. What say the Pentagon no planers who believe there were real planes at the WTC? Isn't there radar data for the alleged plane flying into the Pentagon?
 
Anders you are one step away from declaring that the government put a drug into the NYC water supply late the night before and made everybody in the city hallucinate the planes. Yea, it's getting THAT ridiculous.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I think the radar data has been doctored. What say the Pentagon no planers who believe there were real planes at the WTC? Isn't there radar data for the alleged plane flying into the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

Understanding that you've done nothing that would cause you to be taken seriously, what is you desired end state here? Is it you want to pretend to have some secret insight and be better than all the sheeple who swallow the government line? Great, you win. Go to your basement and feel superior.

It's not as if you're going to cause anything to happen other than an intellectual beat down on a message board. You can't possibly believe that your ill informed ideas are going to accomplish anything other than satisfying your martyr complex. Are you trying to be a poor downtrodden soul fighting for the truth?
 
twinstead said:
Anders you are one step away from declaring that the government put a drug into the NYC water supply late the night before and made everybody in the city hallucinate the planes. Yea, it's getting THAT ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Make that worldwide.
Every-one with a TV that day saw the aircraft.
 
MarcoPolo said:
Just wanted to post this ultra-secret document about the planning that went into 9/11, years before. Anders can probably run with it.

www.debatenation.com/BroodParasite.pdf
Click to expand...

The document talks about the use of airliners or missiles. That's a false theory I think. Maybe a missile was used at the Pentagon but I doubt it. They probably just used explosives to blow a hole in the Pentagon. Plus I'm not even sure that the attack on the Pentagon was a part of the original attacks on the WTC or if it was only a part of the cover-up.
 
Anders Lindman said:
The document talks about the use of airliners or missiles. That's a false theory I think. Maybe a missile was used at the Pentagon but I doubt it. They probably just used explosives to blow a hole in the Pentagon. Plus I'm not even sure that the attack on the Pentagon was a part of the original attacks on the WTC or if it was only a part of the cover-up.
Click to expand...

No they used a plane. You've concocted some stupid fairy which isn't good enough to be bothered with.
 
Craig4 said:
No they used a plane. You've concocted some stupid fairy which isn't good enough to be bothered with.
Click to expand...

No plane was used for tower 2. They used computer generated imagery that is easily seen for anyone who wants to date reality.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I think the radar data has been doctored. What say the Pentagon no planers who believe there were real planes at the WTC? Isn't there radar data for the alleged plane flying into the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

Alleged?
The aircraft was seen by hundreds of motorists on the nearby highway and was tracked in visually by an aircraft.
The RADAR data reinforces the 'Blackbox' and CVR data...
 
7forever said:
No plane was used for tower 2. They used computer generated imagery that is easily seen for anyone who wants to date reality.
Click to expand...

Riiight.
The videos (Multiple) of the last seconds of the aircraft were taken from more than one angle...
Fail
 
WB11 didn't get their digital plane until 24 minutes after tower 2 exploded.:jaw-dropp It was first called a possible helicopter and that quickly changed. There is zero evidence of planes that can withstand a reality check. The orb was last shown one minute before the plane morph showed up, which had no wings and two dots for engines, attached to nothing. Note the time change to 9:27.

wb-926-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

wb-927-morph_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

wtcwb11926.jpg

wtcwb927.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIyGEDvG9KQ&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=34
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom