Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

9/11 Chewy Defense said:
We're all innocent here. Wanna blame some people, start with everyone here.
Click to expand...

You just managed to deviate teh discussion from science about 9/11 to dirty accusation of religions everywhere. You ar really disinfo and protectors of the perpetrators of 9/11; i.e. Mossad & Bush administration.
 
mehmetin said:
Yes, that would be a sin only if am aware that I am wrong. For that, you need to prove me that I am wrong with strong evidence. And in that case, I a mready to change opinion and apologise!

Istead of proving me anything, you just create confusion and ad-hominem attacks. You are not credible.
Click to expand...

What if you are presented with strong evidence, yet instead of accepting it you just blindly--and with no evidence--declare it fake? Then you are being willfully ignorant and we are right back to it being a sin again.

See how that works? You aren't allowed to simply disregard evidence that you are wrong because you think it was faked, or you don't like the source. You have to prove it was faked. Otherwise it isn't a real dialog, it's just you and a simple debate technique that every jailhouse lawyer, snake oil salesman, ideologue, paranoid schizophrenic, and idiot uses to forward his agenda.

If WE can see through it, Allah certainly can.
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
You just managed to deviate teh discussion from science about 9/11 to dirty accusation of religions everywhere. You ar really disinfo and protectors of the perpetrators of 9/11; i.e. Mossad & Bush administration.
Click to expand...

Actually YOU're the 1 that brought up that YOU're a Muslim & YOU're the one that brought up religion on this thread that YOU made.

You know, you keep blaming Bush & the Mossad for everything, the only problem is: They're not Muslims!

"Allah Admiral Ackbar"

Admiral Ackbar: You can see here, the Death Star orbiting the forest moon of Endor. Although, the weapon systems on this Death Star or not yet operational, the Death Star does have a strong defense mechanism. It is protected by an energy shield which is generated from the nearby forest moon of Endor.
[the projector shows the DeathStar and the yellow lights indicating the sheild]

Admiral Ackbar: The sheild must be deactivated, if any attack is to be attempted.
[the projector enlarges the Death Star image]

Admiral Ackbar: Once the shield is down, our cruisers will create a perimeter, while our fighters fly into the superstructure and attempt to knock out the main reactor.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
Yes, that would be a sin only if am aware that I am wrong. For that, you need to prove me that I am wrong with strong evidence. And in that case, I a mready to change opinion and apologise!

Istead of proving me anything, you just create confusion and ad-hominem attacks. You are not credible.
Click to expand...

Don't you also have a duty to make sure that you are right in your extraordinary, non-consensus idea? Also, do you understand just how horribly insulting this sounds to those members of the country that were the victims of this crime. Just stop for a moment and imagine such a crime had been purported against your own country and this was the reaction.

I agree that a lot of the debate in this thread is not great, but frankly it is a reflection on your own argument here and on the website. Also, aside from your "novel" gas claims, this has all been thoroughly done to death and is on the record in the forums for your perusal.
 
I'd like to bring to Meh's attention this list of attacks by Muslims:

Attacks from Dec. 25, 2010 - Feb. 22, 2011 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks

Previous Years:

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2010 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2010.htm

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2009 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2009.htm

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2008 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2008.htm

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2007 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2007.htm

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2006 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2006.htm

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2005 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2005.htm

Islamic Terror Attacks for 2004 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2004.htm

Islamic Attacks from September 11th, 2001 through 2003 - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks-2001-2003.htm
Click to expand...

Meh can't explain away all these attacks by Muslims.
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
All actions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and partly in Pakistan are made by the invasions. Even in Iraq, before the invasion, there was no war, peaople were calm. So the responsible people are who made the invasion. In fact, they control the countries and they perpetrate other crimes.
Click to expand...
.
Before the invasion, Iraq was controlled by a murderous dictator.
Over the past centuries, murderous dictators are normal for that section of the world.
Ruthless oppression of everyone.
Having a very effective and deadly police force tends to make the citizens "calm".
Those that aren't "calm" are soon dead.
You may look at the response to civic unrest in Libya today.
Today.
 
Sideroxylon said:
Also, do you understand just how horribly insulting this sounds to those members of the country that were the victims of this crime. Just stop for a moment and imagine such a crime had been purported against your own country and this was the reaction.
Click to expand...

I think this is an important point. What if 9-11 had happened in Mehmetin's country and people were accusing his own countrymen of the most awful crime on the slimmest and most tenuous of evidence, when real evidence showed that they were wrong.

It IS incredibly insulting.
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
Do you threatening me? The main reason why I am alive is that I am not linked to any illegal organization or illegal action, or illegal work. I am not linked to any power or influence relation too. I am a usual family father.That's all. I definitely decided to not use weapons, so weapons can not reach me.
Click to expand...

Sooo you don't believe any of the stuff you've been spewing( Bush, USA, all powerful, all seeing, and controlling)! That's good, you were starting to sound like a crazy person.:rolleyes:

Please explain the part, I've put in bold. Or maybe I should just Stundie it.
If I wasn't starting think this is all parody, on your part, I would. No one can be this dense.
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
Even in Iraq, before the invasion, there was no war, peaople were calm.
Click to expand...
Wasn't there something going on betwen Iraq and Iran prior to any invasion? I could swear I saw something about war and poison gas and tanker wars and scuds and human wave attacks and 5-10 year old children walking hand in hand across mine fields to clear them... do you recall any of that mehmetin?
 
WildCat said:
Wasn't there something going on betwen Iraq and Iran prior to any invasion? I could swear I saw something about war and poison gas and tanker wars and scuds and human wave attacks and 5-10 year old children walking hand in hand across mine fields to clear them... do you recall any of that mehmetin?
Click to expand...

Not to mention gassing of the Kurdish regions in the north! Those mean Allied forces, created a no fly zone to protect them. Meanies!
 
Saddam's history of suppression of dissent makes Qaddafi's current actions in Libya look like a Tupperware party.
 
mehmetin said:
They don't know what really happened. In other words, the only reason is their ignorance about the facts and their follow of the official story.
Click to expand...


All you've done here is restated the comment that made me ask you that question in the first place.

Why do you assume that?

It seems to me that your only reason for claiming that no one else has done an equivalent amount of research as you is that... they disagree with you. Is that the case? If so, you're being delusional. If that's not the case, then surely you have something more substantial to support your position; let's say... "information" that hasn't been known about for 5 years or more, and which is unknown to the person you're arguing against.

There is also another reason: Most of their posts are ad-hominem attacks against me. There is no scientific arguments in their posts. That's also why I do not answer them.
Click to expand...


That's hardly a reasonable or substantial piece of evidence on which to base your conclusion. The people you're arguing with have been arguing with people like you for years; they're tired of it. When you come in here spouting stale information like it's 2006 all over again, it's not unexpected that they roll their eyes and try to wave you away as yet another clueless truther. Because that's how you come off...
 
Last edited:
I'm curious about the OP's assertion that the timing of the hijacks is evidence that a "single team" was responsible for all four hijackings. This assertion is absurd on its face, but, if I am not mistaken it would also require that the "single team", after hijacking a plane and installing a "Tomahawk control system" must have transferred from that plane in flight, to another plane in flight. So apparently in addition to installing the "Tomahawk control system" and gassing the crew and passengers they also installed a Star Trek transporter.
 
Last edited:
CORed said:
I'm curious about the OP's assertion that the timing of the hijacks is evidence that a "single team" was responsible for all four hijackings. This assertion is absurd on its face, but, if I am not mistaken it would also require that the "single team", after hijacking a plane and installing a "Tomahawk control system" must have transferred from that plane in flight, to another plane in flight. So apparently in addition to installing the "Tomahawk control system" and gassing the crew and passengers they also installed a Star Trek transporter.
Click to expand...
I believe he thinks it was controlled from the ground by remote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom