Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

[twinstead]

I have already posted about that several times before.

Yea, but from what I remember you just stated it, you didn't provide any evidence to support it.

But I could be wrong. I do get confused between all you truthers and the stuff you folks post sometimes. Are you the one who got the time zones mixed up in one instance? Or was that jammonius? Christ I need a scorecard.

Anywhoo, be a doll and post it one more time, and I'll shut up about it.

 

[Anders Lindman]

You've not posted evidence.

Convincing enough evidence for me, but I can't prove that it is waterproof. It has been discussed a lot, such as: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=14399

 

[Anders Lindman]

Yea, but from what I remember you just stated it, you didn't provide any evidence to support it.

But I could be wrong. I do get confused between all you truthers and the stuff you folks post sometimes. Are you the one who got the time zones mixed up in one instance? Or was that jammonius? Christ I need a scorecard.

Anywhoo, be a doll and post it one more time, and I'll shut up about it.

See (link in) my previous post.

 

[Craig4]

Convincing enough evidence for me, but I can't prove that it is waterproof. It has been discussed a lot, such as: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=14399

Your critical thinking skills aren't good enough.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Convincing enough evidence for me, but I can't prove that it is waterproof. It has been discussed a lot, such as: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=14399

If you can't prove anything, then you're wasting everyones time here.

Question(s):

Why are you here & what are you looking for?

 

[Craig4]

See (link in) my previous post.

We have. We're still waiting for evidence.

 

[Anders Lindman]

If you can't prove anything, then you're wasting everyones time here.

Question(s):

Why are you here & what are you looking for?

Waiting for someone to do the job for me.

 

[twinstead]

See (link in) my previous post.

Okay. I looked at it. Be honest. Is this what you consider rock-solid evidence? And there you go again: The flight tag looks like.

It looks like a bunch of unreadable blobs to me. Or Klingon. Maybe the flight was hijacked by Klingons?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Okay. I looked at it. Be honest. Is this what you consider rock-solid evidence? And there you go again: The flight tag looks like.

It looks like a bunch of unreadable blobs to me. Or Klingon. Maybe the flight was hijacked by Klingons?

In another video they had zoomed in on the text and it looked like UAL175 to me.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Waiting for someone to do the job for me.

So you're one of those lazy type Truthers? You'd rather let people do your homework for you & help you cheat.

Well if you were in school, you'd get "F-" & get held back a year.

 

[Craig4]

In another video they had zoomed in on the text and it looked like UA175 to me.

So where is Mr. Hansen the guy who made the call I quoted? His daughter should be just starting middle school. Where is she? Want to look up Mr. Hansen's dad and ask him?

 

[twinstead]

In another video they had zoomed in on the text and it looked like UAL175 to me.

Is that video on that link you provided?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Is that video on that link you provided?

Here is a screen shot of the text: http://i51.tinypic.com/4tq6fn.jpg

 

[Anders Lindman]

So where is Mr. Hansen the guy who made the call I quoted? His daughter should be just starting middle school. Where is she? Want to look up Mr. Hansen's dad and ask him?

False witness?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Here is a screen shot of the text: http://i51.tinypic.com/4tq6fn.jpg

Actually if you have a keen eye you'd notice that it does say "UAL175". Another slam dunk that there were planes!

 

[Craig4]

False witness?

Tell his father.

 

[twinstead]

Here is a screen shot of the text: http://i51.tinypic.com/4tq6fn.jpg

Okay, It's hard to see, but let's say it says UAL 175. All that would show that there actually was a UAL 175 in the air. Can you remind me what you find suspicious about this, and why?

 

[Anders Lindman]

So you're one of those lazy type Truthers? You'd rather let people do your homework for you & help you cheat.

Well if you were in school, you'd get "F-" & get held back a year.

And what grade would you give those who searched for black boxes at Ground Zero? If there really were real planes, then those responsible for the search must have done a very shoddy job. Yes?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Okay, It's hard to see, but let's say it says UAL 175. All that would show that there actually was a UAL 175 in the air. Can you remind me what you find suspicious about this, and why?

Because the shot is from a live news television broadcast at a point in time AFTER flight 175 is said to have crashed into the WTC.

 

[twinstead]

Because the shot is from a live news television broadcast at a point in time AFTER flight 175 is said to have crashed into the WTC.

Just because the broadcast was live doesn't mean the shot of the plane being identified was live. They could have acquired that image just before the crash and then continued playing it after the fact for visual emphasis. That would be tantamount to seeing an image of the burning WTC7 buildings being shown after the collapse and finding it suspicious.

There could be any number of additional innocent explanations. Shouldn't you eliminate all of those before you present the video as some kind of evidence of wrong doing?