dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
Pathetic,truly pathetic.Then those must be fake witness testimonies, if people at EWR really claimed that they saw in real life a plane hitting the South Tower. They probably saw it on CNN.![]()
Pathetic,truly pathetic.Then those must be fake witness testimonies, if people at EWR really claimed that they saw in real life a plane hitting the South Tower. They probably saw it on CNN.![]()
Get a grip. I'm disgusted. Three planes hit buildings, one crashed on it's way to hit another building. What kind of a complete imbecile would waste time on idiotic nonsense like this? It's like standing over a body laying next to it's own severed head and a samurai sword and asking what the cause of death was. You're wrong. You're willfully ignorant and you need to find a hobby that doesn't dance on the graves of the dead. Despicable. Vile.
But the FBI are looking into the videos. Why would they do that unless there was some chance of video fakery?
But the FBI are looking into the videos. Why would they do that unless there was some chance of video fakery?
Probably want to find out who made it and investigate him.
Yeah, I guess that would be a rather big cover-up, but it could have been done!
Since you seemed to have missed it..
was psa 1771 a fake crash? Was it a psyop? Was it a test run?
Please address the issue of the similarities between psa 1771 and flight 93.
Go beyond wikipedia.
I looked up that crash and my impression is that it was a real crash.
When are you going to learn that you are so ill-informed about the topics related to 9/11 that your thoughts, impressions, guesses, feelings, are of no importance what so ever?
I look into conspiracy theories from time to time to see if some new evidence has appeared. It seems to me that the no planes theory is still valid at least.
Why is it valid? You don't understand anything about terrorism, engineering, airplanes, physics, fire science. What makes your views valid?
I haven't seen any new info that makes the no planes theory invalid.
Besides the four planes?
I haven't seen any convincing evidence for any of the crashes being done by real planes.
Why have you decided to be ignorant?
I have learned to be skeptical. Previously I trusted information from authorities much more without critical thinking. Not anymore.
This is not skepticism. Skepticism is an evidenced based view. You have no evidence.
This is enough for me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc