Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

beachnut said:
Off topic.

And what does this have to do with idiotic failed no-plane lies? Nothing
Click to expand...

Yeah, somewhat off topic. I forgot. Sorry about that. It's a bit related to my no plane scenario though since I believe only the floors supposedly hit by planes were rigged with explosives, kerosene and Thermite (except the large amount of explosives under the basements).
 
Anders Lindman said:
No, only one radar station is mentioned having registered the pressure drop (although I haven't read the entire document). And no, I don't say that they faked radar data to kill people, only that they faked radar data as a part of a massive cover-up in the name of national security.
Click to expand...
Off topic. The topic is...
Titanic Explorer said:
... it comical that the 'No planers' are arguing amongst themslves-insisting their no plane delusion is sound, but the other no planers must be crazy.
Click to expand...

What pressure drop? You don't understand what you are talking about. You are off topic and make no sense. Get on topic now, before all your nonsense ends up in AAH.

There is no cover-up, you don't understand 911 and you are proud of it.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Yeah, somewhat off topic. I forgot. Sorry about that. It's a bit related to my no plane scenario though since I believe only the floors supposedly hit by planes were rigged with explosives, kerosene and Thermite (except the large amount of explosives under the basements).
Click to expand...
It only appears to you to be on topic because you are delusional on 911 issues, and you don't have a clue what on topic would be.

I doubt any of your posts have been on topic.


I find it funny how you no-plane lie pushers all have different crazy claims, and the topic is how they fight each other, and they are both wrong.
 
beachnut said:
Off topic. The topic is...


What pressure drop? You don't understand what you are talking about. You are off topic and make no sense. Get on topic now, before all your nonsense ends up in AAH.

There is no cover-up, you don't understand 911 and you are proud of it.
Click to expand...

The pressure drop (or something like that) shown in the diagram from only one radar station.

The radar data is an important part of the no plane theories. If there were no plane hitting the Pentagon, then that radar data must be faked (or nonexistent). The same with the radar data for the planes allegedly having hit the World Trade Center.
 
beachnut said:
I find it funny how you no-plane lie pushers all have different crazy claims, and the topic is how they fight each other, and they are both wrong.
Click to expand...

I'm NOT claiming that UFOs projected holograms of planes and then fired energy beams to pulverize the towers! :D
 
Anders Lindman said:
The pressure drop (or something like that) shown in the diagram from only one radar station.

The radar data is an important part of the no plane theories. If there were no plane hitting the Pentagon, then that radar data must be faked (or nonexistent). The same with the radar data for the planes allegedly having hit the World Trade Center.
Click to expand...
All the RADAR data is available, you failed to find it. Why do you make up lies? Can you make an on topic post?

The RADAR data was not faked, this is your no-plane idiotic lie. You can't explain how they faked the RADAR data or get back on topic.

Off topic, lies and failure are you only product. If you were on topic you would explain why no-plane factions are fighting. But the topic is about crazy no-plane lies. Who are you warring against to push your lies above the other factions telling lies?


Anders Lindman said:
I'm NOT claiming that UFOs projected holograms of planes and then fired energy beams to pulverize the towers! :D
Click to expand...
Are you warring against the crazier claims, instead of gaining knowledge to learn you are telling lies too. You say data was fake, or imply the data was fake if your delusion was real.

The only thing fake, your claims on 911.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
All the RADAR data is available, you failed to find it.
Click to expand...

I guess all civilian radar data is public information. And then radar data from a large number of radar stations must have been doctored if there were no planes. I have said before that a massive cover-up has been done and is still going on.
 
I was thinking, if there were no planes, then many foreign governments must already know this! And they can use that knowledge to blackmail the U.S. government. :eek:
 
Anders Lindman said:
I guess all civilian radar data is public information. And then radar data from a large number of radar stations must have been doctored if there were no planes. I have said before that a massive cover-up has been done and is still going on.
Click to expand...

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. In fact, more often than not what you say is NOT true. You're like a funny piece of litmus paper, which makes you good for something I guess....
 
Anders Lindman said:
What I'm saying is that a lot of jet fuel should have been splashed across the facade causing a large fire on the outside of the building. As an illustration, imagine a raw egg hitting a tennis racked at very high velocity. All of the egg would not pass through the racked. A fair amount of the egg would splash across the racket.
Click to expand...

Now launch the egg towards the racket at 500 MPH.
 
alienentity said:
Just because you say something doesn't make it true. In fact, more often than not what you say is NOT true. You're like a funny piece of litmus paper, which makes you good for something I guess....
Click to expand...

I'm a bit sloppy sometimes. It would be too burdensome for me to check everything in detail.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I'm a bit sloppy sometimes. It would be too burdensome for me to check everything in detail.
Click to expand...
Why check anything when you are telling lies and disrespecting those who died on 911? Be as disrespectful as you can be, tell some more lies.
Anders Lindman said:
I don't fully understand the diagram. ...
Click to expand...
Indicative of your 911 knowledge. Why don't you check anything? Does that make you the perfect 911 truth member?
 
beachnut said:
Why check anything when you are telling lies and disrespecting those who died on 911? Be as disrespectful as you can be, tell some more lies.
Indicative of your 911 knowledge. Why don't you check anything? Does that make you the perfect 911 truth member?
Click to expand...

Thousands of people have investigated the 911 attacks for a decade. There are probably more things to find out, but then it's likely something that pops up rather than something found through some detailed study.
 
Anders Lindman said:
What I'm saying is that a lot of jet fuel should have been splashed across the facade causing a large fire on the outside of the building. As an illustration, imagine a raw egg hitting a tennis racked at very high velocity. All of the egg would not pass through the racked. A fair amount of the egg would splash across the racket.
Click to expand...

Throw an egg at a tennis racket at 500 mph and see what happens.
 
tsig said:
Throw an egg at a tennis racket at 500 mph and see what happens.
Click to expand...

Even then it would be a splash, if the strings in the racked are strong enough. Picture, if you will, the floors of the WTC towers as strings. Would they be strong 'strings' in that analogy? Yes, they would. You can't have a fragile airliner glide through that 'tennis racket' as if it was made of thin air.

Nor would the wings fold back as one witness said about what he said was an airliner crashing into the Pentagon. That would be just ludicrous. Nor would an airliner plow deep underground and bury itself as they claim has happened near Shanksville. That would hardly even happen in a B-movie. We are talking about reality here I hope.
 
dc1971 said:
Ummmmm, are you sure you would even want to stand in front of an egg moving at 500 mph?

I know I wouldn't!
Click to expand...

That would be pretty lethal. The effect would be almost the same I guess if the building (tennis racket) was moving at 250 mph and the plane (egg) moving at 250 mph toward each other. My point is that why did the building behave as if it was made of thin air?
 
Anders Lindman said:
That would be pretty lethal. The effect would be almost the same I guess if the building (tennis racket) was moving at 250 mph and the plane (egg) moving at 250 mph toward each other. My point is that why did the building behave as if it was made of thin air?
Click to expand...

I guess you're another one to suggest that the laws of physics were broken on that day and that day only! Talk to Professor Judy Wood much?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom