Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

[Craig4]

No, I accuse the U.S. government for a cover-up, not for the attacks.

So they are accomplices to mass murder. Who is actually responsible? Show your work.

 

[Anders Lindman]

A diving & non diving plane doesn't prove that the videos were "faked". They still show a plane flying, reguardless of what you think or say.

Yes it does! The plane was either diving or not. You can't have it both ways.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So they are accomplices to mass murder. Who is actually responsible? Show your work.

No, the cover-up has been done AFTER the attacks. Could that be called protecting mass murderers in legal terms? Maybe, I don't know. The U.S. government could use the 'in the name of national security' excuse as usual though I assume.

 

[Craig4]

Yes it does! The plane was either diving or not. You can't have it both ways.

You're talking about the real ones right not the fake ones? We know about the real one. I'm still unclear on these fake planes.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Yes it does! The plane was either diving or not. You can't have it both ways.

No it doesn't nitwit. So what if the plane was diving or not, that what planes do when they fly, they either dive or they don't. Niether can you!

 

[Craig4]

No, the cover-up has been done AFTER the attacks. Could that be called protecting mass murderers in legal terms? Maybe, I don't know. The U.S. government could use the 'in the name of national security' excuse as usual though I assume.

Oh well I'm sure before you made such a serious allegation you would have done your homework and have acquired extensive evidence. I mean, I'm sure you would not treat anything as serious as this lightly.

 

[Anders Lindman]

See, there you go AGAIN. Looks? All you have is what it LOOKS like to you? What are we to do with "evidence" like that? What would a jury do?

I haven't done a detailed study of the videos. I'm too lazy for that (and lack expert knowledge about such things).

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I haven't done a detailed study of the videos. I'm too lazy for that (and lack expert knowledge about such things).

That explains why you think the videos & photos are "faked", you haven't researched them or looked at them.

Should've told us that in the first place instead of assuming this & that without evidence.

 

[Craig4]

I haven't done a detailed study of the videos. I'm too lazy for that (and lack expert knowledge about such things).

So you feel free to slander people and skip of the graves of the dead without doing any real homework.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Oh well I'm sure before you made such a serious allegation you would have done your homework and have acquired extensive evidence. I mean, I'm sure you would not treat anything as serious as this lightly.

It's extremely serious, but I think it's a huge difference between those responsible for the actual attacks and those who have been forced afterward to do a cover-up. If it was up to me I would let those who have done the cover-up off the hook. Heck, I would even let those responsible for the attacks off the hook, although I understand that some people would want them turned into cat food or something like that.

 

[Craig4]

It's extremely serious, but I think it's a huge difference between those responsible for the actual attacks and those who have been forced afterward to do a cover-up. If it was up to me I would let those who have done the cover-up off the hook. Heck, I would even let those responsible for the attacks off the hook, although I understand that some people would want them turned into cat food or something like that.

Who was responsible for the attacks?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Who was responsible for the attacks?

I wouldn't say companies like Marsh & McLennan and Fuji Bank BUT some individuals within companies like that could have been part of the conspiracy of staging an attack.

 

[Craig4]

I wouldn't say companies like Marsh & McLennan and Fuji Bank BUT some individuals within companies like that could have been part of the conspiracy of staging an attack.

Well then, you must have some evidence then. Please do share.

 

[twinstead]

Well then, you must have some evidence then. Please do share.

That's a rhetorical statement, right?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Yeah, you talk the talk, now walk the walk, show some evidence Anders.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Well then, you must have some evidence then. Please do share.

I believe floor 81 in the South Tower was rigged with tons of Thermite, and Fuji Bank rented that floor. So some Fuji Bank employees may be guilty, but that's just a weak link, but anyway.

 

[Craig4]

I believe floor 81 in the South Tower was rigged with tons of Thermite, and Fuji Bank rented that floor. So some Fuji Bank employees may be guilty, but that's just a weak link, but anyway.

Oh well with that much thermite you'd have to have residue. It would be all over the place. You have some then right?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Oh well with that much thermite you'd have to have residue. It would be all over the place. You have some then right?

Yes. Here for example: http://www.rense.com/general75/thrm.htm

 

[Craig4]

Yes. Here for example: http://www.rense.com/general75/thrm.htm

So that would be no then.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So that would be no then.

Ha. I know that the question about Thermite has been debated for years. But one interesting thing I noticed now is that the Rense article talked about white smoke, and lo and behold, the white smoke came from floor 81! Maybe.