Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

Anders Lindman said:
I haven't seen any video from the 9/11 attack with anything that looks like real planes. It all looks like crude computer graphics animations to me.
Click to expand...
Bizarre. I think you are now just making it up in order to amuse yourself. There was some interest for me in this thread due a potential discrepancy regarding engine type, but since you are saying the above (quoted) I don't think there is any point in having any dialogue with you.

You're either a troll or someone in need of medical help.

Incidentally I have a friend of mine who was working for one of the universities in NY who witnessed the second plane hit and is now a professor of neuroscience. Would you like to leave your brain for medical research one day? Perhaps we could then see why you say what you say.
 
A W Smith said:
links? I pasted the entire page here so he couldn't ignore it. He did anyway. Said he would rather talk about the engines. Dont bother bringing it up, his ass is still hurting. He's falling faster than freefall Acceleration.
Click to expand...

Must be where they stuck the rocket.
 
Sunstealer said:
Incidentally I have a friend of mine who was working for one of the universities in NY who witnessed the second plane hit and is now a professor of neuroscience. Would you like to leave your brain for medical research one day? Perhaps we could then see why you say what you say.
Click to expand...

This premise relies on a large assumption.... a certain strawman once sang about this problem.:cool:
 
Sunstealer said:
Bizarre. I think you are now just making it up in order to amuse yourself. There was some interest for me in this thread due a potential discrepancy regarding engine type, but since you are saying the above (quoted) I don't think there is any point in having any dialogue with you.

You're either a troll or someone in need of medical help.

Incidentally I have a friend of mine who was working for one of the universities in NY who witnessed the second plane hit and is now a professor of neuroscience. Would you like to leave your brain for medical research one day? Perhaps we could then see why you say what you say.
Click to expand...

I've talked to A LOT of people about 9/11 locally. Pretty much everyone who was in Manhattan or had a view of the towers that day saw the South Tower get hit as they watched the North Tower burn.

If they crashed into a water tower in the middle of the Rockies, maybe he'd have a case for no eyewitnesses. In Manhattan, at 9am on a regular working Tuesday, no *********** way. You would have to be retarded to think otherwise.
 
The no planer factions - fantasies at war.

It cost a beer a quote...

wtc1impact.jpg

The suck a plane hole explosives - including fireball effects - 2.5 million. How can 911 truth be so dumb? How in the heck do they imagine explosives which suck in metal walls, and have 10,000 gallons of jet fuel fire balls?
 
beachnut said:
The no planer factions - fantasies at war.

It cost a beer a quote...

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/wtc1impact.jpg[/qimg]
The suck a plane hole explosives - including fireball effects - 2.5 million. How can 911 truth be so dumb? How in the heck do they imagine explosives which suck in metal walls, and have 10,000 gallons of jet fuel fire balls?
Click to expand...

They're a couple short of a six-pack, my friend.
 
AJM8125 said:
Another evidence-free assertion. Truthers are so delusional.
Click to expand...

I think truthers at least have started to question the traditional authorities instead of like the sheeple just blindly swallow everything unquestionably. I myself am probably still gullible in some areas, and still a sheeple in many ways, but I have started to question some things that to me could be what Hitler called 'big lies': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

"... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation."
 
Anders Lindman said:
I think truthers at least have started to question the traditional authorities instead of like the sheeple just blindly swallow everything unquestionably. I myself am probably still gullible in some areas, and still a sheeple in many ways, but I have started to question some things that to me could be what Hitler called 'big lies': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

"... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation."
Click to expand...

You're about 5 years behind the curve and now you're starting to quote Hitler?

:nope:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom