Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

Sunstealer said:
What type and model should have been on it? Please list the models that are certified to fly on B767-222ER.
Click to expand...

Surely they must know exactly what kind of engines used on the planes they claim crashed into the WTC towers. With maintenance records and all kinds of things like that. With exact serial numbers on all the parts etc.

What I'm looking for is an official statement clearly stating that the jet engine found near Ground Zero (what was left of it) has been confirmed to be the one of those used on the planes they claim crashed into the WTC towers.
 
Anders Lindman said:
What I'm looking for is an official statement clearly stating that the jet engine found near Ground Zero (what was left of it) has been confirmed to be the one of those used on the planes they claim crashed into the WTC towers.
Click to expand...


RU sure you want that official statement? If it were available, I'm 100% certain you would declare it a false document and dismiss it.

That's what you've done with everything else. Why should we expect anything different?:D
 
Anders Lindman said:
"it appeared to be level with us"

What plane would be level with a building in NYC?! :confused:
Click to expand...
The one about to hit the building. Good question.

The ones climbing out of NYC, the ones landing at NYC. very good question, and very easy answer...
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
And then there is this incredible find: http://i662.photobucket.com/albums/uu347/911conspiracytv/NYSMuseum_aircraft_part.jpg

"Unknown Airline Piece"
Click to expand...
It's not part of the landing gear, it's a compressor ring that holds compressor blades (as evidenced by the dovetail slots) which will be part of the compressor drum. Not all sections that hold compressor blades are disks. Depends on the engine.

Just because the title says unknown doesn't mean that it's unknown.

Why don't you email the museum and ask them for the part no/serial no? Most likely to be found on the inner or outer face of the flange. (top part with the holes in.)

There is some black writing on the inner surface too. Is that an identification or is it confirmation of serial no. Again why not write and ask.
 
Anders Lindman said:
So banks have entire floors filled batteries just for UPS backup? I doubt that.
Click to expand...
What are the electric requirements? Take that figure and you got a floor full of servers and UPS. If I wanted to keep my computers on line in power outages, lasing 8 hours, I would require about a room full of UPS. If I had enough servers to run a bank or business, I would require an entire floor.

Thermite leaves Fe as a product. No piles of Fe were found, no Fe fused to steel was found. How many tons of thermite were used in your fantasy?

In your fantasy, how do they get witnesses to see flight 11 and 175 with their eyes? Thousands saw flight 175, and they are not liars as you have to say in your delusion.


Anders Lindman said:
And then there is this incredible find: http://i662.photobucket.com/albums/uu347/911conspiracytv/NYSMuseum_aircraft_part.jpg

"Unknown Airline Piece"

Unknown? :confused: Were the investigators complete morons? :mad: If I were a U.S. citizen I would be really upset about how the 9/11 investigation has been done.
Click to expand...
Americans figured out who the terrorists were in minutes, a feat you can't do given years. Really, we figured out who the terrorist were right away, and you can't do it given over 9 years. I think the investigation beat you by 9 years, and it only took minutes for Flight 93 passengers to figure out 911 correctly and take action; what is your excuse?

Only unknown to you, it is part of an engine. If you were a US citizen... Thank goodness truthers are a worldwide problem; thank goodness there are paranoid conspiracy theorists all over. Why don't you know anything about flying, aircraft, batteries, computers, banking, wall street, WTC, terrorists, UBL, and more? Good luck, being a no-plane person, I assume you are faking it, putting us on. You can't lack that much knowledge and logic and be able to type, own a computer, turn on a computer, pay for and have an internet account; or can you?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Ok, with an airport close to the buildings there would of course be planes flying low. I still maintain my position that all witnesses of real planes in the 9/11 attack are false.
Click to expand...

If you believe them to be "false", then you never existed either.

Therefore you were never concieved!
 
I still maintain my position that all witnesses of real planes in the 9/11 attack are false
Click to expand...

This is really all we need to hear. The ONLY reason why you claim they are "false" is because their very existence threatens your position. You have NO other reason to claim that. This is what ideologues and fools do, not "investigators"
 
Last edited:
alienentity said:
RU sure you want that official statement? If it were available, I'm 100% certain you would declare it a false document and dismiss it.

That's what you've done with everything else. Why should we expect anything different?:D
Click to expand...

If the official statement says that the jet engine is not the type used on a Boeing 767, then that would be interesting indeed.
 
Sunstealer said:
It's not part of the landing gear, it's a compressor ring that holds compressor blades (as evidenced by the dovetail slots) which will be part of the compressor drum. Not all sections that hold compressor blades are disks. Depends on the engine.

Just because the title says unknown doesn't mean that it's unknown.

Why don't you email the museum and ask them for the part no/serial no? Most likely to be found on the inner or outer face of the flange. (top part with the holes in.)

There is some black writing on the inner surface too. Is that an identification or is it confirmation of serial no. Again why not write and ask.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's what I thought. The part is not from a landing gear. It's almost as if the museum has made as stupid text as possible. I get the feeling they are screaming: "Look, people, it's a LIE!!!" :)
 
Anders Lindman said:
If the official statement says that the jet engine is not the type used on a Boeing 767, then that would be interesting indeed.
Click to expand...

I don't envy you even a little. Since you've already demonstrated that you don't believe anything that is offered, you can never know anything, but you certainly can not-know everything. But why someone would choose this approach defies belief....

This no-planer thing is like self-inflicted brain damage.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Ok, with an airport close to the buildings there would of course be planes flying low. I still maintain my position that all witnesses of real planes in the 9/11 attack are false.

Important distinction though: I believe most of the false witnesses are NOT part of the initial conspiracy and instead a part of the massive cover-up that took place after the initial attack and that has continued to this day.
Click to expand...

My friend who watched the second plane hit, told me to tell you, he thinks you're a moron.
 
beachnut said:
Americans figured out who the terrorists were in minutes, a feat you can't do given years.
Click to expand...

Yeah, like the news anchor who very early on said that it was too early to speculate about a terrorist event, but at the same time he said that Osama Bin Laden comes to mind. lol.
 
Justin39640 said:
My friend who watched the second plane hit, told me to tell you, he thinks you're a moron.
Click to expand...

He probably only wants to protect himself. If he admitted that he saw a fireball explosion without any plane flying into the tower, people with think of him as crazy or at least as being a kook or a liar. So he dares not admit that there was no plane. That's my guess.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Yeah, like the news anchor who very early on said that it was too early to speculate about a terrorist event, but at the same time he said that Osama Bin Laden comes to mind. lol.
Click to expand...

Within seconds of the second plane hitting, Howard Stern started screaming we were under attack. I guess he got the text too huh?
 
Justin39640 said:
When the two floors above them are filled with servers, you better believe it. http://engineeringdynamics.com/services.asp
They are there to last for hours in case of power failure.
Click to expand...

What stupidity to use expensive office space in a skyscraper in Manhattan for a huge amount of computer servers and a whole floor filled with UPS batteries. Imagine Google building their computer centers like that. LMAO.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom