Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

Anders Lindman said:
I only responded to a question about Thermite. IMO those were not batteries but instead boxes of Thermite, covering an entire floor! And exactly that same floor from which molten metal can be seen pouring out in a video. Coincidence? I don't think so. Fake information? Could be. But it could also be accurate information. One thing I believe is clear: those were NOT batteries. Why would a bank need to fill a whole floor with UPS batteries? It doesn't compute.
Click to expand...
except no one saw an entire floor of this
773px-ThermiteFe2O3.JPG
 
Anders Lindman said:
I only responded to a question about Thermite. IMO those were not batteries but instead boxes of Thermite, covering an entire floor! And exactly that same floor from which molten metal can be seen pouring out in a video. Coincidence? I don't think so. Fake information? Could be. But it could also be accurate information. One thing I believe is clear: those were NOT batteries. Why would a bank need to fill a whole floor with UPS batteries? It doesn't compute.
Click to expand...
They need that many batteries because it take that much electricity to have back up. Ask an IT person, ask an engineer. You base your opinion on your opinions, not facts.

... you will figure this out when you have an electric car, and see why gasoline is 10 times better than batteries...

There were no products of thermite found. You are wrong.

The topic is about the failed no-plane claims, how they conflict with each other and reality, like your thermite delusion.
 
tsig said:
From the link:

The two airplanes that struck the twin towers of the World Trade Center on 9/11 flew directly into secure computer rooms in both buildings. Is that simply a coincidence or were the computer rooms equipped to play a role in the crime?

So no need to plant anything then.
Click to expand...

Equipped, yes (at least one floor in each tower), with tons of Thermite. No real airplane used.
 
tsig said:
Why?
Click to expand...

This is going off topic, but how much backup power does a bank really need? A bank, like every other corporation, would do things as cost-effectively as possible, and to allocate an entire floor of as I assume super-expensive office space for just UPS batteries sounds implausible to me. What for? To power the entire World Trade Center in the case of power failure?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Flying at the same level as the buildings in NYC and towards the buildings? Sounds incredible.
Click to expand...

Dude, the airport is in Queens. How else do you think planes land? They fly at low altitude.

This is not news.

Anyway, several people in the towers saw the planes coming. They were there, and you weren't. I think we'll take their word over yours, thank you very much.

Continue to call them all liars, it just makes you a fool. It's what you do.
 
Just for giggles, read this comment on epinions about the airport. Anders, you're such a waste of time.
'For those flying in and out of LaGuardia, try to get yourself a window seat. Honestly, there is nothing like the views that the flight path this airport entails. Every time I fly in or out of LaGuardia, I am treated to beautiful views of Manhattan, the State of Liberty, and the Gold Coast of Long Island. When the Mets are playing, prepare yourself for a glimpse of the game - the LaGuardia flight path often takes you right over Shea Stadium (or Citifield). And depending on which runway is being used, you will also get a decent view of the famous maximum-security jail, Riker's Island. '

http://www.epinions.com/review/LaGuardia_International_Airport_epi/content_456743947908
 
alienentity said:
Dude, the airport is in Queens. How else do you think planes land? They fly at low altitude.

This is not news.

Anyway, several people in the towers saw the planes coming. They were there, and you weren't. I think we'll take their word over yours, thank you very much.

Continue to call them all liars, it just makes you a fool. It's what you do.
Click to expand...

Ok, with an airport close to the buildings there would of course be planes flying low. I still maintain my position that all witnesses of real planes in the 9/11 attack are false.

Important distinction though: I believe most of the false witnesses are NOT part of the initial conspiracy and instead a part of the massive cover-up that took place after the initial attack and that has continued to this day.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Ok, with an airport close to the buildings there would of course be planes flying low. I still maintain my position that all witnesses of real planes in the 9/11 attack are false.
Click to expand...

Yes, of course you do. You wouldn't be making idiotic claims if you were logical and could perceive normal reality.

You're accusing 100% of the eyewitnesses of lying. Beautiful delusional stuff.
And par-for-the-course for no-planers.
 
alienentity said:
Yes, of course you do. You wouldn't be making idiotic claims if you were logical and could perceive normal reality.

You're accusing 100% of the eyewitnesses of lying. Beautiful delusional stuff.
And par-for-the-course for no-planers.
Click to expand...

I want to again stress the distinction between what I believe is the initial conspiracy and the second part which is the massive cover-up.

Instead of getting caught up in the second part, with many eyewitnesses and tons of other things that confirm the official story, I want to get back to the question about the jet engine found near Ground Zero. What type/model of jet engine is it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom