AlaskaBushPilot
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 4,341
One thing that has puzzled me about the 1951 Shipton Expedition is the (Yeti) trackway photo. These tracks look like giant ox hooves or dinosaur but they are forwarded as "Yeti tracks". Another photo shows a close-up of a track and it looks nothing like the ones in the trackway.
Has anyone said anything about the absurdly obvious differences and that the single-file trackway doesn't even look hominoid, let alone primate?
[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/c6ab497a.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/03eda368.jpg[/qimg]
That's pretty weird.
In a situation of terrain and snow like that a trackway can get pretty distorted by the sunshine melting the track.
Check the black rocks and how the snow around them has melted. You can guage the age of tracks by looking around to see how much distortion they have relative to the things you know are going to really heat up like those rocks.
When the snow is compressed it absorbs the sun better. If they're packed down to where the sun can radiate off the ground a little bit then the prints are going to get really big and look nothing like the originals.
But the picture with the climbing axe is very new by comparison. Kind of a C+ fake print on the scale from extremely stupid to 8th grade level foot-carving (the latter being the highest award level known to date).