Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

Ha. I mean no planes at all were used in the 911 attacks. For example, flight 175 was still being tracked on radar flying in the air after it supposed to have crashed into one of the WTC towers.

Have you done a search to find out how many times this stupid idea has been hashed over? Or, have you run out of ideas and you have to revert backwards to keep the attention on you?
 
So, if the Boeing 767 plane used PW4062, check this out: http://gorod.tomsk.ru/uploads/50838/1280329246/1685473.jpg

(From: http://gorod.tomsk.ru/index-1280339872.php )

Compare with the engine found near ground zero: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/images2/wtc16.jpg

It looks puny in comparison!
You have no clue what a jet engine looks like after a 2093 pounds of TNT kinetic energy impact. You have no clue the fan section was destroyed on impact, or what a core of a jet engine looks like. you lost this one based on ignorance.

CFM-56
CFM56.jpg

Darn, it is not a CFM-56 either! The core on the street is PW engine, sorry, the photo is clear a PW core. Good luck with the NO-Plane lie, it is as stupid as beam weapons and demolition, the other failed 911 truth lies. Based on your failed logic, the engine is too big to be the little engine on the street, it can't be your hero Nila's failed engine.
 
Last edited:
Good point. Personally I believe no planes at all were used in the 911 attacks. See for example: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=186212

Where are the four jet engines from the two airliners (flight 11 and 175 if I remember correctly) that allegedly crashed into the WTC towers? Did three of the jet engines evaporate into thin air (like all the black boxes)? I don't think so. And the one jet engine that was found some blocks away from ground zero looks suspiciously planted (for example too small engine and of wrong type some people say).

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed personal remark
I saw a plane fly into the WTC with my own eyes. But don't listen to me, I am probably a paid CIA shill. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because the perpetrators didn't perhaps have access to the right type of engine.

So the perps were able to pull off the inside jobby job but couldn't acquire four 767 engines?
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed personal remark
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A jet engine for a Boeing 767 is not something that they could buy at Walmart. I believe the perpetrators were a shadow group with access to and control over key areas such as some of the floors in the WTC towers and a centralized Media Control Center in New York City where the live video feeds from the 5 major television networks were manipulated for a short period of time, but not much more power than that and not access to many types of jet engines.

Anybody with money can get jet engines,
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed personal remark
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have you done a search to find out how many times this stupid idea has been hashed over? Or, have you run out of ideas and you have to revert backwards to keep the attention on you?

If this idea has been hashed over so many times, why can't anyone provide some official statement about the type of jet engine found? Heck, I'm going to send an e-mail to NTSB. Hold on a second... Done. :) I filled in a request form on the NTSB website asking them what type the jet engine found near ground zero is.
 
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed personal remark
I saw a plane fly into the WTC with my own eyes. But don't listen to me, I am probably a paid CIA shill. :rolleyes:

I want to point out that I don't believe the CIA or any other U.S. agency was directly involved in the 9/11 attack. My theory is that it was an inside job carried out by a shadow group consisting of members who don't belong to any particular organization, agency or even any particular country.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want to point out that I don't believe the CIA or any other U.S. agency was directly involved in the 9/11 attack. My theory is that it was an inside job carried out by a shadow group consisting of members who don't belong to any particular organization, agency or even any particular country.
Your fantasy, based on ignorance and the need for a paranoid conspiracy theory.

The evidence proves you wrong, your shallow research assures your continued ignorance.
 
I assume this piece was at Freshkills, but I don't know. I don't even know if it's a different piece from the one on Murray St., although it appears to be.

ny_wtc_588.jpg
 
Here's some eyewitness testimony about another engine part, not the Murray St. one. I was incorrect about the woman, she was injured (crushed) by landing gear, not engine parts.

'We just passed a compact car where the engine was running and the door was open, which looked to me like the driver had escaped, but from the back seat to the trunk was crushed by a jet engine. We started going up West Street. I believe that's when Smitty ran over the part of the plane, but he did that to avoid the bodies because there were obviously bodies in the street. FDNY firefighter Michael Hazel


There was a car that we drove by that the driver's door and the passenger door were open, and there was a plane motor on the back half of the car. Two inches more, and both these guys would have been dead too. That was their ticket. It was amazing. The car was actually cut right in half with this motor, right there back of the front seat. I sat there in amazement. FDNY firefighter Richard Saulle'
 
I don't know if this first image is a piece of landing gear or engine. Anybody?
Found on the roof of a nearby building along with other plane debris.

fb-175-parts4.jpg


Some of this material (FEMA) appears to be aircraft engine parts as well

45_435-large.jpg
 
Anders, it's very hard to imagine how else a jet engine could land on top of a car (post 213) if it didn't come from a flying jet.

You're not suggesting that the engine was lifted on a crane and dropped there, are you?
 
Anders, it's very hard to imagine how else a jet engine could land on top of a car (post 213) if it didn't come from a flying jet.

You're not suggesting that the engine was lifted on a crane and dropped there, are you?

The jet engine and the landing gear were planted inside the WTC tower. Watch this short video clip and listen to the sharp bang at the moment the jet engine and the landing gear shoot out of the building like cannonballs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0Qu6eyyr4c

The bang heard in the clip indicates explosives used to make the jet engine and the landing gear shoot out of the tower like that.
 
The jet engine and the landing gear were planted inside the WTC tower. Watch this short video clip and listen to the sharp bang at the moment the jet engine and the landing gear shoot out of the building like cannonballs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0Qu6eyyr4c

The bang heard in the clip indicates explosives used to make the jet engine and the landing gear shoot out of the tower like that.

Sorry, I'm not buying it. That is completely absurd.
Aren't you forgetting the people inside the towers who saw planes flying at them? Oh, but you're a no-planer - I've forgotten how crazy no-planers really are. My bad.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I'm not buying it. That is completely absurd.
Aren't you forgetting the people inside the towers who saw planes flying at them? Oh, but you're a no-planer - I've forgotten how crazy no-planers really are. My bad.

Think of it as a relatively simple 'David Copperfield' trick, with planted objects to fool the 'audience' and planted actors pretending to be witnesses, such as: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMelmLspMP0 who incredibly survived by taking cover under a desk (?!).
 

Back
Top Bottom