Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

AJM8125 said:
Surely you know that isn't a complete engine assembly.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I thought of that, that it is perhaps only the core of the engine but still, I haven't seen any official statement of what engine type it is that actually was found. Just to be absolutely sure that some terrorist organization didn't plant misleading evidence, it would be wise to at least confirm through experts that the jet engine found matches the type used on flight 175.
 
Sunstealer said:
I started to do some digging. Basically what I've found is that the engine in the picture looks to be a P&W JTD9 - 7A/7F/7J due to the HPT 1 cooling duct assembly. The info on aircraft N612UA seems to be that it was flying with JT9D-7R4D. So there appears to be a discrepancy which is feeding the conspiracy nuts because they equate the JT9D-7R4D with a 767-200 and a JTD9 - 7A/7F/7J with a 747. The fact is that a JTD9 - 7A/7F/7J isn't exclusive to a 747 but can be used on a 767-200.

I don't think there will be any information regarding engine maintenance or changes on the net because this is proprietary airline information. Even if it was available I would expect it to be drowned out by a sea of truther crap.

It looks to me that either the aircraft had an engine(s) changed or there is a mod to the JT9D-7R4D HPT Stage 1 cooling duct assembly.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you know some about this. What surprises me is that why hasn't some official expert(s) determined exactly what type of jet engine it is that was found near ground zero? I read somewhere that all parts on planes like that have a serial number or something like that engraved on them.
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
Sounds like you know some about this. What surprises me is that why hasn't some official expert(s) determined exactly what type of jet engine it is that was found near ground zero? I read somewhere that all parts on planes like that have a serial number or something like that engraved on them.
Click to expand...
Well I wouldn't say that because until Beachnut provided the answer to what engines were fitted then I didn't know. All I'd have to do now is to match the section to PW4062 from a parts catalogue.

All parts have serial numbers. The thing is you are thinking like a conspiracy theorist. Why would it be important to identify the engine parts found in the street? It's obvious that they came from one of the aircraft - what does it matter?
 
Sunstealer said:
Well I wouldn't say that because until Beachnut provided the answer to what engines were fitted then I didn't know. All I'd have to do now is to match the section to PW4062 from a parts catalogue.

All parts have serial numbers. The thing is you are thinking like a conspiracy theorist. Why would it be important to identify the engine parts found in the street? It's obvious that they came from one of the aircraft - what does it matter?
Click to expand...

Imagine a crime scene where a weapon is found. It wouldn't be enough to say: it's obvious that this is the weapon used. A thorough investigation is needed.
 
Hey, has anyone figured out that Anders has not found an official report regarding the type of engine found at Church and Murray street?

What did the airline say when you contacted them? I mean if you have enough time to repeat the same irrelevant claim 14 posts in a row, you certainly should have enough time to get off your ass and do some research beyond investagoogling.
 
AJM8125 said:
How do you know it wasn't?
Click to expand...

I would be satisfied if I find, or if someone points to, some official statement confirming exactly what kind of jet engine was found near ground zero. The problem is that so far I haven't seen any such official statement.
 
Anders Lindman said:
So, if the Boeing 767 plane used PW4062, check this out: http://gorod.tomsk.ru/uploads/50838/1280329246/1685473.jpg

(From: http://gorod.tomsk.ru/index-1280339872.php )

Compare with the engine found near ground zero: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/images2/wtc16.jpg

It looks puny in comparison!
Click to expand...

So you're wondering why no one checked to see if was from a different airplane that crashed into New York City that day. As I recall there were only two airplanes that crashed into stuff in New York City that day. I'm trying to imagine that conversation. "Do you think we should check to see if this came from one of the jets that hit the World Trade Center." "Yeah you know it might be connected."

The mind reels.
 
16.5 said:
Hey, has anyone figured out that Anders has not found an official report regarding the type of engine found at Church and Murray street?

What did the airline say when you contacted them? I mean if you have enough time to repeat the same irrelevant claim 14 posts in a row, you certainly should have enough time to get off your ass and do some research beyond investagoogling.
Click to expand...

Not the airline but it could be a good idea to send an e-mail to some U.S. agency responsible for the 911 investigation and ask them directly. I need to do some more searches on the web first. I may have missed it.
 
Craig4 said:
You mean no planes besides the four we know about right?
Click to expand...

Ha. I mean no planes at all were used in the 911 attacks. For example, flight 175 was still being tracked on radar flying in the air after it supposed to have crashed into one of the WTC towers.
 
based on the evidence that we have, the best theory soo far is that a plane did indeed crash in Shanksville.

until evidence of something else comes forward, this is what we must go with.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Those links do not point to any official statement of what type of engine it is that was found on Church & Murray Street near ground zero.
Click to expand...
You have to do research and use logic. Which 911 truth fails at; why are you unable to make rational conclusions based on facts. The NTSB is pretty "official".

Anders Lindman said:
Ha. I mean no planes at all were used in the 911 attacks. For example, flight 175 was still being tracked on radar flying in the air after it supposed to have crashed into one of the WTC towers.
Click to expand...
A lie made up to fool idiots. You offer zero evidence, and have nothing. You were fooled by idiots who have delusions.

That was not RADAR, you have no clue what RADAR is. The RADAR track shows 175 impacting the WTC, you were fooled by an idiot who tricked you. Better work on your knowledge of what RADAR is and not used internet tracking programs as your source of woo.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
You have to do research and use logic. Which 911 truth fails at; why are you unable to make rational conclusions based on facts. The NTSB is pretty "official".
Click to expand...

Are you saying that NTSB has officially confirmed what type of jet engine was found near ground zero?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom