Merged Theory links Newtonian/Quantum the amazing Frank Znidarsic

[khan2012]

ok, back to the topic...

khan2012, what do you make of FZs papers?

I wonder if it is possible to derive Newton's universal gravitational constant G - using Znidarsic's transitional velocity constant V_t

 

[Chronopolitan]

I wonder if it is possible to derive Newton's universal gravitational constant G - using Znidarsic's transitional velocity constant V_t

Well, off you go! Take a bunch of equations and solve the puzzle

But seriously, what he tries to do is to transform Planck's Constant into an equation that holds the possibility to be used in something that makes sense.

Why don't you try to derive some values that actually matter?

Let's calculate some radii of bigger atoms or something like that.

 

[TubbaBlubba]

Aw, look at them, playing with the crackpot papers.

 

[MattusMaximus]

*yawn*

 

[Chronopolitan]

I haven't seen any of you actually using "vt" to test the crackpot theory on various stuff.

Please do me the favor and try.

 

[MattusMaximus]

I haven't seen any of you actually using "vt" to test the crackpot theory on various stuff.

Please do me the favor and try.

The people espousing the "v_t theory" should be the ones attempting to test it, not us. The burden of proof is upon them to provide evidence for their claims; so far, as you said, all we've seen here is crackpot stuff. Not very impressive.

 

[Chronopolitan]

The people espousing the "v_t theory" should be the ones attempting to test it, not us. The burden of proof is upon them to provide evidence for their claims; so far, as you said, all we've seen here is crackpot stuff. Not very impressive.

Something I found:
http://jila.colorado.edu/content/mysterious-fermi-gap

Maybe you want to try using "vt" with that one...
You're the physicist, please do me the favor.

 

[TubbaBlubba]

Planck's constant times my girth* gives the solution for the universal field equation.


Disprove that, "physicists"!

*May be interpreted according to taste.

 

[khan2012]

A working prototype needs to be constructed and plans distributed freely. Forget about the patent office...

 

[MattusMaximus]

A working prototype needs to be constructed and plans distributed freely. Forget about the patent office...

Key word there... it implies that the device actually works.

 

[MattusMaximus]

Something I found:
http://jila.colorado.edu/content/mysterious-fermi-gap

Maybe you want to try using "vt" with that one...
You're the physicist, please do me the favor.

No. Ask FZ to do it; it's his theory after all. The burden of proof is upon him to justify the correctness of his ideas, not upon the rest of the world to prove those ideas are wrong. Period.

 

[Chronopolitan]

Planck's constant times my girth* gives the solution for the universal field equation.


Disprove that, "physicists"!

*May be interpreted according to taste.

Well, how about this one:

We are able to see about 13.700.000.000 lightyears into space.
That accounts for every direction.
We are at the center of a sphere with that radius.
This distance equals the distance light has traveled after the "Big Bang" (minus the horizon we cannot look behind)
That's what people say.

So, NOW is on earth, the rest is the past.

From "outside" (which doesn't exist), the universe started as a singularity (where laws are not applicable) then created spacetime and expanded rapidly since. From "outside", NOW is at the edge of the expanding universe.

It is not possible to take on both views at the same time unless you consider both the edge of the universe and its center the same.... point.

A point without a reference frame does not exist unless it's a singularity.

Therefore, there is only singularity. (Which can be interpreted as... let's say, G*D).

 

[MattusMaximus]

Well, how about this one:

We are able to see about 13.700.000.000 lightyears into space.
That accounts for every direction.
We are at the center of a sphere with that radius.
This distance equals the distance light has traveled after the "Big Bang" (minus the horizon we cannot look behind)
That's what people say.

Wrong, this is a common misconception. You neglect to take into account the expansion of spacetime since the big bang, so the distance this light has traveled is actually closer to 46 billion LY - here's a reference on this point.

So, NOW is on earth, the rest is the past.

A more accurate way to say it is that the further away we look, the further back in time we are seeing due to the finite speed of light. This applies on Earth just as much as beyond Earth; it's only a question of degree.

From "outside" (which doesn't exist), the universe started as a singularity (where laws are not applicable) then created spacetime and expanded rapidly since. From "outside", NOW is at the edge of the expanding universe.

You really need to read up more on the idea of a cosmic horizon - here's something to get you started: observable universe and Hubble volume.

It is not possible to take on both views at the same time unless you consider both the edge of the universe and its center the same.... point.

A point without a reference frame does not exist unless it's a singularity.

This seems like gibberish to me.

Therefore, there is only singularity. (Which can be interpreted as... let's say, G*D).

The Religion & Philosophy subforum is that-a-way ==>

 

[khan2012]

alienscientist.com/ag2.html

Frank Znidarsic and The Velocity of the Transitional Quantum State

Frank Znidarsic noticed that when you multiplied the frequency times the wavelength in both the Podkletnov, and the Cold Fusion experiments, the same velocity emerged... After puzzling over what this Velocity could be, he got some insight from reading the book "What is Quantum Mechanics" by the LEX foundation in which they talked about the Transitional Quantum state and how the Velocity of the Transitional Quantum state is unknown. Frank reasoned that this velocity was that of the Quantum Transition and worked out a method by which it could be used to derive Planck's Constant.


[...]

alienscientist.com/ag4.html


The Transitional Quantum State It consists of a vibrating Bose condensate. The vibration of a Bose condensate at this dimensional frequency of 1.094 megahertz-meters appears to increase the strength of the phonons that bind the condensate. This increased strength invites nuclear participation. Superconductors and proton conductors can be externally vibrated to harness the effect. This new understanding of the process of the quantum transition may allow a multi-bodied macroscopic object to be placed into a state of quantum transition. Trillions of atoms may be enjoined within a single state of quantum transition. Strong gravitational and long-range nuclear effects will be produced. The long-range nuclear effects may be used for the production of energy and the reduction of nuclear waste. The strong gravitational effects may be used for propulsion.

 

[jsfisher]

alienscientist.com/ag2.html

Frank Znidarsic and The Velocity of the Transitional Quantum State
...
The Transitional Quantum State It consists of a vibrating Bose condensate. The vibration of a Bose condensate at this dimensional frequency of 1.094 megahertz-meters appears to increase the strength of the phonons that bind the condensate.

Well, so frequency is measured in MegaHertz-meters these days. Who knew? Should make for an even more interesting result when you multiply frequency by wavelength.

 

[khan2012]

On some web pages V_t is referred to as 1.094 x 10⁶ meters/sec

 

[jsfisher]

On some web pages V_t is referred to as 1.094 x 10⁶ meters/sec

Could be, but right there in the section you quoted and then I highlighted, it is frequency that's being discussed.

 

[MattusMaximus]

Could be, but right there in the section you quoted and then I highlighted, it is frequency that's being discussed.

You got your frequency in my velocity!

 

[MattusMaximus]

alienscientist.com/ag2.html

From your link...

... Frank Znidarsic rearranged Coulomb's constants into the form of the elastic energy of a spring. together they equal a group constant K. The variable 1/r remains the same. The strength of the electric field varies with distance r away from the electron and this is reflected in this variable elastic constant. The speed of sound also varies at different locations within the electron. ...

Wrong, the electric field varies as 1/r² around an electron (or any other point-like source charge). For a "physicist" doing such important research to not understand this basic teaching from high school physics is kind of laughable.

... The condition of the velocity of light was set equal to the condition produced by the velocity of sound within the nuclear and thus, electronic structure. The velocity of a wave in medium is determined by the stiffness of that medium. The greater the strength of the forces within the medium, the faster the wave propagates. This is why sound travels faster in steel than in water. In the case where all the waves are going at the same velocity the strength of the forces between the components is the same. This implies that the strength of the electromagnetic, gravitomagentic, and nuclear forces converge under this condition. ...

FZ seems to be confusing the elasticity of a medium and the speed at which sound waves propagate through it with the index of refraction of a medium and the speed at which light travels through it. The mechanisms are different, yet he seems to indicate they're the same. And can anyone name one material in which light & sound travel at the same velocity? WTF

And then there's more mish-mash of talk about gravitational anomalies, Bose-Einstein condensates, and the like. More of the same crankery, it seems. If this is the best that FZ can do, it's no wonder I've never heard of him before.

Message to FZ:

 

[khan2012]

From your link...

Wrong, the electric field varies as 1/r² around an electron (or any other point-like source charge).

That seems to be a really huge mistake on the part of the AlienScientist, yes...

Damn sloppy