Merged UFO @ Jerusalem, 2011. Call Captain-D

manniequinn your link doesn't work. If it did I will assume that it's video 4 not video 3, that would explain why you see cars :D

ETA: fixed your link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vw5vB7Ppfw

Notice the title : Jerusalem UFO update - Three angles on synch - 4th footage Ultimate proof

And yea I was right.
 
Last edited:
Angel Love said:
No it's not as we clearly have fake UFO videos here, end of story, somehow I think not. Let's see what comes next. :)
Click to expand...
I'm not saying "end of story"... far from it.
I'm saying that any examination of the footage by sceptics and any critical analysis it comes under is above and beyond what is required.
As for the story, it wouldn't matter if the people who made the story up came forward and admitted it. There would still be many people who would claim they were lying. It's all a part of what makes the subject so fascinating.
 
manniequinn said:
well sorry but if it was a picture how come in this video "wwwyoutubecom/watch?v=3Vw5vB7Ppfw&feature=related" at 1:04-1:06 you can see cars driving in the middle video. look very closely for all you experts at analyzing videos
Click to expand...
Welcome to the forum Manniequinn.
As Angel Love has said, the middle video (video 4) is actually a video.
The still photo was used for video number 3.

But if you believe the event to be genuine, I await with excited antici...



.... pation, your analysis to show how everything is perfectly in place and to be expected in a video.
 
Angel Love said:
manniequinn your link doesn't work. If it did I will assume that it's video 4 not video 3, that would explain why you see cars :D

ETA: fixed your link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vw5vB7Ppfw

Notice the title : Jerusalem UFO update - Three angles on synch - 4th footage Ultimate proof

And yea I was right.
Click to expand...


It looks like it's pretty easy to sync the two side by side videos it that latest Earth shattering presentation...
They look to be the exact same source video, except one has some poor schlep standing around in it, and the other is using the newest 'jiggle-cam' technology... :boggled:
Stray seems to have effortlessly over shadowed the woo factor of the other video. ;)
And, Ms. Mississippi looks to have been just plain banished from the island.
 
Last edited:
Stray Cat said:
I'm not saying "end of story"... far from it.
I'm saying that any examination of the footage by sceptics and any critical analysis it comes under is above and beyond what is required.
As for the story, it wouldn't matter if the people who made the story up came forward and admitted it. There would still be many people who would claim they were lying. It's all a part of what makes the subject so fascinating.
Click to expand...

You misunderstood, I was agreeing with you but also pondering on what will come next. It is fascinating indeed. :)
 
Sceptic Tank said:
I know this has been conclusively debunked, but...



The camera is neither centred nor still, so this argument falls at the first and second hurdles.
Click to expand...

Actually the argument tripped over the first hurdle and then started playing with it's shoelaces.
 
So what were these people in the video reacting to if the video was fake?
 
kageki said:
How about a serious response because right now I'm laughing.
Click to expand...
The people in the videos where you see people in the videos were (bad) acting.
The sound track on video 3 (where you don't see anyone) is a collection of disparate clips where the people could have been reacting to anything from a fireworks display to the opening of a new pizza shop.
 
Stray Cat said:
The people in the videos where you see people in the videos were (bad) acting.
The sound track on video 3 (where you don't see anyone) is a collection of disparate clips where the people could have been reacting to anything from a fireworks display to the opening of a new pizza shop.
Click to expand...

People in the video? This one? Who is acting and how do you prove it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0lEqR1Oy3I&feature=player_embedded

Which one is video 3? Can you please link the videos because it's confusing.
 
Last edited:
Stray Cat said:
You prove it by showing that what they are reacting to is not really there.


Yes, maybe your confusion is ruling your mind. Read the thread and once it is no longer confusing... come back and we'll talk.
Click to expand...

Oh so now it's not acting?

It's not hard to link the video, but I guess you feel throwing out some random arguments constitutes "debunking".
 
Stray Cat said:
However you seem to think that one that was faked wasn't and one that wasn't was. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I've not stated my beliefs and that wasn't the point of the post. It was to show that a real fake video doesn't prove anything.
 
kageki said:
Oh so now it's not acting?
Click to expand...
A fake reaction to something not really there is acting.

kageki said:
It's not hard to link the video, but I guess you feel throwing out some random arguments constitutes "debunking".
Click to expand...
The links to the various videos are in the thread along with sometimes quite detailed deconstructions of them. If you want to discuss the issue, it would be nice if you were up to speed with the details.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom