Then your honest and true belief is simply nonsense.
No comment on remote-activated, fire-resistant bolt-cutting mechanism hidden in the H-beams? Come on, Major Tom finally shared his fantasy; what's yours?
As I've said repeatedly on that thread, I don't think it was a great idea to include MIHOP details in the conclusion (though I do understand why they have been, and the scope intended), and similarly I don't think the posts you reference do MT any favours given the hostile climate and penchant for misinterpretation that can occur here.
MT has stated a small-implementation-scale MIHOP theory. Does he think that is what happened ? No idea. Ask him. Is he stating that's what happened ? No.
The evidence in this context is, of course, the video record.
Irrelevant ? No. Widely misunderstood, absolutely, as recent discussions are total testament to.
Nonsense.
Nonsense.
Irrelevant.
Paranoid delusion.
I asked this before, and apologize for not digging through the thread to find it, because my recollection is that you didn't address it. Again, apologies if I'm wrong.femr2 said:
Eh ? Not sure I understand your point.
(I'm sure there are folk who would choose to argue pedantic semantics on the choice of words, but meh...irrelevant)
Since femr2 and the truthers are the only ones endowed with X-ray vision (that apparently works on captured images!) that allows them to see what is happening through the debris cloud (or is that "Pyroclastic Flow"?), we have to take his word for it...
Not at all. I've pointed you at the video record. That's the point, words are always subjective.
...which though assuredly quite embarrasing for him, is his way of indicating he doesn't believe that the perimeter could remain upright at all after the crush front has advanced.Do you know what the tensile strength of a 3/4" mild steel bolt is? You had about 120 of them stretched across each floor, tying the exterior columns to the cables tied to the trusses. They failed in tension.
Do you know what the shear strength of same sized bolt is? You had about 60 of those tying each truss to its truss seat. Those failed in shear.
Tell me again how a 200' wide by 6 story tall wall of free standing 14" x 14" x 1/4" thick box columns are going to continue standing serenely while one entire floor's worth of those bolts are all jerked, from one side, to failure.
When they are famously "pulling" a free-standing wall of a building to failure with cables, do you think that they need to use that many bolts?
___
Ever seen a bulldozer plow its way thru a rocky field? That is, in essence, what the upper block is doing to the lower block.
Ever notice how the material being plowed does not form a perfectly straight line, equal in width to the bulldozer's blade? But rather builds up on each side of the blade & is shoved sideways as the dozer cuts a swath.
You're claiming that the upper block, plowing its way thru the lower structure, created a front end that matched perfectly the inside dimensions of the peripheral wall???
And magically sheared all the internal floors perfectly from outer columns ??
And left a massively unstable external wall standing in place???
And it wasn't until the crush front had long since passed by, with the high pressure front IN ADVANCE of it, that the outer walls suddenly threw themselves in all direction??
Or perhaps it was late-firing nanothermite that threw the external columns hundreds of feet …?
Low res video...
You don't see the corner remnant sticking up ?
)You know, there are rules here about posting the same image over and over again.
Do you mean like these...
tfk said:
...within which you are talking about the WEST face, showing a view of the north and east faces of WTC2, when your response, pointed at MT was about WTC1 ?tfk said:
