femr,
Your replies have been a sad, pathetic joke for some time now. No reason to expect anything different now.
Another whole "waste of bandwidth", providing no answer.
The reason is obvious: You have no answer. And these pathetic offerings are the best you can do.
Why don't you put all this down, go out & get a job & try to contribute to society in some fashion. Instead of sitting on a bunch of twoofer blog sites 24/7?
No, I asked you...
"Surely you already know the answers to these questions ?"
you replied...
"Yup."
No, femr, I said:
Yup.
Didn't expect an answer.
Never mind. I ain't got the time for your juvenile games.
Quote mining tools: sharp & at the ready.
Reading comprehension: Inoperative. No repair expected.
… cannot therefore have a clue about any of the basis of the ROOSD study …
… in the ROOSD thread ...
… How embarrasing.
Not embarrassing in the slightest.
There is a large & steaming pile of crackpot theories, offered up by a bunch of incompetent fools, that I don't keep up with.
I could not possibly tell you the latest developments in:
Bermuda Triangle
JFK assassination conspiracy
Alien Abductions
etc. etc. etc.
It's a long & undistinguished line up.
Get at the end.
Your ROOSD is simple a late bit of claptrap, constructed by a bunch of fools.
And it's not worth my time.
Neither are the authors. As evidenced by your answers here.
Way to focus on the inconsequential.
"The dark, gaseous "smoky-looking" stuff that is not smoke, but rather debris-laden air."
I've asked 3 times now if that one page that I cited over at the 911 forum is the "ROOSD study". No answer.
I've asked 3 times now who are the authors of that study: no answer.
I've asked 3 times now if the replies below it are the authors' concept of a "peer review": no answer.
The crush fronts traverse inside the perimeter, leaving the perimeter destruction trilaing far behind.
THAT'S your "ROOSD" story??
Sure thing.
Do you know what the tensile strength of a 3/4" mild steel bolt is? You had about 120 of them stretched across each floor, tying the exterior columns to the cables tied to the trusses. They failed in tension.
Do you know what the shear strength of same sized bolt is? You had about 60 of those tying each truss to its truss seat. Those failed in shear.
Tell me again how a 200' wide by 6 story tall wall of free standing 14" x 14" x 1/4" thick box columns are going to continue standing serenely while one entire floor's worth of those bolts are all jerked, from one side, to failure.
When they are famously "pulling" a free-standing wall of a building to failure with cables, do you think that they need to use that many bolts?
___
Ever seen a bulldozer plow its way thru a rocky field? That is, in essence, what the upper block is doing to the lower block.
Ever notice how the material being plowed does not form a perfectly straight line, equal in width to the bulldozer's blade? But rather builds up on each side of the blade & is shoved sideways as the dozer cuts a swath.
You're claiming that the upper block, plowing its way thru the lower structure, created a front end that matched perfectly the inside dimensions of the peripheral wall???
And magically sheared all the internal floors perfectly from outer columns ??
And left a massively unstable external wall standing in place???
And it wasn't until the crush front had long since passed by, with the high pressure front IN ADVANCE of it, that the outer walls suddenly threw themselves in all direction??
Or perhaps it was late-firing nanothermite that threw the external columns hundreds of feet …?
THAT's your "ROOSD theory" …?
___
I'll ask again… what evidence do you have that proves to you that the ejected material that you note is the crush front & not the result of the completely expected and KNOWN high pressure wave that precedes the crush front.
From all the dancing, "nothing" seems to be the correct answer.
