1.) Didn't God's latest messenger tell us that sacrifices were useless and or unnecessary?
Which messenger? Jesus? Muhammad? Ashtar Sheran? The Heaven's Gate guru? Some contactee?
And he/she/it was a messenger from "God" or "god"? And which "God" or "god"?
2.) I disagree with your livestock analogy. But I DO believe the stories of abduction are just about identical to how we treat endangered species. That said, while it looks and sounds bad as we poke, probe and prod our animal brethren , our scientists are merely trying to preserve the species.
Well, the way I see it, its just like vets treating livestock or animals at a game farm. By the way, some game farms do a great job in preserving species and the environment. Can you prove my interpretation of Earth as a farm or game farm of humans is wrong? Can you show why yours is better?
Please note that "because it fits my views" is not good enough.
3.) To be annually shaved for their wool?
How naive...
Ever ate lamb's ribs?
4.) Ignore what doesn't fit your equation, great, how convenient.
Oh, sure! I bet its very convenient for you to ignore the many UFO reports where the UFOnauts themselves state that they came from other planets...
Kinda like you are doing at the quote below:
First, please stop using the word "alien" or "interstellar", in or with references to my threads. I find it is an undo demand that skeptics place on U.F.O.'s, by moving them into the metaphysical. If we allow for them to have 'always' been up there, then they need be only slightly more capable than us. Maybe they've only mastered inter-orbital flight...
Or you actually want us to follow your interpretation, your cherry-picking of UFO lore, tailored to your "equation" instead what you stated at the OP?
I have already shown other things you ignored... But if you follow that lead, you might find a path which will ultimately bring you to an answer to the question I made- Why my space opera (as well as many others) could be built from UFO lore and be at last as good as many others?
I think you make an error when you ascribe past behavior to current motives, as if they are exactly what they were yesterday. To ascribe Hitler's "Final Solution" to today's Germany would be wrong.
A bit of a a Godwin here, eh?
Living things, grow, change, and evolve. Why should we not expect 'them' to do the same?
There are way too much conceptual errors with what you wrote. Let me cite just a few:
Why would our current moral standards apply to an alien species? What makes is so special, so unique, so universal?
The ethic code "they" have for themselves may be different from the one "they" have for us. Why would "they" care about their livestock more than we do about ours? I am very polite, peacefull and ethical in respect to my good fellow humans, but I still enjoy eating lambs' ribs, for example. Many pleasant, friendly and peacefull people enjoy hunting.
"Gods" are always (or almost always) painted as eternal or almost eternal. So, the current shepperds may be the same which were around say, 4ky ago or even more. Not too many chances for a change in this case, eh?
Godwins apart, have we as whole actually improved as species regarding ethics and morale? Have you noticed that genocides and mass murders have not stopped since WWII? Humanity has been commiting brutal crimes since it appeared on Earth.
So, how would you like to be served when the skydemons descend?