As I said before, you no longer even attempt to hide your dishonesty, do you?
In fact, the same wiki entry says that most of those same scholars say the nativity didn't happen and that details about the resurrection didn't happen, i.e., the miraculous details.
It also says that the agreement on the mundane details is largely a result of a reconstruction of what life would be like; it is not a result of actually finding evidence that your Jesus existed.
Life from non-life is abiogenesis. God creating Adam from dust is abiogenesis.
It is only the mechanism on which we disagree.
Whether you say it or not, DOC, you believe in abiogenesis.
And nice dodge of the pertinent parts of the post. You are at least consistent in that regard.
Yup. Which goes exactly to the point of my post which you excised in your quotation. Even ignoring the moving goalposts (the majority of scholars who study early Christianity, i.e., Christian scholars, as opposed to the majority of historians), the wiki entry says they agree on the mundane aspects of a person called Jesus' life. There is no agreement on divinity.From Wiki on the historicity of Jesus:
...The majority of scholars who study early Christianity believe that the Gospels do contain some reliable information about Jesus,[7][8][9] agreeing that Jesus was a Jew who was regarded as a teacher and healer, that he was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified in Jerusalem on the orders of the Roman Prefect of Judaea, Pontius Pilate, on the charge of sedition against the Roman Empire...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
In fact, the same wiki entry says that most of those same scholars say the nativity didn't happen and that details about the resurrection didn't happen, i.e., the miraculous details.
It also says that the agreement on the mundane details is largely a result of a reconstruction of what life would be like; it is not a result of actually finding evidence that your Jesus existed.
That's the point. You believe it but can't say the words.I believe if a living God did not will life to be created it never would have been created. If I said what you said I believe which post did it come from. There is no such post.
Life from non-life is abiogenesis. God creating Adam from dust is abiogenesis.
It is only the mechanism on which we disagree.
Whether you say it or not, DOC, you believe in abiogenesis.
And nice dodge of the pertinent parts of the post. You are at least consistent in that regard.