WTC7 and the NIST free fall failure

[beachnut]

...
What do you think about "Publish or perish"?

You don't know what it means. That explains ... that is funny (may be a clue why you may not be publishing anything on 911 past the internet)

... "Publish or perish"

..and a little bit of good old fascism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish_or_perish

"Publish or perish" refers to the pressure to publish work constantly to further or sustain a career in academia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish_or_perish

You never worked in academia, you never worked with PhDs on papers which were published; this is why you have no clue what "publish or perish" means. Try google next time; google coupled with good judgment.

I forgot ... 911 truth does not do simile or things like this.

 

[achimspok]

What's so interesting about my position, which was that i don't believe you and won't present your case for you to NIST? Why are you throwing another tantrum over that?

I didn't ask you to read anything or trust me about anything. I'm just wondering why you don't really trust yourself and what your claiming enough to put it to the test by facing off with those you claim are so wrong.

Go give some sponge bob pix and use that juvenile arrogant act with NIST and their experts... That helps your credibility, I'm sure that'll work well for you... You talk alot of talk, but sure are afraid to walk the walk, which is common for people that are full of it...

Nice spoken.
I'm not afraid of anything.
I trust my results. I have no problem about that.
What's your problem?

Read page one! That's all I asked for. I would help you to argue somehow on topic. No one is indeed interested in your believes about my personality.
May be you should start a thread in some medicine and psychology sub-forum.

 

[achimspok]

You don't know what it means. That explains ... that is funny

perish
■ verb
literary die, especially in a violent or sudden way.
▶suffer complete ruin or destruction.
(of rubber, food, etc.) rot or decay.

 

[uke2se]

Nice spoken.
I'm not afraid of anything.
I trust my results. I have no problem about that.

Then why won't your bring them to someone who matters? Why won't you attempt to get them published in an engineering journal or take them up with some of those hundreds of thousands of experts who have no problem with NIST's report and see nothing suspicious in the collapse of WTC 7? Why won't you attempt to get the Truth^TM out? Surely it's your duty as a human being to break this thing wide open? Why do you insist on arguing with the people of this forum who can't do anything about it even if they did believe you (which they don't)?

 

[uke2se]

perish
■ verb
literary die, especially in a violent or sudden way.
▶suffer complete ruin or destruction.
(of rubber, food, etc.) rot or decay.

You could have just said that you didn't understand what the phrase meant. You didn't have to demonstrate it.

 

[achimspok]

You could have just said that you didn't understand what the phrase meant. You didn't have to demonstrate it.

Let's say, if someone recommend me to die in a sudden and violent way then I wont ask: Is it something nice you said to your colleagues in school or do you want me really to die?

Part One - you are right.
I never thought it would be such a big thing as it now seems to be.
I really should publish it but I wouldn't perish if I don't. You know what I mean.
It's just a question of 2 or 3 days off for a nice form.
Why the hell did I present my results to people who can't do anything about it?

Btw, what could they do about it if they could other than knowing about it?
That was my request "Let them know about it".
I didn't expected that anyone do something about it.

Hey guys, you don't need to do anything!
Does it feel better?

 

[achimspok]

... this is why you have no clue what "publish or perish" means.

Besides your analysis, no one in Germany says "publish or perish" so far as I know. Try to google for "Friß oder Stirb"!

 

[twinstead]

"publish or perish" is really the only thing one can say in this situation, where one with an extreme minority view arrogantly proclaims that he is right and the majority is wrong. I'm sure in Germany they have some idiom that means the same thing.

I suspect, achimspok, that a debate with one of the NIST contributors will wipe that little smirk right off your face.

 

[achimspok]

"publish or perish" is really the only thing one can say in this situation, where one with an extreme minority view arrogantly proclaims that he is right and the majority is wrong.

I suspect, achimspok, that a debate with one of the NIST contributors will wipe that little smirk right off your face.

He laughs best that laughs last.

 

[achimspok]

"publish or perish" is really the only thing one can say in this situation, where one with an extreme minority view arrogantly proclaims that he is right and the majority is wrong.

Oh btw, I did not "proclaim" that I am right and the majority is wrong.
I presented some - I would say - evidence for my point of view and asked the majority for any opinion about that topic.
All I got was some patronizing analysis about my personality and "Why would I commit such a sacrilege". That's it.

You know, I was frequently around and ALWAYS I read comments about years and years of professional expertise and so on. How could I know that I would get only some hot air instead of a dozen experts who show me exactly my mistakes in
- the method
- the calculation
- the perspective issue
- the movement of the parapet ...

SMIRK

 

[dafydd]

Then why won't your bring them to someone who matters? Why won't you attempt to get them published in an engineering journal or take them up with some of those hundreds of thousands of experts who have no problem with NIST's report and see nothing suspicious in the collapse of WTC 7? Why won't you attempt to get the Truth^TM out? Surely it's your duty as a human being to break this thing wide open? Why do you insist on arguing with the people of this forum who can't do anything about it even if they did believe you (which they don't)?[/QUOTE

I would love to be a fly on the wall when his work is read by real engineers.

 

[dafydd]

Oh btw, I did not "proclaim" that I am right and the majority is wrong.
I presented some - I would say - evidence for my point of view and asked the majority for any opinion about that topic.
All I got was some patronizing analysis about my personality and "Why would I commit such a sacrilege". That's it.

You know, I was frequently around and ALWAYS I read comments about years and years of professional expertise and so on. How could I know that I would get only some hot air instead of a dozen experts who show me exactly my mistakes in
- the method
- the calculation
- the perspective issue
- the movement of the parapet ...


SMIRK

So you admit to the mistakes? That's a start.

 

[The Platypus]

Nice spoken.
I'm not afraid of anything.
I trust my results. I have no problem about that.
What's your problem?

Read page one! That's all I asked for. I would help you to argue somehow on topic. No one is indeed interested in your believes about my personality.
May be you should start a thread in some medicine and psychology sub-forum.

If you trust and your not afraid then what's stopping you from doing something more than ranting like your crazy on an internet forum to people that have nothing to do with it?

 

[achimspok]

Then why won't your bring them to someone who matters? Why won't you attempt to get them published in an engineering journal or take them up with some of those hundreds of thousands of experts who have no problem with NIST's report and see nothing suspicious in the collapse of WTC 7? Why won't you attempt to get the Truth^TM out? Surely it's your duty as a human being to break this thing wide open? Why do you insist on arguing with the people of this forum who can't do anything about it even if they did believe you (which they don't)?[/QUOTE

I would love to be a fly on the wall when his work is read by real engineers.

Me too.

 

[achimspok]

So you admit to the mistakes? That's a start.

If you show me one than I will check it.
If you are right I will admit it.
That's the rule.

 

[achimspok]

If you trust and your not afraid then what's stopping you from doing something more than ranting like your crazy on an internet forum to people that have nothing to do with it?

Everyone here has to do with it because
1) he had chosen to read this topic for whatever reason.
2) he commented on it otherwise I wouldn't know he's around

Easy enough?

You can choose to leave and you have nothing to do with it anymore.

 

[uke2se]

Let's say, if someone recommend me to die in a sudden and violent way then I wont ask: Is it something nice you said to your colleagues in school or do you want me really to die?

Who "recommended you to die"?

Part One - you are right.
I never thought it would be such a big thing as it now seems to be.
I really should publish it but I wouldn't perish if I don't. You know what I mean.
It's just a question of 2 or 3 days off for a nice form.
Why the hell did I present my results to people who can't do anything about it?

Btw, what could they do about it if they could other than knowing about it?
That was my request "Let them know about it".
I didn't expected that anyone do something about it.

Hey guys, you don't need to do anything!
Does it feel better?

I really don't understand what you are talking about. Could we try this again?

If you have such a strong faith in your "measurements" as you say you do, why haven't you taken them to someone who could do something about it? Why haven't you gotten them published for the world to see? The mere fact that you come to an obscure internet forum and get all blustered when nobody believes you suggests that you really have no faith in your measurements but are looking for some kind of e-fame.

This is something that we are quite used to here at JREF. Many twoofers come here with what they consider the Proof to end all Proofs for a conspiracy on 9/11. On closer scrutiny, none of their claims hold up, and they immediately get defensive when scrutinized. I think it's an ego thing. You could prove me wrong by taking your "arguments" from this forum and to the engineering community.

 

[beachnut]

Besides your analysis, no one in Germany says "publish or perish" so far as I know. Try to google for "Friß oder Stirb"!

No wonder you don't understand "Veröffentlichen oder untergehen" ...

Only 2900 plus entries for the correct phrase. Your analysis of this topic is like your OP, nonsense backed by nothing.

 

[The Platypus]

If you show me one than I will check it.
If you are right I will admit it.
That's the rule.

Funny this guy makes that rule for himself, yet expects us to believe him about NIST mistakes, without showing NIST and letting them check it to see if he is right...LMAO

Wow...

 

[uke2se]

Everyone here has to do with it because
1) he had chosen to read this topic for whatever reason.
2) he commented on it otherwise I wouldn't know he's around

Easy enough?

You can choose to leave and you have nothing to do with it anymore.

You're not getting it. It's not that we don't enjoy having twoofers like you around for a laugh. What we don't understand is that if you believe you have such strong evidence, why don't you do something productive with it rather than post on an obscure internet forum. It really casts serious doubts on your evidence for you to take the action you have chosen.