We're told that the building fell to the south, yet we see debris damage to the north. The rubble pile, however, is centered over its foundation, therefore while mass dispersed, the collapse was still down into its own footprint.
The o/p asks "Did building 7 crash into other buildings as it fell?"
The answer is clearly YES.
Why are we discussing how much of the building fell into the original footprint?
Because truthers, for some reason the no one, least of all the truthers, can explain, think that "falling into its own footprint" is evidence of controlled demolition.
Was there any doubt that he is/was a kid?Wow, I never guessed he was talking about kids sneakers!![]()
Building Footprint. Deal with it.
http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&...footprint&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Building Footprint. Deal with it.
http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&...footprint&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
So what does the phrase "to bring a building down into its footprint" mean to you? Where does the debris go?
Means within its own building foot print. Not most of.. All ofSo what does the phrase "to bring a building down into its footprint" mean to you? Where does the debris go?
The question was posed to A W Smith.
So what does the phrase "to bring a building down into its footprint" mean to you? Where does the debris go?
I've never said anything other than that it fell into its own footprint. Which your picture clearly shows. I'm glad you agree.

well ergo? Nothing to say?
While we're all listening to crickets, take a look at the video I posted and you will see why ergo fled,