The 100% Impossible 9/11 Inside Job

[Sword_Of_Truth]

NO I didn't hear the huge explosion in the video but the reporter DID.
Meaning the explosion noises in the video were excised or muted.
These firemen heard the explosions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o&feature=player_embedded


Are you calling these firemen liars AW ?
Be honest with us AW - Are you saying the reporter shouted
"HUGE EXPLOSION" just to fool those stupid twoofers he knew
would question the official story in the future ?

Some have something to say,
and some have to say something .

it's funny how 9/11 twoofers ignore this every time it's pointed out, which means I probably shouldn't waste my time, but what the hell...

SECONDARY EXPLOSIONS ARE A COMMON FEATURE OF MAJOR BUILDING FIRES. THINGS EXPLODE INSIDE BURNING BUILDINGS.

Is this getting through to any of you idiots, or do we need to engage in further text formatting abuse?

 

[WildCat]

Are you calling these firemen liars AW ?
Be honest with us AW - Are you saying the reporter shouted
"HUGE EXPLOSION" just to fool those stupid twoofers he knew
would question the official story in the future ?

Are these firemen truthers? Do they think there were bombs? Thermite?

If not, why not?

 

[alienentity]

POopsie

AlienEntity's integrity and veracity has been benchmarked in this post:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6702140#post6702140
Reporter :HUGE EXPLOSION !

BTW likewise AW Smith's reply typifies and benchmarks the JREF debunkie monkey crew's "on message" mantra ...NO ?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6702155#post6702155

LOL, so the reporter calls it an explosion, while we are listening to a rumble. OKedokey. How's about Freight Trains on 9/11? By your standards, there were real trains thundering down:

'Nicholas Borrillo -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) on 23rd floor of North Tower:
Then we heard a rumble. We heard it and we felt the whole building shake. It was like being on a train, being in an earthquake. A train is more like it, because with the train you hear the rumbling, and it kind of like moved you around in the hall.

Paul Curran -- Fire Patrolman (F.D.N.Y.) North Tower:
I went back and stood right in front of Eight World Trade Center right by the customs house, and the north tower was set right next to it. Not that much time went by, and all of a sudden the ground just started shaking. It felt like a train was running under my feet.

Joseph Fortis -- E.M.T. (E.M.S.) T]he ground started shaking like a train was coming. You looked up, and I guess -- I don't know, it was one that came down first or two? Which one?

Keith Murphy -- (F.D.N.Y.) [Engine 47] At the time, I would have said they sounded like bombs, but it was boom boom boom and then the lights all go out. I hear someone say oh, s___, that was just for the lights out. I would say about 3, 4 seconds, all of a sudden this tremendous roar. It sounded like being in a tunnel with the train coming at you.

Timothy Julian -- Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.) [Ladder 118] You know, and I just heard like an explosion and then cracking type of noise, and then it sounded like a freight train, rumbling and picking up speed, and I remember I looked up, and I saw it coming down.'

Thanks for reminding us, Fonebone, that people's descriptive words MUST be interpreted literally, and that actual audio evidence is irrelevant.

 

[alienentity]

ps Fonebone, the term 'explosion' is not itself entirely precise. You are inferring something from the reporter's words, but without verifying what he actually meant.

One valid (and common) use of the word 'explosion' is 'a loud noise'. By no means does the word mean 'high explosive' or even indicate the presence of high explosives of any kind.

But you're grasping at straws, so this will have little meaning to you. You don't want to consider anything outside your narrow agenda. We understand.

So it's big ole bombs and freight trains on 9/11 alright. That's what they said, so that's what it was. LOL

 

[alienentity]

One minute into this video, a nanothermite bomb goes off inside the camaro's tire.

The tire exploded, ergo there were high explosive devices triggered by the NWO, right?

Got it. I get the truther thing now. They're everywhere, the bombs.... be very afraid!!



Note: the car was damaged by the explosion, it's rear window shattered. That's how powerful a high-explosive nanothermite tire-bomb is!

 

[tempesta29]

it's funny how 9/11 twoofers ignore this every time it's pointed out, which means I probably shouldn't waste my time, but what the hell...

Is this getting through to any of you idiots, or do we need to engage in further text formatting abuse?

It's a straw man; that's it's problem. The argument that explosions can occur in office fires isn't being disputed, at least not by me. However the explosions experienced on 9/11 are not consistent with the ones you're describing.

People were knocked off their feet by explosions felt at the Twin Towers. The types of explosions felt by eyewitnesses were literally ground shaking. People felt them throughout the structure and overwhelmingly emanating from deep in the sub-levels. Why would anything be exploding in the basement levels after a plane crash far closer to the roof?

So let's get an understanding on what is being disputed here, or you can continue with your insightful large red font tirade.

 

[alienentity]

Yup, they are. You're wrong again. Several hundred thousand tons of collapsing building have enormous force. Just the air expulsion alone caused firemen to fly several stories down stairwells.

The ground shook, as if an earthquake was happening (apparently you don't read very well, as that was described by eyewitnesses).
Controlled demolitions don't do that. They just don't. Ever.

And you keep using the word 'explosion' as if it is a 'proof' of high explosives. You're again mistaken. It just means you are afraid to venture outside the comforting cocoon of your beliefs and look at semantics and figurative speech.

Remember, if explosions = high explosives, then 'freight trains' = real freight trains.

you just can't have it both ways. You really can't.

 

[alienentity]

What happened to WTC 7 when it was clobbered by parts of the collapsing North Tower?

Wow, it felt like an earthquake, that's what michael hess described it as. It lasted about 10 seconds, he says.

hmm, rumble, earth trembling. Just like a 1300 ft building collapsing. How 'bout that?

 

[tempesta29]

Yup, they are. You're wrong again. Several hundred thousand tons of collapsing building have enormous force. Just the air expulsion alone caused firemen to fly several stories down stairwells.

These are explosions prior to collapse. Please pay attention and we can avoid these unproductive asides.

 

[tempesta29]

What happened to WTC 7 when it was clobbered by parts of the collapsing North Tower?

Wow, it felt like an earthquake, that's what michael hess described it as. It lasted about 10 seconds, he says.

hmm, rumble, earth trembling. Just like a 1300 ft building collapsing. How 'bout that?

What on Earth are you talking about. Eyewitnesses described massive explosions that literally rocked the base structure of the Twin Towers, explosions completely separate from a) the planes striking or b) any collapsing structure.

Please stop convoluting the facts to your own gain.

 

[TJM]

What on Earth are you talking about. Eyewitnesses described massive explosions that literally rocked the base structure of the Twin Towers, explosions completely separate from a) the planes striking or b) any collapsing structure.

Please stop convoluting the facts to your own gain.

Yes, well, your eyewitnesses seem to have been quotemined from various youtube videos that are remarkable for their lack of explosions.

 

[tempesta29]

Yes, well, your eyewitnesses seem to have been quotemined from various youtube videos that are remarkable for their lack of explosions.

You're right: they most certainly should have been interviewed by news crews during the explosions. It's the general apathy of these entry-level journalists which is to blame.

Really, I applaud the general strategy you've got however. Throwing words like "youtube" and "quotemine" certainly makes for a compelling argument. Then your totally logical implication that videos of eyewitness accounts should contain explosions just sends it over the top. I'd say it's another home run for you sir.

 

[TJM]

You're right: they most certainly should have been interviewed by news crews during the explosions. It's the general apathy of these entry-level journalists which is to blame.

Really, I applaud the general strategy you've got however. Throwing words like "youtube" and "quotemine" certainly makes for a compelling argument. Then your totally logical implication that videos of eyewitness accounts should contain explosions just sends it over the top. I'd say it's another home run for you sir.

Yet the fact remains, no explosions caught on video or audio, though the World Trade Center collapses were recorded by multiple sources.

 

[GlennB]

This is one of the "ground zero meteorites". It's comprised of formerly molten steel and concrete.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc_meteorite.wmv

No it isn't. It's comprised of compressed concrete, floor assembly, rebar and office contents. It has pieces of paper embedded in it, some with still-legible writing. There is no amorphous re-solidified steel.

 

[tempesta29]

Yet the fact remains, no explosions caught on video or audio, though the World Trade Center collapses were recorded by multiple sources.

Nice dodge/change of subject. When you fail do you just like moving on to the next irrelevant point?

 

[TJM]

Nice dodge/change of subject. When you fail do you just like moving on to the next irrelevant point?

No explosions recorded by multiple sources. It's on topic.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

This is one of the "ground zero meteorites". It's comprised of formerly molten steel and concrete.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc_meteorite.wmv

There's a 9/11 display here in NYC that houses some of these "meteorites".
http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/gun_notice.jpg

Color me suprised. Tempest reads whatreallyhappened.com.

Looks like we have another Hitler-lover, here.

 

[ozeco41]

Color me suprised. Tempest reads whatreallyhappened.com.

Looks like we have another Hitler-lover, here.

Does he actually read what he posts?

Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path.

 

[alienentity]

What on Earth are you talking about. Eyewitnesses described massive explosions that literally rocked the base structure of the Twin Towers, explosions completely separate from a) the planes striking or b) any collapsing structure.

Please stop convoluting the facts to your own gain.

OK, quantify, in your own words, what 500,000 tons of collapsing building should feel like when it's raining down all around you.

If you're referring to the explosions in the tower basements, accompanied immediately by the smell of jet fuel...gee, I wonder if it was just a coincidence that jets had dumped massive loads of flammable liquid there.

Yah, gotta be a coincidence, for sure. Uh huh. No correlation. Nuh uh.

Elevator crashes from somewhere high up, nah, that wouldn't go bang or make any noise. Of course not.

It was all nanothermite. WE get it, dude. Wake up people!!!! Inside job!!!!

 

[alienentity]

These are explosions prior to collapse. Please pay attention and we can avoid these unproductive asides.

You mean the ones which blasted out of the elevator shafts and burned people to a crisp, smelling of jet fuel?

[truther mode]Yeah, high explosives fer sure. Not jet fuel. Oh no, where would jet fuel have possibly come from? There was no jet fuel in the buildings, no way man! [/truther mode]

Neither cruise missiles nor holographic jets carry fuel, so maybe that's why this whole jet-fuel-confusion thing came about. Some silly people (snicker) still think that jets full of innocent people crashed into the towers. What a hoax, eh?