• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Theory links Newtonian/Quantum the amazing Frank Znidarsic

QM explains both the quantisation of energy levels and the absence of radiation due to the orbital motion of the electron,

So does this theory. There is no radiation due to 100% energy tranfers due to impedance matching
 
So the question now is, if it's not the lack of electron density at the nucleus that stops s electrons crashing into the nucleus, what does?

This is why the electron has to transition from parent state to daughter state through the transitional (collapsed) subset of the wavefunction. There is no collapsed transitional wavefunction smaller than ground state transitional orbital (rc for the hydrogen atom), because that is the smallest multiple that it can be; only positive integers are allowed for the factor of n. Because there is no transitional state for it to transition to from the ground state, in essence; there is no daughter state for it to transition into during it's transitional (collapsed) wavefunction progression. This essentially locks the electron into the ground state orbital (it can only jump higher, not lower)
 
Dude, I read through Znidarsic's paper, and I found it to be... crap, essentially. Linking to more crappy powerpoints and Youtube videos that contain the same errors and bad arguments isn't going to convince us of anything, except maybe that the crap pile is bigger than we thought.

What you have to do is actually address the criticisms brought up here by those knowledgeable in physics, as opposed to ignoring the criticisms and acting like a broken record :rolleyes:

The davis paper explain better with maths any mathematicians able to look at the math in the paper
here
 
Lack of a discrete electron.

If your electron is a nebulous cloud of probability rather than a discrete classical particle, what would it even mean for the electron to crash into the nucleus?
Nothing. Or at least the wave-function penetrates the nuclear interior. "You" can actually use this to measure some nuclear properties. Roughly, the wavefunction and corresponding atomic energy level will differ between a point nucleus approximation and one with a finite size that you measure (think Gauss' law). You can then use that difference to work out (with a lot of maths) the charge radius of the nucleus in question.
Not to mention, you have to recall that in this view we're looking at the electron in terms of a wavefunction, and it is a fundamental property of waves that when they interact they pass through each other and they are non-localized. Perhaps not the best way to think about it, but certainly better than thinking of the electron as a billiard ball (at least in this case).

ETA: What Tubbythin said :)

Thanks guys, this makes a lot of sense.

This is why the electron has to transition from parent state to daughter state through the transitional (collapsed) subset of the wavefunction. There is no collapsed transitional wavefunction smaller than ground state transitional orbital (rc for the hydrogen atom), because that is the smallest multiple that it can be; only positive integers are allowed for the factor of n. Because there is no transitional state for it to transition to from the ground state, in essence; there is no daughter state for it to transition into during it's transitional (collapsed) wavefunction progression. This essentially locks the electron into the ground state orbital (it can only jump higher, not lower)

This is just the same snippet of the Davis paper you posted earlier. Except this time it's rehashed to make even less sense. I wasn't sure that was possible, but somehow you managed it. Well done!
 
Thanks guys, this makes a lot of sense.

This is just the same snippet of the Davis paper you posted earlier. Except this time it's rehashed to make even less sense. I wasn't sure that was possible, but somehow you managed it. Well done!

well this is why not the complicated stuff you claim "makes sense" Would you have me believe if everyone wasn't looking at the moon it would collapse into a wavefunction? and can you at least admit you were wrong about the radius of a proton at least the FULL radius
 
Last edited:
JCM, if cold fusion has been done and has been "replicated around the world", then why isn't this crank powering his house with it? His car? Why isn't he the richest person on the planet, yet?
 
JCM, if cold fusion has been done and has been "replicated around the world", then why isn't this crank powering his house with it? His car? Why isn't he the richest person on the planet, yet?
I didnt say uniformly replicated nor standardized prototyped and made commercially viable did I?
You are building strawmen the two do not relate at all. He is not the emperor of an empiracle controlling cold fusion. he hasnt discovered everything. he cant pay for his own lab, materials, prototypes and whatnot. Anyone say it was easy to do this? How dare you label him a crank
 
Last edited:
You are building strawmen the two do not relate at all

I respectfully disagree. It was a valid question. Please answer it. If this guy has actually successfully created cold fusion, and if it's been successfully duplicated around the world, why is his house still on the power grid? Why is he not the richest person on the planet? Why hasn't every nuclear, coal, and natural gas power plant in the world been shut down or reconfigured to use cold fusion? Why is it not all over the news?

Please answer.
 
The davis paper explain better with maths any mathematicians able to look at the math in the paper
here

That paper contains the same damn arguments that have already been presented here and addressed - repeatedly!

Broken record is broken :rolleyes:
 
If this guy has actually successfully created cold fusion, and if it's been successfully duplicated around the world, why is his house still on the power grid? Why is he not the richest person on the planet? Why hasn't every nuclear, coal, and natural gas power plant in the world been shut down or reconfigured to use cold fusion? Why is it not all over the news?
the news does what it will. You are drawing parallells between non related things please clairifiy how doing a cold fusion experiment would somehow cause him to become the richest person on the planet instantaneously? And his house to magically go off the grid instantaneously. Or even every nuclear, coal, and natural gas power plant in the world been shut down or reconfigured to use cold fusion in an instant. there are many steps between what you purport will happen as a matter of cause from cold fusion success and it is factious of you to be so ignorant.
 
but really its 1.36fm
references for the 1.36fm

Nope, that's the average spacing between nucleons in large nuclei. It is not the radius of the proton or neutron, which (as has been said) ~0.8 fm.
 
I respectfully disagree. It was a valid question. Please answer it. If this guy has actually successfully created cold fusion, and if it's been successfully duplicated around the world, why is his house still on the power grid? Why is he not the richest person on the planet? Why hasn't every nuclear, coal, and natural gas power plant in the world been shut down or reconfigured to use cold fusion? Why is it not all over the news?

Please answer.

According to this link there is a resurgence in the cold fusion story.
Make of what you will.;)

http://www.physorg.com/news188377829.html
 
According to this link there is a resurgence in the cold fusion story.
Make of what you will.;)

http://www.physorg.com/news188377829.html
If the priests mention it in the chapel then you must seriously look at it. The dogma is mind boggling think for yourselves only now that phyorg says well maybe there is something to this do you take a look. what about all the time before your priests said this might be possible
But thanks for the link for those that do need clergy it give some credence to the idea of it being at least possible, the first of many hurdles
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom