December Stundie Nominations

What ? Get into a semantics debate with a CT? Who are you and why do you want me to go insane?:rolleyes::D



I'm the guy who needs material for my comics, of course. And while we're on the subject:


Simple enough---the technology required to send man to ANY PLANET


...have you mentioned that Earth is a planet? :D
 
My favourite paranoid CTer at the Blackvault writes:

http://www.theblackvault.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=5107&p=71786#p71786

Has anyone ever been to another "planet"?
However the purity of the paranoia is what makes the post so juicy for me, particularily because I believe that Cole has me, among others, in mind as one who guides unsuspecting persons in to the abyss of nutterdome.

Thread topic is 'breaking' :rolleyes: news about NASA erroneously losing/erasing videos of the first Lunar landing. The OP also qualifies as a Stundie.

He has successfully debunked Star Trek.
 
You probably do misunderstand.



Wrong. If you had looked at my full posts that Saggy wanted to stundy, including references, you would know that this is the entire point of my argument: The body contains more fuel than necessary to cook off water, and therefore, once you cooked of the water, there will be fuel left.



Exactly. Theoretically. In practice, as I already posted myself before Saggy came along, you'd probably need a little extra fuel to account for inefficencies, and that's why the indented quote above contains the word "mostly self-sustaining"



Wrong. There are economies of scale.



No. There will be no spontaneous combustion because you initially need external fuel to cook away the water. Again, that was the basic premise of my argument, and you managed to miss it. Human tissue is not easily set aflame without prior drying.




Slowly, again, for you: The body, being wet, doesn't burn by itself, as evaporating body water will keep temperatures too low to sustain a fire. So for the first body (or bodies), you need external fuel to cook away enough water. Once you have accomplished this, the body will continue burning on its own, and release more energy in the process than you put in externally to cook away the water. Now that you got your first body (or bodies) burning, you can use the heat of their fire to cook away the water of additional bodies, without adding any more (or at least much) additional external fuel. The process becomes (mostly) self-sustaining after you dried your first layer of bodies sufficiently to make them flammable.
Why is this? Because the fuels of the body (fat, dry organic tissues) release about 10 times as much energy by burning than you need to cook away (evaporate) the 40kg of water in an average body.



Could you please acknowledge that you got it now?

The Holocaust Deniers have been very busy this month......
 
This is my very first nomination, but since I've been captivated by the car crash that is The David Icke Forums, possibly not my last.


Currently, in the UK, there is an ongoing and high profile police investigation, into the disappearance and subsequent murder of a young woman from Bristol, Joanna Yeates. In speculating about this case on the Icke Forums, it is becoming clear that 'The Powers That Be' (or 'tptb' as they are affectionately known over there) may be behind the murder.

How was this conclusion reached, you ask?

Why, by the ruthless application of logic, as my nominee 'diamond dogs' states;
Also both 25..symbolic pic on 2 pillars
article13417650c964d230.jpg


That's right, this act can be put down as a top level TPTB conspiracy because a couple of speed limit signs on a bridge show the same number as the victim's age.
As a traffic engineer I've looked on in sympathy as my civil engineering brethren, structural engineers, have been put in the dock over 9/11, but now it seems our cover is blown too.
Yes, that's right, those innocent little signs you studiously ignore, (unless there's a traffic policeman about), you have completely misunderstood. They are in fact the age limit for that particular area, in a sort of Logan's Run stylee. That you've remained alive thus far is purely luck. We'd have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those modern-day Sherlocks.

BTW, for the Doubting Thomases amongst you, further corroboration is given by ach76 with;
* Ms. Yeates 25 years old

* Woman in earlier, police claim similar case, also 25 years old

* 2 x encircled numbers ' 25 ' in photos of Clifton bridge pylons

* Ms. Yeates' body discovered 25 December

* Alleged 25,000 people per year as per quoted post
[in fact, 250,000 per year, but it still starts with '25']

According to Lenin, there are no coincidences

I'm convinced.
 
Is it fair though? You can't swing a cat around the David Icke forum without hitting 2 or 3 stundie nominations.
 
This isn't really a conspiracy stundie, just an incredibly stupid comment by the Washington Post's Ezra Klein

The issue of the Constitution is that the text is confusing because it was written more than 100 years ago and what people believe it says differs from person to person and differs depending on what they want to get done.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-...nfusing-nature-old-constitution#ixzz19ckIHZ00

The text is confusing? How long ago was it writen?
 
Is it fair though? You can't swing a cat around the David Icke forum without hitting 2 or 3 stundie nominations.

I finally visited the David Icke forum after seeing that it's the mother lode of Stundies. Little did I realize that what shows up here isn't even the tip of the iceberg. I spent about 20 minutes there. I WANT MY 20 MINUTES BACK!!
 
I finally visited the David Icke forum after seeing that it's the mother lode of Stundies. Little did I realize that what shows up here isn't even the tip of the iceberg. I spent about 20 minutes there. I WANT MY 20 MINUTES BACK!!

Dude, 20 minutes is way too long. I'm afraid to tell you that you may have suffered brain damage from that long of an exposure.
 

Back
Top Bottom