Bush talks about EXPLOSIVES in building (on 9/11?)

adkinsjr

Thinker
adkinsjr
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
206
This is one of the worst distortions that I've seen from the cult since the "Pull it" canard.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USnxe7hxP4I

So basically the uploader is "just asking questions." But isn't he doing it in such a way that the gullible believers in the "truth" cult's religion will reach an erroneous conlcusion? There's a brief hint of reality in the description, which I suspect few actually read:

It sounds eerily like what happened at the WTC on 9/11. Was he referring that the "terrorists" planted explosives in the towers or that foiled plots had planned to use that tactic? Or was he referring to the WTC?

-lonelantern , uploader of the video
Click to expand...

Bush is of course talking about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who allededly divuldged information on numerous plots, inlcuding the 1993 BOMBINGS of the WTC. The video deceptively tries to convince viewers that Bush is accidently slipping up and admitting that there were bombs in the building on 9/11. Read some of the comments, here's a good one:

he was reading it, and i believe a very brave person wrote that speech in order to expose Bush and his regime.

Hows the moment of conscience he gets when he reads the word "explosives' before thinking about it. His thoughts would have gone along the lines of ...

"oh ****, we aren't supposed to be saying that, who wrote this speech? he is going to die!"

Everybody knows Bush never proof read his speeches and this day he became a victim of that. He continues on after stumbling o as he cant question his own speech, everybody would know that he is a liar then. Kudos to the speech writer. A brave man

-ausdiv , random gullible douche
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 
Yet another example how 911 kooks will distort things and lie to support their delusions.
 
The Platypus said:
Yet another example how 911 kooks will distort things and lie to support their delusions.
Click to expand...

I messaged him a few months ago to see what he would say. He just continued to assure me that he's just asking the question, is bush talking about 9/11? It's SO preposterous because clearly Bush is talking about other bombings, likely the 1993 WTC attacks.

I think he knows that his viewers aren't smart enough (since many of them are truthers) to simply look up the name Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. He's had well over a million veiws, and just read the comments left by gullible brainwashed cult sheep.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
This thread is another good example of how 9/11 official story dupes thrive on ad hominem and little else.
 
I remember him giving that speech and that clip is out of context. I think what the deal was is this....the terrorists planned on putting the explosives higher up than the previous attack (car garage was area of 1st one I believe) but later ditched the explosives idea altogether and used the jets instead.

He was jus saying they had dug up the actual original idea I believe.

BTW aren't those airliners not airplanes but rather jets? I thought airplanes used prop engines.
 
tempesta29 said:
This thread is another good example of how 9/11 official story dupes thrive on ad hominem and little else.
Click to expand...

This from a member of an entire cult that openly preaches to each other to refer to tons of people as murderers and liars. And also that everyone outside the cult are mindless gov't loving sheeple that need to wake up because we blindly follow some "official story", in the first place.

But how dare those "official story dubes" thrive on ad hominems...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Bush is not talking about the 1993 bombings. Apparently he is talking about bombings that supposedly have been prevented after 9/11. Here is the context (I bolded the parts that have been edited out of the youtube video in the OP):

… The bill would also provide clear rules for our personnel involved in detaining and questioning captured terrorists. The information that the Central Intelligence Agency has obtained by questioning men like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States.

For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.

He gave us information that helped uncover al Qaeda cells' efforts to obtain biological weapons.

We've also learned information from the CIA program that has helped stop other plots, including attacks on the U.S. Marine base in East Africa, or American consulate in Pakistan, or Britain's Heathrow Airport. ...
Click to expand...


georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
 
Muc said:
Bush is not talking about the 1993 bombings. Apparently he is talking about bombings that supposedly have been prevented after 9/11. Here is the context (I bolded the parts that have been edited out of the youtube video in the OP):




georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
Click to expand...

Thank you, I knew that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gave information on numerous plots. This can be learned just from looking at wikipedia. :rolleyes:
 
adkinsjr said:
Thank you, I knew that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gave information on numerous plots. This can be learned just from looking at wikipedia. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


That was not my point. Did you even read my post or did you just feel like getting sarcastic on a newbie?
 
Muc said:
That was not my point. Did you even read my post or did you just feel like getting sarcastic on a newbie?
Click to expand...

What? I don't know what you're talking about, or where you thought I was being sarcastic. :confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom