Look Here For a Commentary on the Latest News from AE911Truth

[Telltale Tom]

Whoopee Ae911truth are going to publish monthly news, and Richard Gage, our very own Architect of Destruction has kicked it off with a very nice piece.

Not much technical news I am afraid but lots of information about fund raising, volunteer efforts and how to volunteer

Our membership is still increasing, now that we have translated our site into many languages. So last year we were running at 0.6 new signatures per day and we are now up to about 1.2 members per day. So if we carry on at the same rate in 20 years we will have nearly 10,000 signatures. However if we keep doubling every year then we could have as many as 460 miliion signatures in 20 years. We need to the Arabic and Chinese version to really boost our numbers. I am sure that there are lots of engineers in Iran that believe it was an inside job…. And hell if we can’t verify the signatures then we are sure that you won’t be able to refute them.

Unfortunately we don’t have any new Professional Engineers in New York. So its only three members from the Sate where it happened, and two of them have let their licenses expire. Don’t they teach kids anything at College ? And I have heard that one of the 8 Registered Architects in NY no longer believes. However we don’t need support from people that are supposed to know about these things, as long as we keep the big donors coming like Ed Asner and Charlie Sheen.

I do hope you will all visit the ae911truth web site as that will help keep the traffic numbers up.! See you can’t win. We just need you to put some money in our bank..!

 

[Horatius]

Now this is some quality Truthing. Nice to see you back, TT.

 

[leftysergeant]

I just took a look at the YouTube channel page for AE911T.

Holly Kirby has more subscribers than those clowns.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

"So if we carry on at the same rate in 20 years we will have nearly 10,000 signatures."

LOl given the average of your demograpic it is likely your "members" (actually just signatures on a petition) will be dying as fast as they join.........and why would it matter how many you have in 20 years time? Everyone of any importance will be long dead by then!


wait this is spoof isn't it? you got me

 

[uke2se]

Telltale Tom is my favorite "truther".

 

[leftysergeant]

Nowhere else can you find a gathering of so many people so passionate about being wrong.

 

[Horatius]

Nowhere else can you find a gathering of so many people so passionate about being wrong.

Yeah, but at least TT realizes it.

 

[Edx]

I would never have the dedication to keep this joke up

 

[Telltale Tom]

I am not sure I understand the contradiction between ae911truth being a big supporter of Project Censored and our bold claims of world-wide TV and radio publicity and interviews.

We should really try and separate these articles in future

 

[Horatius]

I would never have the dedication to keep this joke up

Well, apparently:

I am not sure I understand the contradiction between ae911truth being a big supporter of Project Censored and our bold claims of world-wide TV and radio publicity and interviews.

We should really try and separate these articles in future

...this stuff just writes itself!

 

[leftysergeant]

I have to wonder how Project Censored feels about having a millstone like Little Dickie hung around their necks.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Hey, happy birthday Lefty.


TT, nice to see you, again. Keep up the good work. Nothing beats seeing Little Richie Poor hoisting himself on his own petard. I've been looking for video of his great trip to China that was set for October, but haven't found anything. Did he cancel? (Or did the stooges not come up with the airfare?) I figured it to be all over the news, fer shure.

ETA: China Trip

I see it's been delayed until January. And apparently he's planning to come to Hong Kong. Better not be the week I have to be in Central China, dammit! I want some enlightenment.

Their mention of this buried in the middle of the page of an early November article about some other non-event, and seems to be the only time they've ever mentioned it. It's now middle of December. What are the chances that it's been re-scheduled and they'll tell us about it in February?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Not much technical news I am afraid but lots of information about fund raising, volunteer efforts and how to volunteer

I do hope you will all visit the ae911truth web site as that will help keep the traffic numbers up.! See you can’t win. We just need you to put some money in our bank..!

Sucking in the money from brainwashed morons still I see!

When are you people gonna learn that common sense, physics & evidence is the key to a better education rather than listening to a fool like Richard Gage, who worked over 20 yrs. in the fire proofing business only to throw out his 20 yrs. for some hairbrained scheme to sucker fools out of their money for his retirement funds?

You people just don't get it! Send your money to him, the quicker you do it the broker you get.

 

[alienentity]

Happy Birthday Lefty!

I probably won't check back here until January, so y'all enjoy the holidays..

AE

 

[triforcharity]

Nice hair!

And yes, a very happy birthday to the Sarge. Here is a bottle of Crown Royal Cask Number 16 for you. Only the best.

/OT

 

[Horatius]

If the bag isn't purple, I'm not drinking it, nor using it to hold my marbles. [/CanadianKid]

 

[leftysergeant]

Thank you all for reminding me how far over the hill and physically pfffft! I am. I might need a nip or two to keep on dealing with the inanities of AE911T and their sort.

Bear in mind, MT, that we have probably seen all of the "evidence" you lot may have to show the world. Some of us have more than time enough to hold it up and have a good laugh at it and the sorts of people who think it is relevant or informative of much.

 

[TJM]

Thank you all for reminding me how far over the hill and physically pfffft! I am. I might need a nip or two to keep on dealing with the inanities of AE911T and their sort.

Nonsense Sarge:

Old age and treachery will overcome youth and enthusiasm.

Happy birthday Sarge, keep knocking'em dead.

 

[Telltale Tom]

Bear in mind, MT, that we have probably seen all of the "evidence" you lot may have to show the world. Some of us have more than time enough to hold it up and have a good laugh at it and the sorts of people who think it is relevant or informative of much.

Here are the Pillars of Evidence that have been the same for the last couple of years.

You have to remember that our members do not believe in all the evidence listed on our web site, they just have to believe in any of the evidence. I don't think that even Richard Gage believes in the squibs contributing to the failure, since it has been ridiculed so much, but I know some people still love them.

If you look at our web-site ae911truth.org, you will see that we list the top 14 reasons why WTC 1 and 2 collapsed. They are our Pillars of evidence, so to speak. However we have a stronger belief in some rather than others and it is easy to show which are the current favorites of ae911truth.

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration.
This is still a major keystone of our argument.
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution We don't quite say that we would expect the building to fall over, as we would be subject to even more ridicule... but some of our members think that the building should have collapsed more like a tree and this statement keeps them happy.
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction.
You will have noticed that we don't list the nearly freefall collapse thing in our headlines any more, ever since Richard declared it fell at 2/3rd's free-fall. We just leave the nearly freefall claims for our power points. We haven't speculated at what speed we thought it would collapse, because we know that steel buildings don't collapse in fire... or for any other reason for that matter.
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
Yes, we like to rely on the parts of the eye-witness testimonies that support the CD theory and that will continue to be a major part of our offering, although sadly none of the flashes were caught on camera. And we dont like the NYFD who say that they were describing large, sudden noises.
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
We like to keep this point as far away from the point that it collapsed within its own footprint.
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking Well that's gone quiet because no-one really understands what we mean by this and why its evidence of CD.
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds.
Thats pretty much in the same bag as item 6 above: we used to have a few slides in our presentation that described how much energy was given off ny the explosion... but it looked a bit mad. And since no-one really understands what we mean by pyroclastic the "pyroclastic-like" works for us. We now admit that the big bang that caused the explosive failure wasn't accompanied by any explosion type noise.
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found Yes we usually try and keep this point as far away from the first point; as if it did fall straight down, it would not also fall straight out
9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front Yes this is the squibs thing and we don't talk about them much now, since there is little point in trying to weaken the building with squibs, if the building itself demonstrated it could survive the impact of a rather large plane and an explosion that was slightly larger than the squibs, at a much higher and weaker level.
10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
Again this is a little embarrassing because if the splice joint had one twentieth of the strength of the element, is it surprising that most of the elements failed at the splice. So we don't talk about this so much either.
11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises Yes this seems to be a big point, but I dont get it really since we couldn't find the pools at the bottom of the towers...not very big ones anyway and not spread out like a pool. Perhaps the NYFD hid it. Nothing bigger than a chiller and even the chillers still looked like mechanical equipment
12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples. This is one of our real strong points, since nobody really understand what we are talking about.
13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples yes we really love this one, which is the same as 12
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire. I guess that this is part of our most credible evidence: there have been no complete collapses from any other super tall tower thay was hit by a large aircraft.

 

[leftysergeant]

Here are the Pillars of Evidence that have been the same for the last couple of years.

And they are as laughable today as the first day they appeared on the web.

You have to remember that our members do not believe in all the evidence listed on our web site, they just have to believe in any of the evidence. I don't think that even Richard Gage believes in the squibs contributing to the failure, since it has been ridiculed so much, but I know some people still love them.

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration.

Well, there was no other path to take and there was some deceleration. The most resistance was in the cores and most of the stuff just went around that resistance.

2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution.

Well, it's no more unusal than had someone peeled a giant banana there.

We don't quite say that we would expect the building to fall over, as we would be subject to even more ridicule... but some of our members think that the building should have collapsed more like a tree and this statement keeps them happy.

Pure comedy gold.

Nothing happening at the top of a building is going to make it tip over. This is grade school stuff. It's like chopping off the top of a tree and expecting the trunk to fall over.

3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction.

] It took almost an hour to so weaken one tower that it would fail. Here's the deal, though, aboput "rapid onset." Once a column fails, it fails TOTALLY That means it just dumps its load. It can't put things down neatly.

4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

And none of them report anything like a CD cutting charge. Stuff blows up in fires. That accounts for some opf the "explosions." People who didn't witness the collapses thought they were explosions. Those who did see it don't.

5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally

So? There was a strong wind blowing straight down the inside of the building, full of rubble. This will shove steel outward, and hundres of feet in the air, it does not take much of a shove to make stuff land hundreds of feet away. The steel was driven by the same force as was the dust. The dust had only the energy to climb up over the tops of the perimeter columns that had not yet fallen over. No bombs here, guy.

6. [/B]Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking Well that's gone quiet because no-one really understands what we mean by this and why its evidence of CD.

Well, actually, it isn't evidence. Floors colliding with each other break into pieces. Repeated collisions result in smaller and smaller pieces. That simple, really.

]7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds.

OY,GEWALD! It looked nothing like a pyroclastic flow. It was a bloody TURBIDIUTY flow. How many times need you people be told this? It occurrs in every demolition and has nothing to do with explosives. It is the result of breaking concrete, normally, but in the toiwers it also involved breaking drywall. Lots of freaking drywall.

8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found

Well, of course not. They broke up as they collided with each other on the way down.

9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front

Bull flops. Squibs start at almost 100% and then fade out. The ejections that the squib nutters shriek about start out as whisps and fill up with smoke and dust. Bass ackwards of squibs. It is dust forced down HVAC conduits.

10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

This is not surprising in any way iff you know anything about construction materials.

11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises Yes this seems to be a big point, but I dont get it really since we couldn't find the pools at the bottom of the towers...not very big ones anyway and not spread out like a pool. Perhaps the NYFD hid it.

No. A NAZI piece of crap who dares not ever show his face in this country where a cop can see it invented the pools of melted steel. He's a liar. He's a Nazi. That's what scumbuckets like Bollyn do for a living.

12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples.

No, they didn't.

13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

Again, no, they didn't.

14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire.

But that is only becasuse no other such structures were hit by multi-ton flying objects full of accelerant and left to burn until the steel got too hot to stand up by itself.