• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Witness describes explosions at North Tower

ergo said:
No, but when hundreds of people are saying the same thing, then you have to take that as evidence that something of that nature was occurring, and you investigate. Or you at the very least include that testimony in your reports.
Click to expand...

hey ergo, What does this sound like to you at around the 42 second mark?

(Forgot how to make video embedded)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
Lefty, your comments are way beyond the pale, here. Who are you to judge what someone who was actually there is saying?

And he wasn't in the ******* building.
Click to expand...

I was there. Heard no bombs, heard no explosions prior to collapse. Neither are their video of these explosions.

I was there. I was covered in dust. Some guy (don't have any idea who) gave me a bottle of water to wash out my eyes and mouth. Why is this guy looking like he just stepped out of his apartment?

ETA: Let me clarify. Explosions IMMEDIATLY preceeding collapse.
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
Your bee dunking sites don't debunk anything. They are just an amateur, and often grossly inaccurate interpretation of what witnesses actually say.
Click to expand...

Sadly, most of the accounts of hearing "explosions" are from people that saw jumpers hitting the ground.

Your ignorance is literally gross.
 
"Bee dunking?" What the hell does that even mean? "Duh bunkers" was at least clever in a juvenile sort of way.
 
#1. who is "JRED"?

#2. did this guy see the "device" before it exploded? cause all sorts of things explode due to fire.
 
I doubt I'll get any answer that makes sense with this but here's my question:

When two large buildings are engulfed in multifloor fires where gas lines are severed, and god knows what chemicals or electronics have been cluster ------'d by an impact and fuel deflagration. Why would extensive reports of explosions be unusual in the first place?
 
Grizzly Bear said:
Why would extensive reports of explosions be unusual in the first place?
Click to expand...

This question has been asked a dozen different ways in a dozen different threads about witness reports of "explosions". You get it. I get it. All of us get it except these silly truthers.

I don't understand it at all.
 
Last edited:
there is ZERO physical evidence of any explosive devices placed inside WTC 1,2, or 7.

all we have is confusion by folks who think they heard and saw something blow up.
 
This again?

I wonder if we'll have to suffer through 9 more years of stupid people misunderstanding physics and evidence or if it'll die out after the 10 year anniversary.
 
uke2se said:
This again?

I wonder if we'll have to suffer through 9 more years of stupid people misunderstanding physics and evidence or if it'll die out after the 10 year anniversary.
Click to expand...

3 letters: JFK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom