Ok... You make the claim quoted below, then don't even acknowledge you were wrong when we demonstrate that you were.
Above and beyond all of that, why are you under the illusion that the eroded steel indicates anything suspicious? For the second (or third, or something) time in this thread: The Worcester group had determined that the reaction temperatures were between 550
o and 850
o C, and possibly up to 940
oC, but no higher. They also determined that such a reaction that would leave such a series of microformations would have to take place on the order of hours. What thermate reaction would never exceed 940
oC and last on the order of hours? The point here is that the steel had indeed been studied, and the results of those studies rule out thermate. And that's
before you take into account that this was a very small number of pieces that were corroded, let alone
any of the other arguments that
have been mustered to refute the claim.
There is no there there. You are suffering under the delusion that there must be some proof out there for intentional demolitions of the towers. All of the reasons you offer in support of this have been presented in the past and shown to be distortions at best, outright falsities at worst. What you need to do is study
the event itself, as well as all the knowledge that's been produced about it (at least read the WPI writeups, as well as Banovich and Foeck's stuff to figure out where you're going wrong with the thermate claims). What you need to
stop doing is simply bringing up long disproven trutherisms. Search this forum for points before you bring them up; that'll save you from covering already well trod grounds. But one way or another,
learn what really happened. If you continue presenting distortions and disproven talking points, you're going to get nowhere.
