• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Witness describes explosions at North Tower

Quiproquo

Thinker
Quiproquo
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
211
Hi JRED,

Here is a link to a recently released video of a witness describing bombs taking out the floors of the North Tower.

When it comes down to it, there is no need to allude to obtuse and demeaning "irreduscible delusion" explanations to undermine why many people do not believe in the official narrative. Do we believe in what we hear and what we see or do we believe in l-o-g-i-c put forth by you guys?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozTnINH6Yls&feature=player_embedded
 
He looks like a lying SOB. He describes the tower coming right down above him.

He has no dust on his clothes. Utter BS.
 
Quiproquo said:
Here is a link to a recently released video of a witness describing bombs taking out the floors of the North Tower.
Click to expand...

Explosions are commonplace in fires, and loud sounds are commonplace in building collapses. No explosions are heard, on the soundtracks of videos of the collapses, that show the required temporal relationship to the collapses for them to be the immediate cause of those collapses. The opinion of a witness doesn't actually change any of that.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
No explosions are heard, on the soundtracks of videos of the collapses, that show the required temporal relationship to the collapses for them to be the immediate cause of those collapses.
Click to expand...

More importantly, the video of the fire fighters standing directly in the footprint of the dust plume picked up no such sounds. That the "witness" was even farther away than that is obvious from the lack of dust in his hair or on his clothes.
 
Yea, because as we all know, in the real world investigators always make determinations simply based on anomalous witness testimonies and not on the preponderance of evidence :rolleyes:
 
leftysergeant said:
He looks like a lying SOB. He describes the tower coming right down above him.

He has no dust on his clothes. Utter BS.
Click to expand...

Wow, that's quite a claim you made there. As you can see this is still before WTC 7 has come down. So in your mind, a guy decides to make up a whopper of a story a few hours after seeing the towers collapse because why?

Also, the vantage point he describes would suggest he was not that close to the towers, which would explain why he wasn't covered in dust.

If he's lying, he must be a pretty good actor because he's obviously choked up and full of adrenaline. But of course he's a "lying SOB" because his testimony shatters your illusions.
 
This man's one testimony is completely contradictory to hundreds of others who describe nothing like this, in addition to all of the cameras recording that day that did not pick up anything close to what he is describing. He is either very confused about what he saw, or he is exaggerating what he saw to make it more dramatic (As if it wasn't dramatic enough).

Why choose to use this witness testimony as opposed to the others who do not describe his scenario? Also, why does none of the video footage show anything like what he described?
 
RedIbis said:
Wow, that's quite a claim you made there. As you can see this is still before WTC 7 has come down. So in your mind, a guy decides to make up a whopper of a story a few hours after seeing the towers collapse because why?

Also, the vantage point he describes would suggest he was not that close to the towers, which would explain why he wasn't covered in dust.

If he's lying, he must be a pretty good actor because he's obviously choked up and full of adrenaline. But of course he's a "lying SOB" because his testimony shatters your illusions.
Click to expand...

Red, this is nonsense and you know it. None of the video footage corroborates his story and no other witness testimonies do either. Why would you choose to believe him over hundreds of other witnesses and video footage?
 
Quad4_72 said:
Red, this is nonsense and you know it. None of the video footage corroborates his story and no other witness testimonies do either. Why would you choose to believe him over hundreds of other witnesses and video footage?
Click to expand...

Is this a rhetorical question?
 
RedIbis said:
Wow, that's quite a claim you made there. As you can see this is still before WTC 7 has come down. So in your mind, a guy decides to make up a whopper of a story a few hours after seeing the towers collapse because why?

Also, the vantage point he describes would suggest he was not that close to the towers, which would explain why he wasn't covered in dust.

If he's lying, he must be a pretty good actor because he's obviously choked up and full of adrenaline. But of course he's a "lying SOB" because his testimony shatters your illusions.
Click to expand...

his testimony shatters your illusions
Click to expand...

It does?

What does he say that contradicts the idea that the towers were destroyed by fire and impact damage?
 
Last edited:
They have even been poisoning our food and water supply, our vaccines(especially childrens),
Click to expand...

This one actually makes me angry. Most conspiracy theories are pretty harmless--9/11 Truthers aren't hurting anybody as long as they stay in their parent's basements--but this one, this one can potentially deter people from receiving life-saving treatment.

Woo kills.
 
twinstead said:
I will never understand why the police don't investigate the railroad companies for causing tornadoes. Hell, there's plenty of witnesses who report hearing trains during tornadoes.

The government is protecting the railroads. Conspiracy? You be the judge.
Click to expand...

back off Twinstead....Norfolk Southerns branch of the NWO prefers that the public still believes in Tornados :D
 
Your bee dunking sites don't debunk anything. They are just an amateur, and often grossly inaccurate interpretation of what witnesses actually say.

This is simply another statement among hundreds of others from witnesses, including television commentators, reporting explosions. Bee dunkers' only responses to these are to automatically discredit without basis. Eg: "Why do no other witness statements make this claim?" Um, they do. That's why we keep pointing them out to you? :rolleyes:

That bee dunkers seem so intent on discrediting witnesses while providing no evidence for their own claims ("NO reports of explosions!") shows that they're not interested in the actual evidence but in reinforcing a false story.
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
But of course he's a "lying SOB" because his testimony shatters your illusions.
Click to expand...

No. Because the lying SOB said it was happening "right above us."

And he didn't even get dust. You really need to learn to analyse evidence a bit better.

The dude was probably just looking to get his ugly mug on televison.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom