brazenlilraisin
...tart
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2010
- Messages
- 660
By all means, let us procure with civil discussion! I'm sure we're all capable of a rationed debate. 
ha ha hagood one
any effort to procure with civilized discusion?
ha ha hagood one
any effort to procure with civilized discusion?
I DEMAND SATISFACTION!!!
Hey Michal,
How 'bout that UL report on the swiss cheese steel?

I'm curious?????......If a thermitic reation did not cause the swiss cheese like, paper scroll curled, gaping holed, sulfidized steel........then what could, and don't give me that diels fuel tank BS.
LMAO!!
I'm curious?????......If a thermitic reation did not cause the swiss cheese like, paper scroll curled, gaping holed, sulfidized steel........then what could, and don't give me that diels fuel tank BS.
Well, if you read the source that describes the appearance of the steel, then you'll see that it attributes it to eutectic melting along grain boundaries due to the presence of temperatures approaching 1000ºC and acidic corrosive agents for extended periods of time in the rubble pile following the collapse of WTC7. The source of the corrosive agents may be gypsum from drywall in the building rubble, which is known to decompose at these temeratures and release oxides of sulphur, which will mix with water to produce sulphuric acid.
So we have one plausible mechanism by which this effect could have been produced. Compare this to the thermite theory; so far, it has been shown that it's possible to produce a sharp edge on steel using a thermitic reaction, but the "swiss cheese like, paper scroll curled" and "sulfidized" bits have never yet been shown to be possible to produce using thermite. At present, the acid attack in the rubble pile fire is the only fully formed theory.
Saying "If Thermite didn't cause this, what did?" is an interesting informal fallacy, which I'm not entirely sure of the name of. The question implies that thermite could have caused it, when that premise is never established. It's maybe a variation on the complex question fallacy, in which anybody answering it at all is judged to have accepted its implicit premise. I do not accept any such premise; as far as I am aware, it is impossible for a thermitic reaction to have produced the results described, therefore it must have been something else.
Dave
I'm curious?????......If a thermitic reation did not cause the swiss cheese like, paper scroll curled, gaping holed, sulfidized steel........then what could ?
What was your imagined cause of temperatures approaching 1000 C?
I don't have an imagined cause, sorry. I can suggest a real cause, namely the fires that are known to have burned in the rubble pile for several weeks, but for imagined causes you'd be better off asking your fellow truthers to make up some new pretend properties of thermite. They're quite good at that.
Dave
This seems odd. You accept that there were fires, but not that there was sufficient oxygen and fuel to sustain them? What are the three things a fire needs, MM?So you 'imagine' that rubble pile fires, without benefit of any thermitic material, were able to obtain sufficient oxygen and high energy fuel to attain and sustain, temperatures approaching 1000 C?
That argument fails to persuade me and 9/11 Truth supporters.
If it works for you and the Official Conspiracy Borg, go for it.
MM