Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

funk de fino said:
Quite possibly the dumbest thing you have ever posted. How many pilots were there compared to how many passengers? You could probably take a couple of 12 year olds if they tried to mug you but you couldnt take 50 of them.

How did the body parts and personal effects of the passengers get in the hole Red?
Click to expand...

Talk about dumb. How threatening would those 12 year olds be if they were behind a locked door?
 
RedIbis said:
Talk about dumb. How threatening would those 12 year olds be if they were behind a locked door?
Click to expand...
A flimsy door.

Red, are you ever going to answer all those questions you're ignoring?

Did you see all those pictures of airplane debris?
 
RedIbis said:
If it was so flimsy how come the passengers never got past it?
Click to expand...
Because there were uys on the other side holding it shut, but they couldn't hold out much longer.

Now Red, I'm going to put this in big bold letters because you seem to have missed it...

Did you see all those pictures of airplane debris?
 
RedIbis said:
Talk about dumb. How threatening would those 12 year olds be if they were behind a locked door?
Click to expand...

Are you dumb? They weren't 12 year olds and it was a flimsy door. They had a trolley to smash it in. You can hear it in the CVR tape apparently.

RedIbis said:
If it was so flimsy how come the passengers never got past it?
Click to expand...

Too funny. They crashed it before they could and the FDR proves that. You are right off the deep end now.
 
I'd imagine the door was flimsy by today's standards, but still it would have needed some force to open it. The passengers just didn't have enough time.
 
The hijackers were also, to some degree, able to manipulate the laws of gravity within a certain limited space so that the rebels could not find a place to stand and manipulate the door.
 
Didn't they (AQ) have 3 guys left in the cockpit? At the end of the day a door can only fit so many people through it. Kind of a bottle neck. Think of the movie 300. Didn't matter how many were behind the attacking force only a few could engage those in the cockpit at a time.
 
JackDaniels said:
There is no video of jets crashing near Shanksville and into the Pentagon, while there's tons of it for jets crashing into the wtc's.
Click to expand...

There's also no video of the secret NWO ninjas planting silent thermite bombs in the WTC.

So if your "logic" were consistent, that would mean.... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
CHF said:
There's also no video the secret NWO ninjas planting silent thermite bombs in the WTC.

So if your "logic" were consistent, that would mean.... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
If there's video, it means there's a conspiracy. If there's not video, it means there's a conspiracy.

You know how logic works in TrutherLandTM.
 
WildCat said:
Because there were uys on the other side holding it shut, but they couldn't hold out much longer.

Now Red, I'm going to put this in big bold letters because you seem to have missed it...

Did you see all those pictures of airplane debris?
Click to expand...

Oh he sees them, and he knows full well that it's Flight 93.

His ignoring of your question means he is either a) pretending to be a dumb truther, or b) mentally ill.

I'd like to give Red the benefit of the doubt and assume he falls into column A, but it's hard to tell sometimes with these people.
 
I actually don't think that RedIbis is dumb. Of course that makes his position (whatever that is; he refuses to tell us) even more reprehensible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom