Open Letter to Dave Thomas

[dafydd]

All remaining columns buckling over 8 stories and the building only losing two feet is not negligible resistance. It is resistance significant enough to impede the building's acceleration and therefore there could be no free fall.

Implicit in NIST's loony crackpot theory is that such buckling provides no resistance. But they present absolutely no evidence that this could happen or indeed did happen. IOW their theory is faith-based crackpot pseudo-science.

When can we look forward to reading your paper,complete with the math.

 

[cmatrix]

When can we look forward to reading your paper,complete with the math.

When can we look forward to reading any paper by anyone, complete with the math that explains how the free fall period happened in the fire-initiated collapse of WTC 7?

 

[triforcharity]

wtc.nist.gov

When should we expect your paper?

 

[cmatrix]

wtc.nist.gov

When should we expect your paper?

Point out the exact page and paragraph where they explain the free fall period. Unless of course you're completely full of spit. I know how I'm betting.

 

[DGM]

Point out the exact page and paragraph where they explain the free fall period. Unless of course you're completely full of spit. I know how I'm betting.

Why limit your understanding to a single page/paragraph?

Read:

NCSTAR 1-9, Vol 2, Chapter 12. Then when you get really brave, read the whole thing.

 

[triforcharity]

Point out the exact page and paragraph where they explain the free fall period. Unless of course you're completely full of spit. I know how I'm betting.

If you read the entire thing, it will give you some understanding of collapse analysis, and you SHOULD be able to figure it out.

When should we expect your paper?

Can I recommend a journal for you?

 

[dafydd]

When can we look forward to reading any paper by anyone, complete with the math that explains how the free fall period happened in the fire-initiated collapse of WTC 7?

Dodge noted.We all know you can't do the math.

 

[dc1971]

Point out the exact page and paragraph where they explain the free fall period. Unless of course you're completely full of spit. I know how I'm betting.

Round and round cmatrix goes! Where cmatrix stops, no one knows!

 

[dafydd]

Round and round cmatrix goes! Where cmatrix stops, no one knows!

First class entertainment watch him wriggle like a herring on a griddle.

 

[DaveThomasNMSR]

cmatrix, the YouTube

Surfing around idly, I stumbled on this YouTube, apparently by our very own cmatrix, that explains a lot about his credibility, engineering knowledge, rapier wit, that sort of thing.

View, and be Amazed.

"Jay Reftard Debunks 9/11 Truthers"

​

If this really is cmatrix, well then ...

 

[Grizzly Bear]

A fine model of civility he makes... *thumbsup*

 

[TruthersLie]

Surfing around idly, I stumbled on this YouTube, apparently by our very own cmatrix, that explains a lot about his credibility, engineering knowledge, rapier wit, that sort of thing.

View, and be Amazed.

"Jay Reftard Debunks 9/11 Truthers"

​

If this really is cmatrix, well then ...

ROFLMAO.

Oh my.

I'm in awe. He nailed the position of skeptics completely. I'll have to reevaluate my entire life due to his fantastic oration skills.

 

[dafydd]

First class entertainment watch him wriggle like a herring on a griddle.

"He twists and turns like a twisty turny thing."'

 

[beachnut]

It was masterful, how he squeezed all his physics and engineering knowledge into one short presentation. He sets the standard; for being compassionate to those with special needs. I was impressed. I had to download this video and save it in the bit bucket.

 

[tfk]

If this really is cmatrix, well then ...

Yup, it's really him...

http://knol.google.com/k/michael-fu...11-theory-violates-the/1hwr2894wxokh/10#v­iew

(upper right corner).


tom

 

[DaveThomasNMSR]

Yup, it's really him...

http://knol.google.com/k/michael-fu...11-theory-violates-the/1hwr2894wxokh/10#v­iew

(upper right corner).


tom

Game, set, match!

 

[catsmate]

Yup, it's really him...

http://knol.google.com/k/michael-fu...11-theory-violates-the/1hwr2894wxokh/10#v­iew

(upper right corner).


tom

Oh wow. Such a well of ignorance and arrogance. I particularly like his rant about Emergence and his inability to differentiate between photons and protons...............

 

[dafydd]

Oh wow. Such a well of ignorance and arrogance. I particularly like his rant about Emergence and his inability to differentiate between photons and protons...............

He's a truther,what did you expect?

 

[grandmastershek]

He's a truther,what did you expect?

True enough. In truth land iron rich = pure iron.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Point out the exact page and paragraph where they explain the free fall period. Unless of course you're completely full of spit. I know how I'm betting.

I'm reading your mind CMatrix, you're thinking about the 2.25 seconds of free fall, you're also thinking that it's proof that it was "explosives", rather than fire, that brought down WTC7. You're also thinking that you're right & everyone's wrong.

The 2.25 second free fall is a fraction of free fall. Doesn't prove explosives! Sorry, you lose!