• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
It also wouldn't do anything. Buildings aren't homogeneous objects. They don't have a single natural frequency that will result in resonance when excited by a tiny force. One mode might excite, but another mode will damp.

Did Tesla not say it then ?
 
Just asking, has any troll dropped by JREF for a while and then put a public seminar on the JREF calender to more fully expose their data to JREF scrutiny? I'm guessing it might be a first.

We've had a guy predict that he would blind James Randi on a certain date, cause the grass on World Cup fields to die on a certain date, etc.

Someone else warned that "God will destroy SF and LA with fire and brimstone from heaven" on Yom Kippur, 2009.

Lots of woo woo types make predictions here and expose themselves to public ridicule. Really, the attention-whoring thing isn't unique.
 
My professors thought well enough of my physics knowledge to give me good grades.

I'm curious. Did you actually ever meet any of these professors face-to-face?

Also, how much time elapsed between the time your check cleared and you got your diploma?
 
Since momentum is a function of both mass AND velocity, it really doesn't tell you much to know how fast something is moving, anyway.

How much would it hurt if a boat pinned you to a dock at 1 mph? A rowboat, not so much. An ocean liner...squish.

I was going to point that put after someone said how slow 22mph was.

:crowded:
 
What is the 'Flux' and where would I find it ?

Here you go:

Dysentery (formerly known as flux or the bloody flux) is an inflammatory disorder of the intestine, especially of the colon, that results in severe diarrhea containing mucus and/or blood in the feces[1] with fever and abdominal pain.[2] If left untreated, dysentery can be fatal.
 
Either that, or what I say about my results is true and I actually intend to do the seminar on December 1st.

Just asking, has any troll dropped by JREF for a while and then put a public seminar on the JREF calender to more fully expose their data to JREF scrutiny? I'm guessing it might be a first.

Far from the first. Here's a prime example:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/tags.php?tag=Anita+Ikonen


ETA: read the Million Dollar Challenge threads also.
 
My question to you is "how long would it have taken these concrete floors you speak of to fall twelve feet?"

Since the lower floor isn't going to fall before the upper floor hits it (under a collapse scenario), then how long will it take for the second floor plus the first floor that fell to fall down to the third floor in the sequence?

Etc. going all the way down adds up to more than a minute.[/QUOTE]

Impossible. Whacky old Judy herself says that it only takes 9 seconds for a billiard ball to get from the failure zone to the sidewalk.

At most, the collapses toook 2.5 times that. Had the floors each come to a stop lasting more than half a second before collapsing, they would have eventually arrested collapse.

And even if they had, they wouldn't have generated metallic foam.


Well, freaking DUH!
 
Here you go:

Dysentery (formerly known as flux or the bloody flux) is an inflammatory disorder of the intestine, especially of the colon, that results in severe diarrhea containing mucus and/or blood in the feces[1] with fever and abdominal pain.[2] If left untreated, dysentery can be fatal.

Some consider the 'Flux' to be a pool or resource of human knowledge that we all stand in uo to our waists, and which connects us.. When you have a brilliant idea that you do nothing with and somebody suddenly exploits exactly that same idea- they plucked it from the flux where you floated it.

Some say that Tesla was in hardwired to the flux from where he received his unending stream of incredible knowledge. They say he woke up with the entire plan for the electric motor in the front of his mind.

That's the 'Flux' that I was wondering about.
 
...bla bla bla, ginger... bla bla bla... Star Wars Defense Initiative, but Ronald Reagan came up with that name, not Dr. Wood.

Actually, it was NEVER named Star Wars Defense Initiative... The abbreviation was SDI - Strategic Defense Initiative!
 
I can't expect them to recognize a tiny object in a person's hand,

People can recognize cause and effect. You're in denial of this direct example.

The reason you need to do this is that your theory requires that a vague, hypothetical scenario (your electricity-beam-thingamajiggie) is the most direct causal relationship.

But you're wrong. That's all. You'll probably never admit it, but who cares? There are many fools in the world who believe silly things. You're just another in the vast crowd.:)


Can you give me any direct evidence of the hijackings on 9/11? I've been asking for them on another thread.
This is an asinine question. You're again on the road to another call to perfection fallacy. There is ample direct evidence, not worth discussing. You're wasting everybody's time with dumb questions like that.
 
Metallic foam disproves airplane crashes.

Do you have any idea how stupid that claim is? I don't think so. It's just sad if you actually believe what you write.

It's so messed up it's not worth countering. It's a truly worthless statement.

That's the best you got, ain't it? :eek: You're a truly awful scientist, I'm afraid. Really, really bad.
 
So how do you account for the hundreds of eyewitnesses, both at the WTC and the Pentagon and in Shanksville who all saw PLANES either fly into the buildings or crash into the ground?

And I'm not talking about the people who saw it on TV; I'm talking about the people who were physically THERE, on site, and who all described planes in their eyewitness testimony. You said in another thread you'd accept eyewitness testimony as evidence of hijackings; there are literally hundreds of witnesses to the planes hitting the buildings and crashing in the field. After the first plane hit, nearly everyone in downtown Manhattan was staring on an almost constant basis at the WTC complex, from varying distances. I have yet to hear of one who denied having seen an airplane that was in line of sight of the airplane's trajectory as it plowed into the South Tower. As for witnesses to the first plane; do you discount the word of several reputable first responders who actually SAW it happen? Watch the Naudet documentary; it contains footage of the very real plane smashing into a tower and the firefighters' reactions to it. And if you handwave away the video, then I suggest you go and actually SPEAK to the firefighters who witnessed it; I can't recall the ladder number offhand, but I'm sure someone here can remember it, as well as the names of the firefighters in question. I'm pretty sure they'll tell you they saw a PLANE hit the towers.

This is why Dr Blevin's mainly recycled canards are utterly worthless except as mild entertainment and as a cautionary tale. It's drivel from a University grad, but it's still drivel.
 
When you claim that the length of time that the debris pile was smoldering ("fuming " as you say) is atypical, what are you basing that claim on?

In other words, what are you comparing to that you would consider a typical length of time for an underground fire to burn?

More to the point: In 2004, the University Ridge apartment complex burned down in Clemson. That was a 3 story wood framed apartment complex of about 50 units. The fire department in Clemson spent 3 days pouring water on the smoldering ruins, in February, for a fire that was entirely above ground. Thankfully, no one was harmed in the fire.

In conclusion: Fire hot! Fire make burn! Fire burn long time! Make water go on fire!
 
The essence of science can be simple comparisons.

Compare this event that is called a plane crash on 9/11? Does the damage appear similar or different to other instances of planes crashing into buildings?

Compare my samples to other known WTC dust samples. Are they similar or different to these samples?

Show me a plane flown at extremely high speed into a building on purpose.

And yes, there is a difference between know WTC dust samples and yours. The others are not contaminated, and have been under the care, custody, and control of someone since very recently after 9/11.
 
Smoke behaves very differently from these fumes AND I smelled them, so I know what I'm talking about from a direct observation's standpoint.

Yes, and they are things like mold, mildew, rotting corpses, burning flesh, organics, different fuels, including diesel, gasoline, kerosene, and hydrocarbons. NOTHING was suprising to the firefighters. NOTHING.

Why do you not understand this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom