leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 18,863
They did not neccessarily let him into the danger zone. He may simply have been there when the collapses occurred.
They did not neccessarily let him into the danger zone. He may simply have been there when the collapses occurred.
Did anyone see anyone else planting explosive charges against columns?
Did they see anyone removing walls, floors or ceilings to plant explosives against columns?
Anyway, so I guess the point's been amply made that the power down was not at all routine. It was unprecedented.
I'm not sure what the fuss is all about. Those of us who manage high rise buildings will routinely shut down power on a whim and schedule guided tours to coincide. We do that because the high-pitched shrieking of a pissed off tenant is what we truly live for.
Makes for a great "haunted house" experience, too.
How many floors do you think would need to be rigged, AJM? For your one-way crush down?
I don't recall making any claims of a "one-way crush down". Perhaps you have me confused with someone else.
Sorry. Mistook you for one of the defenders of the official collapse theory.
They were in grade school at the time, IIRC.
How many floors do you think would need to be rigged, AJM? For your one-way crush down?
Actually, that's probably not a fair comment. My cats are smarter than a truther.
It's not hard to be smarter than a Truther.
So there was an unprecedented, non-routine power down. Now what?
Is this as far as it goes?