• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

another kook for you guys to 'debunk'

BigAl said:
Speaking for myself, I never said a power down was impossible, I said if it was real, it would leave a trail of paperwork and witnesses a mile wide and until this guy came forward no such confirmation existed.

Me? I've managed corporate 24x7 computer systems in very large and secure Manhattan bank buildings for 30+ years with experience with countless power downs.

I've also worked on bare-beams building renovations and with the unions, including Local 3, mentioned in the video. The idea that non-union or unknown people could even use the elevators without getting caught is silly.
Click to expand...
Are you really that naive?

MM
 
Just found this video, but I see someone beat me to it.

Typical JREF responses, handwaving away another serious anomaly, which obviously should have been investigated given the seriousness of this crime. At some point I'd like to compile all the anomalies together with all the bizarre and ridiculous beedunker responses to each of them and see what kind of a picture we get.



Anyway, back to Corbett's account, he talks about how "guided tours" were being accidentally led into secure areas. So obviously, yes, the building was still open to the public - bizarrely enough - but the secured areas had become not secure. This doesn't warrant investigation or mention in the 9/11 Commission Report about a supposed terrorist event that occurs three days after this? Really?

For those who are handwaving away the power-down as routine, Scott Forbes describes it as "unprecedented". They had been given three weeks notice, which he suggested was not actually a lot of time to back up their data or whatever it was they had to do.

For those who are arguing from incredulity about the labour and time required to set up demolition charges, you yourselves argue that global collapse can and even will always ensue from failure of a mere few floors--an idiotic proposition which is not backed up by any historical precedents, but the point is, why are you now arguing that CD prep would need to be done throughout the entire building? What happened to just a few floors? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
... For those who are handwaving away the power-down as routine, Scott Forbes describes it as "unprecedented". They had been given three weeks notice, which he suggested was not actually a lot of time to back up their data or whatever it was they had to do.

... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Do you use this, :rolleyes:, since you have no rational claims or evidence on 911?

:rolleyes: now all you need with your :rolleyes:, is some evidence, so your :rolleyes: is not the only support your have for your CD moronic lies and delusions, :rolleyes:.
 
Edited by Tricky: 
Edited for civility.

What was that, beachnut?!? I can't quite make out what you're saying! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ergo said:
What was that, beachnut?!? I can't quite make out what you're saying! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
You have no evidence to support your idiotic nonsense, and you can't do physics. Changing a post is reportable, don't do it. Try finding your evidence you never present to support your insane claims of CD.
 
Repeatedly posting off-topic is also reportable.

Anyway, back to Corbett's account, he talks about how "guided tours" were being accidentally led into secure areas. So obviously, yes, the building was still open to the public - bizarrely enough - but the secured areas had become not secure. This doesn't warrant investigation or mention in the 9/11 Commission Report about a supposed terrorist event that occurs three days after this? Really?

For those who are handwaving away the power-down as routine, Scott Forbes describes it as "unprecedented". They had been given three weeks notice, which he suggested was not actually a lot of time to back up their data or whatever it was they had to do.

For those who are arguing from incredulity about the labour and time required to set up demolition charges, you yourselves argue that global collapse can and even will always ensue from failure of a mere few floors--an idiotic proposition which is not backed up by any historical precedents, but the point is, why are you now arguing that CD prep would need to be done throughout the entire building? What happened to just a few floors?
 
beachnut said:
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Do you use this, :rolleyes:, since you have no rational claims or evidence on 911?

:rolleyes: now all you need with your :rolleyes:, is some evidence, so your :rolleyes: is not the only support your have for your CD moronic lies and delusions, :rolleyes:.
Click to expand...

LOL!

LOL!

LOL!

Oh my God, I think I just gave myself another hernia I'm laughing so hard!

LMAO!!!!
 
Three weeks isn't enough time to back up data? They do it at the end of every business day in companies like his all over the world. Did the WTC have some sort of alien technology in place that prevented them from doing that? Do you even read what you type and try to look for obvious flaws in what you say or are you just too dumb to see the gaping holes in your story?
 
ergo said:
For those who are arguing from incredulity about the labour and time required to set up demolition charges, you yourselves argue that global collapse can and even will always ensue from failure of a mere few floors--an idiotic proposition which is not backed up by any historical precedents, but the point is, why are you now arguing that CD prep would need to be done throughout the entire building? What happened to just a few floors?
Click to expand...

Because this is the first time in history two JETS have crashed into buildings! Any other building in New York City, given these circumstances, would have collapsed as well!

Also, you truthers keep missing the part about a big chunk of WTC7 being destroyed when WTC1 and 2 collapsed! Many photos show how this happened and many eyewitnesses were there and have explained what they saw! I don't know what else can be explained to get it through to you people but it's to the point now where I have run out of patience and I don't do that too easily!
 
point out the audio of the "explosives planted during a power shutdown" going off in this audio of the kevin Cosgrove phone call.

Debunked
 
ergo said:
They had been given three weeks notice, which he suggested was not actually a lot of time to back up their data or whatever it was they had to do.
Click to expand...


You might want to get that clarified, because the data backup claim is total BS. Even daily backups are dangerous for any critical business data. A 3-week long backup process (which implies that data can only be backed up every 3 weeks) is a disaster waiting to happen.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom