• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
I've been studying the dust for nine years, but I obtained my first sample of the dust within the past year.

I hope you can forgive the tardiness of my report. I hope you can wait until December 1.
Click to expand...

1) How the **** were you "studying" dust without any samples for eight years?
2) You only received your sample a year or so ago? So what you are really saying is that there is no reason whatsoever to believe that it came from the WTC and that even if you prove that it is mostly iron it is in no way evidence that steel from the WTC was dustified.
3) A year would be much more than enough for any competent scientist to do a thorough analysis of the dust and complete a report.
 
bill smith said:
I think that at 40 feet a second we would see some dissociation of the molecules as they repelled each other. As it is the dust appears to be inert.

If you are right then the Casimir effect is barely discernable to the naked eye.
Click to expand...

It would only be forty feet per second until the molecules of iron reached an average density of one atom per micrometer, under the theory I'm currently exploring.

So a thinish spire that poofs? I can see how that might represent the kind of density I'm talking about here.
 
dtugg said:
1) How the **** were you "studying" dust without any samples for eight years?
2) You only received your sample a year or so ago? So what you are really saying is that there is no reason whatsoever to believe that it came from the WTC and that even if you prove that it is mostly iron it is in no way evidence that steel from the WTC was dustified.
3) A year would be much more than enough for any competent scientist to do a thorough analysis of the dust and complete a report.
Click to expand...

I studied the effect of catecholamines on adrenergic receptors for a full year before I obtained any adrenergic receptors. It took me an additional two years to obtain enough high quality samples for me to use for my dissertation work. It happens.

If you don't believe it's WTC dust, that is your deal. But plus you haven't seen but one tiny sliver of my results, so be patient.
 
WTC Dust said:
It's a metallic foam, is what it is. I was sorta planning to save this for the seminar, but whatevs.
Click to expand...

No. It's a cementic foam with a high content of an iron mineral. Sprayed onto the steel to protect it from heat. It's all over the place.
 
WTC Dust said:
I have produced almost nothing on the subject of 9/11 .... so far. But that will change.

I have written a book. Didn't I tell you about the book? It hasn't been accepted for publication because I haven't submitted it for publication, because I'm not big on that.

....
Click to expand...

WTC Dust said:
Why should I do easy calculations that other people can do and that are not relevant to the theory?

My theory isn't a quantitative theory. You don't hear me saying that 78.5% of the steel was turned into dust. You hear me say that the WTC was largely turned into dust, leaving the quantitation out of it.

.......
Click to expand...

WTC Dust said:
..........

This is compatible with me having almost no results in 9 years, wouldn't you say? Just one book that isn't my own research that even has a few errors. Not very much.
Click to expand...

DGM said:
OK now I'm stumped, Your going to have a seminar to show you have nothing? Are you hoping someone will bring you something?

:confused:
Click to expand...

Who says you can’t make a perpetual sucker machine.​
 
Newtons Bit said:
Why would this be a secret? This a pretty simple qualitative test. You should have led with this rather than bare assertions.

In any event, it sounds like the dust is attracted to whatever container the dust is in. You should be able to pick up the dust with the magnet.
Click to expand...

WTC Dust said:
Haven't done SEM. Plan to.

An ignorant, technician's application of mass spectroscopy to my samples would not reveal the full extent of the data. It would need to be a very highly knowledgeable technician, and there isn't anyone more knowledgeable about the dust than me (who isn't stuck in the publish or perish land).
Click to expand...

excaza said:
Hate to break it to you, but there is nothing scientific about anything you've said or done.
And yet, you can't even remotely come close to quantifying it. No mass composition, no focused pictures, no macroscopic pictures, no microscopic pictures, no crystallography, no SEM images, etc.

Nothing but your babbling.
Click to expand...

Newtons Bit said:
:confused::confused::confused:

An ignorant technician who follows SOP will get the exact same results as everyone else. Data is data.

You're not a real research scientist. You're just winging it. As far as I can tell, your only purpose in joining this forum and creating this thread is to garner information to help you research, since you're not sure what methods should be used.
Click to expand...

She wants to doctor the "dust" but is unsure how and if she can pull it off.​
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Why would you say I'm not a real research scientist?
Click to expand...


Right here.

You actually make a "comparison" with two completely different air crashes (by looking at photos only, obviously) and then declare that somehow the difference between these two photos proves that "there were no hijackings at all on 9/11"? Why would I not be as skeptical of your dust discourse as well?

That's some "scientific research" you got going there.
 
Björn Toulouse said:
Right here.

You actually make a "comparison" with two completely different air crashes (by looking at photos only, obviously) and then declare that somehow the difference between these two photos proves that "there were no hijackings at all on 9/11"? Why would I not be as skeptical of your dust discourse as well?

That's some "scientific research" you got going there.
Click to expand...

Not to mention the fact that to date, she has YET to back up her claim of the 2002 Memorial Service being interrupted.......

Imagine that.......:jaw-dropp:rolleyes:
 
Here's something I'm happy about. They're finally making good progress on rebuilding the WTC.
 
Last edited:
They're still using conductive materials. YOU HAVE TO STOP THEM! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
 
WTC Dust said:
The experiment I performed is a classic one, and I plan to repeat it at the seminar. You put a magnet on a string and still it from swinging and make sure no air flow is causing it to swing. Then you very delicately hold the chunk close to the magnet, and it pushes the magnet away.

Push and pull the chunk close to the magnet, and the magnet dances in time. :) Pretty sweet, huh?
Click to expand...


Of course you will have a completely neutral person who very delicately holds the chunk close to the magnet as the magnet is pushed away. You won't be anywhere near the experiment, especially with the chunk between yourself and the dangling magnet, right?
 
Björn Toulouse said:
Right here.

You actually make a "comparison" with two completely different air crashes (by looking at photos only, obviously) and then declare that somehow the difference between these two photos proves that "there were no hijackings at all on 9/11"? Why would I not be as skeptical of your dust discourse as well?

That's some "scientific research" you got going there.
Click to expand...

The lack of a tail section from a plane that supposedly crashed into the ground is suspicious.

It's not the only anomaly with the plane stories, but it is, all by itself, evidence that no hijackings occurred.

The other evidence is the first floor damage of the Pentagon and round "cut-out" hole in Section C.

The other evidence is the lack of a plane crash in the videos of 9:03AM.

Also, I'm busy proving that airplanes didn't destroy the World Trade Center, remember? It's not just one bit of evidence, merely one image. But even that image is enough to question the plane story from the beginning, which is the hijackings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom