• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
Curious. I hope you watch and ask questions live. I will be taking those questions during the seminar.
Click to expand...

Why would anyone expect you to be more forthcoming at your seminar than you are being here? I find it highly unlikely your behavior is going to be any different, and I'm not wasting my time or money to find out, you give me no reason to.

It's a very simple piece of data, and one that is essential to have before making any conclusion on the 'strangeness' of a material.

I find it curious that you're calling requests to substantiate your assertions 'bossing around.'
 
excaza said:
This doesn't have anything remotely to do with either the post you quoted or this entire thread. Nor is it relevant to your inability to produce quantitative data after 9 years.
Click to expand...

Isn't December 1st soon enough for you?
 
excaza said:
Why would anyone expect you to be more forthcoming at your seminar than you are being here? I find it highly unlikely your behavior is going to be any different, and I'm not wasting my time or money to find out, you give me no reason to.

It's a very simple piece of data, and one that is essential to have before making any conclusion on the 'strangeness' of a material.

I find it curious that you're calling requests to substantiate your assertions 'bossing around.'
Click to expand...

Well, you don't have to believe me right away. In fact, I expect that you will not. But at least you have to admit that I am taking your criticism and changing my strategy based on it. I am giving a seminar for the public. You all don't seem to like talking about one piece of data at a time. Don't know why.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Something you might like to keep in mind is that I am a patriot, and you will not be hearing me say that the United States government was behind the attacks of 9/11.

The people who say that still rile me up. The US government made many mistakes, but until I see some evidence that they did what was done, as opposed to a NORAD standdown that didn't happen or preplaced bombs in the WTC that also didn't happen, I'm not going to come out against the government.

At this point, I believe that 9/11 was an outside job, and that we really were attacked by terrorists, not our own government.
Click to expand...

But you must think that the US government is covering up the truth about three thousand murders. Let's say that your fantasy weapon was used by terrorists to destroy the WTC. We will ignore for a moment that the idea the such a weapon made it into the hands of terrorists is probably about as laughable as the idea that it exists in the first place. We are, after all talking about the most powerful and valuable device ever created.

Such a device would have surely left behind copious amounts of evidence of its use. I mean you and Judy Wood figured it all out by looking at some photos and some dust. So surely NIST figured it out too. But yet their report says impact damage and fire caused the WTC to collapse not that it was dustified by a DEW. Therefore, they are covering up the murders of three thousand people.
 
Last edited:
9/11 Chewy Defense said:
I wrote WTC Dust a question 4 pages ago, & still he/she ignores it. Maybe if I size it up & bold it I might get a response, or not.

How can steel turn into "dust", when it doesn't turn into a liquid first, then evaporate & then turn to dust?
Click to expand...

HOW it happened is more the expertise of Dr. Judy Wood. I can tell you what her opinions are, which I rate as very clever, insightful and likely correct, but why bother getting that information from me?

She's a Ph.D. materials scientist, and has an excellent collection of work on her eponymous website.
 
excaza said:
This doesn't have anything remotely to do with either the post you quoted or this entire thread. Nor is it relevant to your inability to produce quantitative data after 9 years.
Click to expand...

"A crummy commercial??? Son of a *****!" [/A Christmas Story Parody]
 
WTC Dust said:
HOW it happened is more the expertise of Dr. Judy Wood. I can tell you what her opinions are, which I rate as very clever, insightful and likely correct, but why bother getting that information from me?

She's a Ph.D. materials scientist, and has an excellent collection of work on her eponymous website.
Click to expand...

Your hero Judy Wood has no opinion about how it happened other than "DEW." The hag won't answer any questions about what type of energy, amount of energy used, source of the energy, where the weapon was located, ect. Because she can't. Because no such weapon exists. Sure she has a Ph.D but she is quite obviously mentally ill.
 
dtugg said:
But you must think that the US government is covering up the truth about three thousand murders. Let's say that your fantasy weapon was used by terrorists to destroy the WTC. We will ignore for a moment that the idea the such a weapon made it into the hands of terrorists is probably about as laughable as the idea that it exists in the first place. We are, after all talking about the most powerful and valuable device ever created.

Such a device would have surely left behind copious amounts of evidence of its use. I mean you and Judy Wood figured it all out by looking at some photos and some dust. So surely NIST figured it out too. But yet their report says impact damage and fire caused the WTC to collapse not that it was dustified by a DEW. Therefore, they are covering up the murders of three thousand people.
Click to expand...


I disagree. I think there is a darn good chance that nobody (or almost nobody) in the government has any idea of what actually happened.

All I can compare this to is myself. I did my homework throughout my school years. I went all the way with science until I got a Ph.D. and more. And I know how hard that I've worked to figure this out, and Judy's website shows her massive and sustained amount of effort for all these years, and neither of us fully figured out what happened. She is really close. I like the lady, and I sorta hope she's right, but if she isn't I will dump her like I dumped Simon Shack.

I want to find out who did it, and I don't think it was KSM or ObL. But show me proof that they had something to do with the WTC turning into dust, then I'll be interested. Telling me that they masterminded the plot to hijack airplanes that never actually flew is boring and many years old.
 
WTC Dust said:
I disagree. I think there is a darn good chance that nobody (or almost nobody) in the government has any idea of what actually happened.

All I can compare this to is myself. I did my homework throughout my school years. I went all the way with science until I got a Ph.D. and more. And I know how hard that I've worked to figure this out, and Judy's website shows her massive and sustained amount of effort for all these years, and neither of us fully figured out what happened. She is really close. I like the lady, and I sorta hope she's right, but if she isn't I will dump her like I dumped Simon Shack.

I want to find out who did it, and I don't think it was KSM or ObL. But show me proof that they had something to do with the WTC turning into dust, then I'll be interested. Telling me that they masterminded the plot to hijack airplanes that never actually flew is boring and many years old.
Click to expand...

The US government claims to know exactly what happened and exactly who did it and they certainly had much better access to the evidence than you or your hero. If they don't know what happened and who did it, they are lying and covering up the murders of three thousand people by pinning them on innocent people.
 
Last edited:
The government didn't notice someone launching a giant orbital laser cannon?
 
dtugg said:
Your hero Judy Wood has no opinion about how it happened other than "DEW." The hag won't answer any questions about what type of energy, amount of energy used, source of the energy, where the weapon was located, ect. Because she can't. Because no such weapon exists. Sure she has a Ph.D but she is quite obviously mentally ill.
Click to expand...

I barely know Judy Wood, but I feel for her. She has been so relentlessly reviled on the internet, when I find her a gentle talking and kind individual. She's dedicated the best years of her life to her work, and I gotta say again, she is the very best research scientist in the field of 9/11 studies.

I got into an argument with James Fetzer last year over whether or not he is "Judy Wood's biggest fan" as he seemed to repeat endlessly while insulting her and putting down her science. And I asked Judy who she thought her actual biggest fan is, and she said Dr. Morgan Reynolds. But Reynolds isn't a scientist. So then I asked her who scientifically supported her, and she said no one. Not one single scientist is on her side, or was at the time I asked the question maybe a year ago.

Since I support her, and since I am a scientist, I consider myself the world's #2 scientist on 9/11, since she is the best. I'd be happy to take 3rd, 4th or lower down spots, but no scientists are out there talking about energy weapons being used on 9/11, so I guess for now it is me. If there are some other scientists that you know of who support Judy Wood, tell me. Otherwise, I'm still the #2 scientist in the world on the subject of what destroyed the World Trade Center.
 
dtugg said:
The US government claims to know exactly what happened and exactly who did it and they certainly had much better access to the evidence than you or your hero. If they don't know what happened and who did it, they are lying and covering up the murders of three thousand people by pinning them on innocent people.
Click to expand...

Not lying. Incompetent. Bush wasn't that in love with scientists, you know. His administration will not be remembered for being filled with top level scientists.
 
WTC Dust said:
I barely know Judy Wood, but I feel for her. She has been so relentlessly reviled on the internet, when I find her a gentle talking and kind individual. She's dedicated the best years of her life to her work, and I gotta say again, she is the very best research scientist in the field of 9/11 studies.

I got into an argument with James Fetzer last year over whether or not he is "Judy Wood's biggest fan" as he seemed to repeat endlessly while insulting her and putting down her science. And I asked Judy who she thought her actual biggest fan is, and she said Dr. Morgan Reynolds. But Reynolds isn't a scientist. So then I asked her who scientifically supported her, and she said no one. Not one single scientist is on her side, or was at the time I asked the question maybe a year ago.

Since I support her, and since I am a scientist, I consider myself the world's #2 scientist on 9/11, since she is the best. I'd be happy to take 3rd, 4th or lower down spots, but no scientists are out there talking about energy weapons being used on 9/11, so I guess for now it is me. If there are some other scientists that you know of who support Judy Wood, tell me. Otherwise, I'm still the #2 scientist in the world on the subject of what destroyed the World Trade Center.
Click to expand...

Judy Wood may be a nice lady but that doesn't change the fact that she is a crazy hag. She explicitly refuses to state anything about the supposed DEW and her website is a disjointed bunch of complete nonsense.

If you want to state that she is a spot ahead of you as far as 9/11 researchers go, I would agree with you. You're dead last.
 
dtugg said:
Judy Wood may be a nice lady but that doesn't change the fact that she is a crazy hag. She explicitly refuses to state anything about the supposed DEW and her website is a disjointed bunch of complete nonsense.

If you want to state that she is a spot ahead of you as far as 9/11 researchers go, I would agree with you. You're dead last.
Click to expand...

Man, that hurt. I've got zero to show for 9 years of work, so you might be right. But it's not over, yet. They haven't found the real perpetrators, yet, so I still have a job to do.

I wish officials with more power than me would take over this job, but they are busy looking for Arabs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom