• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
I came here to talk about my work. The dust.
Click to expand...
Ok, good!

WTC Dust said:
The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.
Click to expand...
ElMondoHummus said:
That sounds an awful like the spray on fire resistant material. Have you got any information as to its composition?
Click to expand...
I'd really love to see what you've determined about the material's composition.
 
WTC Dust said:
That you misstate my views shows your case is weak. MONTHS of heavy fumes, and fumes that continued for an entire year, buddy. That ain't a "few hours". Explain.
Click to expand...

I thought you were here to talk about your dust?
 
tsig said:
Take a butter knife and hold it in your fingers at arms length with the point facing down. Drop it on a hard floor.

What happened?
Click to expand...

AMAZING. Nobody seems to be able to explicitly describe the phenomena.
 
GlennB said:
I also have dust samples. They wouldn't be very convincing as a plain DEW exhibit though, as the dust invariably has dog and cat hairs in it. But I reckon I could invent a pretty good CT around the hairs, probably involving a nifty phrase like macro-energetic resonance strings, and a mention of Steven Hawking.

Is there money to be made in this kind of thing?
Click to expand...

Very interesting. Are these dust samples from the WTC, or are you kidding me about your pet's hairballs being the dust, nyuck, nyuck?
 
alienentity said:
Dusty is a pathological liar. No question. She writes that she is not a Lackey of Dr Wood, yet her entire thesis so far is a carbon copy of Dr Wood's inane observations (don't tell me it's a coincidence ;))

AND, in her section 'About Me' it says 'Dr. Judy Wood is an American Hero. http://drjudywood.com'

Nothing about Dusty; just an accolade to her genius mentor, Dr Wood.

If you ain't Dr Wood's lackey, I think the word needs to be redefined.
Click to expand...


I'm only talking about Dr. Wood so much because you all keep asking me to answer questions out of order. So I'm sticking to my guns and talking about my own work, as opposed to hers.
 
WTC Dust said:
I'm only talking about Dr. Wood so much because you all keep asking me to answer questions out of order. So I'm sticking to my guns and talking about my own work, as opposed to hers.
Click to expand...

It's dust.

What is the composition of your dust?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
If you have such monumental evidence and data why are you presenting it on a site that is known for it's mockery and debunking of Truthers?
WHy are you presenting it on a small Internet Forum? Shouldn't you be getting this info out to people who can make a difference?

Why haven't you published your findings and gone to the media or law enforcement?
Click to expand...

Lots of questions, but none about my dust pic.
 
dtugg said:
What could we possibly say that has any relevence to your insane ideas other than point out that in nine years you still don't know its composition.
Click to expand...

The truth about my intentions is that I came here to test my theory. I have not published this, yet. You all might see that as potentially exciting.

I don't care how other researchers operate. I was always very slow to publish, I admit. Is it a failing on my part? Yes, in an atmosphere that emphasizes "publish or perish". It's not my style. Can you tell?

Dr. Wood is generous with her data. I'm stingy. I don't like to throw it all out there at once, and I am in the middle of formulating my strategy for presenting my findings. I have come to JREF for a debunking of my work, not that of Judy Wood.

And my work starts with where I found the dust. So what do you think of the pic?
 
WTC Dust said:
Lots of questions, but none about my dust pic.
Click to expand...

Oh, I'd love to talk about your dust. Earlier, you said:
WTC Dust said:
The dust samples are the strangest material you've ever seen, if you've seen it. Very, very crumbly. The interior structure is that of a foam that has somewhat solidified. And there's more than one distinct kind of dust.
Click to expand...
... and I replied:
ElMondoHummus said:
That sounds an awful like the spray on fire resistant material. Have you got any information as to its composition?
Click to expand...
... but sadly, this seems to have gone unnoticed. Well, since you yourself are raising the topic now, I'll be happy to start in. What is the dust made out of? What have you done to determine it's composition? Have you eliminated the SRFM material as a possibility?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom