Well, if you will insist on quoting Facts and supplying evidence ...
That thing got a Hemi?

You are making restrictions that I don't agree with. For instance, there was a heavy amount of fumes. If the dust that had previously been steel had left NYC in those fumes, the proportions of iron in the dust might be different if you scooped stuff off of the ground.
Unless you know of a paper I haven't found yet, nobody sampled the fumes that went high up into the atmosphere.
I hope you aren't saying that the Twin Towers were built in such a way that they had no resistance to horizontal forces. This would be stupid. Hurricanes happen, and those buildings withstood many storms during their years, although not a direct hit from a hurricane.
Wind presses against a building horizontally. Of course the Twin Towers were built with strong resistance to horizontal forces. To say anything else is bizarre.
Steel is a very specific thing. I do not claim the dust was steel. The steel of the World Trade Center became dust, almost entirely.
There were some pieces of the steel that used to be the WTC left over after the attacks, but most of the steel went away from the scene. It became a strange sort of dust. The dust itself isn't steel. It used to be steel, and concrete, and other things.
They didn't recover any toilets from the WTC, so the dust was partly ceramic material, but I wouldn't call it "toilet dust".
If one ton of steel gets dustified, would it not be correct to expect one ton of steel dust?
You are making restrictions that I don't agree with. For instance, there was a heavy amount of fumes. If the dust that had previously been steel had left NYC in those fumes, the proportions of iron in the dust might be different if you scooped stuff off of the ground.
Unless you know of a paper I haven't found yet, nobody sampled the fumes that went high up into the atmosphere.
Nope. You're wrong. Dust appeared before the building was moving fast. At the moment the building began to fail, dust appeared in large amounts.
Floors crashing down on one another would have had very little kinetic energy at that point.
The lobby of my apartment building filled up with dust and fumes before any of the WTC buildings were destroyed. Concrete floors crashing down has nothing to do with it.
1. Nothing about an airplane crash is sufficient to destroy a steel building.
2. Dust appeared where a steel building was moments before, at least 3 times on 9/11.
Unless you provide evidence, no sane person in the world is going to believe you.
Rust would form on iron microspheres I guess.
Can you confirm that in your own research you have seen none of the thermitic red-grey chips described by Neils Harrit and Steven Jones ?
dtugg: With your experimentations in clairvoyance, you really have nothing to say here. You might want to step back, maybe make a doctor's appointment and get that figured out.
The density (mass per volume) of iron/steel is much higher than that of 99% of all other dust costituents. If any sort of dust can be expected to stay close and settle to the ground quickly, its iron dust.
Unless you invoke magic whereby the heavy dust gets blown away and the light dust settles everywhere.
I think this is within the realm of things a biological/pharmaceutical researcher should grasp.
You failed to recognize that you were witnessing advanced technology on 9/11. This was your first mistake.
Psychic powers are not necessary to know that no sane person would believe such a ridiculous story as the WTC being dustified by some imaginary laser without some evidence. I know that you and Judy and a couple other people in the world believe that. But you guys are crazy.
Define this advanced technology. Unless you can do that, there is no reason for sane people to even consider it.
I'll bet a thousand dollars you don't have a medical degree.