The 'Homosexual Agenda'

[SpuriusMaximus]

Let's be fair..."traditional" family means a man, a women perhaps some kids and a critter or two (but not too many cats). So, gays, by definition, don't want a "traditional" family. I'm wondering how many of them "hates the traditional family".

Really? Because last I read Aristotle, the proper structure of a family was a man, a woman, and (at least) a slave. He doesn't even write the slave as being just a piece of property as the family, but as being an integral part of it.

I say let's return to that, if we're so concerned about never extending definitions. I mean, what are these conservatives doing allowing families without a slave? Granted owning people kinda went out of favour, but there seems to be no shortage of BDSM subbies, so I think something could still be worked out

 

[ponderingturtle]

Let's be fair..."traditional" family means a man, a women perhaps some kids and a critter or two (but not too many cats). So, gays, by definition, don't want a "traditional" family. I'm wondering how many of them "hates the traditional family".

BS. That is a lie invented in the 50's. It involves the couples parents, siblings and other extended relations. It is just the society got perverse in the 20th century and people stopped caring about their family very much. I mean it is shocking that people put their kids in daycare instead of with a relative to a very high percentage of the world.

So the "Traditional Family" is anything but traditional.

 

[SpuriusMaximus]

That's kinda my beef with the whole "everything should stop changing right now" mindset, be it people who act as if the world is about to end if a new form of family is also allowed, or grammar nazis, or whatever. Pretty much every one of them acts like the world was frozen and unchanging until they came onto the scene, or at least all the changes until then were good but any further changes are a frigging sacrilege. It strikes me as basically just meaning, "stop the world!!! _I_ can't possibly deal with any changes!!"

 

[bikerdruid]

I believe all humans are equal regardless of skin color and the bible does not say that black people are slaves. The bible does say that marriage is between a man and a woman, not between a man and a man or a dog and a man.

I am not even a believer but I have to defend the christian culture when it is under attack. Every time I see homosexuals marching they attack religion and western culture, they don't understand that they can live in peace just fine but they demand religious organizations to support their lifestyle and attack the rights of believers and conservatives.

Hate crimes law is one of the ways that the homosexual agenda is destroying the liberties of other people, even thinking negatively about the gays is a crime in their fantasy world.

this post is really quite over the top.
you claim to 'not be a believer', but still feel that christians are correct to fear gays.
how is my desire to live a normal life, without fear of losing my job (when i worked), of being evicted from my apartment, or abused verbally in the street, a threat to the christian culture?
if i chose to marry another man, how is that a threat to a christian family?
your fear is senseless.
btw...
currently, this queer's agenda is largely concerned with filling my woodshed before winter.

 

[Thunder]

I believe all humans are equal regardless of skin color and the bible does not say that black people are slaves..

a commonly held interpretaton of Genesis was that black skin was the mark of Cain and black skin was the curse put upon Esau.

I am not even a believer but I have to defend the christian culture when it is under attack. Every time I see homosexuals marching they attack religion .

simply marching, is an attack upon your faith? wow

the Bible also says that a child who curses his/her parents should be put to death. do you also follow this Biblical commandment?

Hate crimes law is one of the ways that the homosexual agenda is destroying the liberties of other people, even thinking negatively about the gays is a crime in their fantasy world.

hate crime laws protect EVERYONE, even White Christian heterosexuals.

 

[Elizabeth I]

I am not even a believer but I have to defend the christian culture when it is under attack.

A. How is the "Christian culture" under attack?
B. Why should you defend it?

Hate-speech thought-police homo stormtroopers is only a slight exaggeration.

Evidence?

 

[Thunder]

the Biblical ban on homosexuality is such a teeny tiny fraction of the laws set forth, and yet some Christians act like it was the #1 rule.

 

[Soapy Sam]

currently, this queer's agenda is largely concerned with filling my woodshed before winter.

So- you have no concern for the environment either?
I always suspected homosexuals caused that anthropophagous global warming.
They just managed to convince the Christians that it was the Jews.

 

[bikerdruid]

So- you have no concern for the environment either?
I always suspected homosexuals caused that anthropophagous global warming.
They just managed to convince the Christians that it was the Jews.

huh??
you made no sense at all.
i live at 56N. i live with wood heat. my woodshed keeps me alive and comfortable.
at -50C, it's a fairly simple matter.
plus....your intimation that homosexuals are anti-semitic is asinine.

 

[cwalner]

huh??
you made no sense at all.
i live at 56N. i live with wood heat. my woodshed keeps me alive and comfortable.
at -50C, it's a fairly simple matter.
plus....your intimation that homosexuals are anti-semitic is asinine.

bikerdruid, chill out. I do not think that Soapy Sam was entirely serious in his post

 

[cwalner]

the Biblical ban on homosexuality is such a teeny tiny fraction of the laws set forth, and yet some Christians act like it was the #1 rule.

It's not even in the top 10, and c'mon coveting is in the top 10. I mean how bad can homosexuality be if it did not make the top 10 but frikkin' coveting did.

 

[Undesired Walrus]

Let's be fair..."traditional" family means a man, a women perhaps some kids and a critter or two (but not too many cats). So, gays, by definition, don't want a "traditional" family.

The traditional family used to be highly untraditional.

 

[quadraginta]

Let's be fair..."traditional" family means a man, a women perhaps some kids and a critter or two (but not too many cats). So, gays, by definition, don't want a "traditional" family.

The traditional family used to be highly untraditional.

You're right. He left out housekeeper and/or endearing but cantankerous relative.

That ideal traditional family didn't get invented until Leave It To Beaver and Father Knows Best, and only lasted briefly even in TV-Land, until dysfunctional became popular. I expect the number of people who watched those sorts of shows while wishing their own families could be like that far outnumbered the ones who saw theirs being portrayed.

 

[bikerdruid]

huh??
you made no sense at all.
i live at 56N. i live with wood heat. my woodshed keeps me alive and comfortable.
at -50C, it's a fairly simple matter.
plus....your intimation that homosexuals are anti-semitic is asinine.

i obviously missed the irony in the comment.
after reviewing some of SS comments, i should have realized this.
my apologies for taking things too seriously.

 

[Soapy Sam]

We really do need that "I'm yanking your chain" smiley.
No sweat, BD.
You are due west of me, by the way.
See here- http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/distance_from_hamilton_scotland_to_hamilton_canada

 

[Ivor the Engineer]

<snip>

this queer's agenda is largely concerned with filling my woodshed before winter.

I've never heard it called that before.

 

[Thunder]

whats the agenda again?

 

[Skeptic]

The next goal on the agenda will be to push "experimentation" and bisexuality as far as it can go... Total conversion will not be possible, but it is in the Gay Agenda to push those barriers with Queer Theory as far as they can go.

Yeah, because when *I* decide who I am sexually attracted to, the *first thing* I do is check what the latest "queer theory" textbook says. Wouldn't want to be out of touch and behind the times, would I.

 

[arthwollipot]

whats the agenda again?

1. Marriage equality.
2. ???
3. Profit!

 

[Toke]

Would the gay agenda be something like my uncles wedding*, where the priest were gay and had a daughter by inheritance from his husband who had her with a lesbian couple?

*straith, to a priest(es)