WTC dust

[dtugg]

My god, dtugg! What is it with this clairvoyance thing you've got going on?

Stop claiming you know what is inside the minds of other people. It makes you sounds spooky.

See my above post.

Scene 1: Steel buildings.
Scene 2: Dust.

WTF happened? Don't tell me thermite, and don't tell me planes. GO!

Building collapsed due to impact damage, fire, and gravity and turned drywall, ceiling tiles, insulation, ect, to dust. There is no evidence whatsoever that steel turned to dust thus there is no reason to explain it

After you do this exercise, you'll see why I'm talking about Judy Wood and asking you all to debunk her science. She's talking about advanced technology, but she's making sense. I'd like to see her science picked apart, and you all are the premier debunkers, so go ahead.

Unless she explains how the steel was supposedly turned to dust (which she hasn't), she has no science whatsoever.

 

[dtugg]

You're ignoring that I said it was an estimate. Those weren't hard numbers.

You said the floors were made of steel beams. They weren't. Therefore, it is established beyond any doubt whatsoever that you are ignorant of how the WTC was constructed.

Do you think sane people should listen to what a person who is demonstrably ignorant about the construction of the WTC says about its destruction?

 

[WTC Dust]

Fine.

Now, were you at Broadway and Liberty?
Broadway and Cortlandt?
Broadway and John?
Broadway and Fulton?
Broadway and Veasey?

Which one were you at? Those are the intersections that GZ would have been visable.

You said Broadway. What intersection?

Why do so many of you persist in asking me the same questions over and over again. I walked the length of Broadway, which means I was at all of the intersections nearby the WTC at one point on Day 3 after the attacks.

I saw some pieces sticking up, but they were not located where WTC 1 and WTC 2 previously stood. The pieces sticking up I saw were on the north side of Ground Zero, kinda leaning over. You could stand up on these little ledges they have on Cedar Street and see a bit more of the mess, but still couldn't see any part of a pile where WTC 1 and 2 stood.

 

[WTC Dust]

So, why would you be North of Canal St, looking for Ground Zero?

East Houston St? Up by Hamilton Fish Park?

I walked from Houston Street to Wall Street. When I got near Ground Zero, I started looking at the crime scene.

 

[grandmastershek]

Has anyone presented evidence of a Death star capable of melting the Towers yet? No? Oh well.

 

[WTC Dust]

Decaying body parts, drywall, mold, you name it......Yeah, GZ stunk. Point?

Did you smell it?

 

[WTC Dust]

You said that "research scientist" is what your pay-check says. Now you say your primary field is 9/11 and independent. I'm confused.

I haven't earned any money from my 9/11 research. I earn money from other research, but that just pays the bills. It's not what drives me.

 

[DGM]

Has anyone presented evidence of a Death star capable of melting the Towers yet? No? Oh well.

It didn't "melt" them it turned them to dust! Get your facts straight!

 

[WTC Dust]

Yeah, especially considering I fight fire full time, but just tis year, I have published 4 papers in respectable journals about fire science. One on fuel loads in highrise buildings, and why they must stay as designed.

But hey, he could be working on a HUGE 10,000 page paper....

OK. I'm hearing ya. But if you had evidence that an airplane crash didn't destroy the World Trade Center, how would you go about publishing it?

Would you do like Steven Jones did and publish in a pay-per-paper open source journal and call it "peer-reviewed" to the high heavens?

Even Dr. Wood has exactly zero peer reviewed papers, although she's sued on behalf of the US government and taken it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

[Thunder]

you know, I breathed in the WTC dust since 9-15-01.

it didn't taste like steel, or smell like steel.

 

[WTC Dust]

I already told you. But I guess I'll say it again. She found supposed anomalies in images of the WTC. She thinks they look similar to supposed anomalies photographed by some fraud named John Hutchinson. That is basically it. She has not even attempted to string any of this into a coherent theory.

You are somewhat getting close, but what you fail to mention is the new physics she discusses.

 

[WTC Dust]

you know, I breathed in the WTC dust since 9-15-01.

it didn't taste like steel, or smell like steel.

I thought you were going to ignore me? Silly Thunder.

So, what did it smell like to you? Many people had a hard time describing the smell.

 

[TJM]

Even Dr. Wood has exactly zero peer reviewed papers, although she's sued on behalf of the US government and taken it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

One of the all-time epic truther fails.

 

[dtugg]

OK. I'm hearing ya. But if you had evidence that an airplane crash didn't destroy the World Trade Center, how would you go about publishing it?

Would you do like Steven Jones did and publish in a pay-per-paper open source journal and call it "peer-reviewed" to the high heavens?

Even Dr. Wood has exactly zero peer reviewed papers, although she's sued on behalf of the US government and taken it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Attempt to get it published in a real journal. If you can't (this would give sane people some pause, but surely not you), which is almost definitely the case, well you can do like your hero Judy Wood and make a website. This is not ideal, but it is better than sitting of evidence of a massive conspiracy. Something tells me that the reason nobody has seen your "research" is because it doesn't exist.

 

[DGM]

You are somewhat getting close, but what you fail to mention is the new physics she discusses.

I know I've been out of school for over 30 years but, "new physics"? Got some info on this?

 

[dtugg]

You are somewhat getting close, but what you fail to mention is the new physics she discusses.

What new physics? The Hutchinson Effect? lol

 

[WTC Dust]

If 1+2=3, why haven't you addressed ANY of the photos that I have provided?

If you act in ways that I find unpleasant, don't be surprised if I ignore you. You might try politeness.

 

[WTC Dust]

One of the all-time epic truther fails.

Her case made it all the way to the US Supreme Court, and Dr. Wood's work up to that point is on record. I call that a win.

 

[dtugg]

Her case made it all the way to the US Supreme Court, and Dr. Wood's work up to that point is on record. I call that a win.

Anybody can get a case to the Supreme Court, even if it is laughably insane and totally without merit like your hero Judy Wood's. All you have to do is keep filing appeals. The court system is another thing you are obviously completely ignorant about.

 

[WTC Dust]

Attempt to get it published in a real journal. If you can't (this would give sane people some pause, but surely not you), which is almost definitely the case, well you can do like your hero Judy Wood and make a website. This is not ideal, but it is better than sitting of evidence of a massive conspiracy. Something tells me that the reason nobody has seen your "research" is because it doesn't exist.

I'm actually working on getting my results published, so stay tuned.

Science isn't always easy, especially when you're going against the prevailing paradigm. What's more important than early publishing is getting the right answer.

Dr. Wood's book should come out soon. That will be good. Perhaps my articles will see the light some day. The thing about not doing 9/11 as a profession is that I'm not caught up in the "publish or perish" mentality.
I'm in it to win it, and eventually that does involve publishing articles.