• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How WTC 7 was pulled down

You all should be in awe of the fantastic exotic technology the US has. Must be all those alien spacecraft we reverse engineered in Area 51. Just wait until we decide to bring that stuff out of hiding and instead of using it on secret inside jobs like 911, use it to take over the world. (cue evil laughter)
 
Ummm, if something is pulled down, doesn't that imply that they used cables and yanked on it rather using than some Steven Jones kookaid inspired concoction?
 
I'm sorry but I am truly baffled by the notion that an educated person could believe this idea. The amount of energy needed to instantly vaporize large quantities of steel is enormous. I can't imagine a substance that could be applied to steel in order to do this. Or maybe I can?

Forget thermite, the best I can imagine is a cold fusion spray on film, that when exposed to radiation or some energy source would instantly react, vaporizing the steel. Maybe?

What I'm asking is can anyone else at least take this "fantasy" down a notch to "science fiction"? At least make it plausible on some level.
 
Trojan said:
Could you perhaps produce any photo of a thermite cutter charge of the type you allege to have been used or so gel nanothermite sprayed on any structure? it would be interesting to see if these items exist and function outside of the truther world.
Click to expand...

You have to visit the references in the links I provide in my article http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm . Evidently sol gel nanothermite exists as development of same is paid for by US tax payers. I do not refer to thermite cutter charges in my article, so pls do not suggest I allege anything of that sort.
I just try to imagine what could produce free fall of the upper, visible part/mass of WTC7 during 2.25 seconds, i.e. that all supports of it are removed allowing free fall for 2.25 seconds, i.e. the whole upper part/mass of WTC7 is dropping or being pulled by gravity without anything stopping it for 2.25 seconds, i.e. anything below the upper part/mass must have been removed! Fast! Instantanesously! It evaporated. How could it be done?

And why does NIST suggest in its report that this upper part/mass deforms while dropping? Gravity force does not produce any deformations at free fall! All the gravity force does is to produce free fall!

KISS! Keep It Simple, Stupid!
 
Heiwa said:
You have to visit the references in the links I provide in my article http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm . Evidently sol gel nanothermite exists as development of same is paid for by US tax payers. I do not refer to thermite cutter charges in my article, so pls do not suggest I allege anything of that sort.
I just try to imagine what could produce free fall of the upper, visible part/mass of WTC7 during 2.25 seconds, i.e. that all supports of it are removed allowing free fall for 2.25 seconds, i.e. the whole upper part/mass of WTC7 is dropping or being pulled by gravity without anything stopping it for 2.25 seconds, i.e. anything below the upper part/mass must have been removed! Fast! Instantanesously! It evaporated. How could it be done?
And why does NIST suggest in its report that this upper part/mass deforms while dropping? Gravity force does not produce any deformations at free fall! All the gravity force does is to produce free fall!

KISS! Keep It Simple, Stupid!
Click to expand...

Well keep trying to "imagine" this because your the only one that said it happened.
Stop trying to fool people that are actually capable of reading and understanding the report. Stick to children and "truthers".
 
Heiwa said:
You have to visit the references in the links I provide in my article http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm . Evidently sol gel nanothermite exists as development of same is paid for by US tax payers. I do not refer to thermite cutter charges in my article, so pls do not suggest I allege anything of that sort.
I just try to imagine what could produce free fall of the upper, visible part/mass of WTC7 during 2.25 seconds, i.e. that all supports of it are removed allowing free fall for 2.25 seconds, i.e. the whole upper part/mass of WTC7 is dropping or being pulled by gravity without anything stopping it for 2.25 seconds, i.e. anything below the upper part/mass must have been removed! Fast! Instantanesously! It evaporated. How could it be done?

And why does NIST suggest in its report that this upper part/mass deforms while dropping? Gravity force does not produce any deformations at free fall! All the gravity force does is to produce free fall!

KISS! Keep It Simple, Stupid!
Click to expand...

You think that evaporating still instantaneously is simple? Oh my.

Furthermore I dont understand this if your computer model or pizzabox experiment doesnt get the same result as NIST you end up calling them liars.

As someone stated earlier in the thread if you make two cars out of two matchboxes and crash them into each other they wont deform. Does that mean that every car crash is faked or an insidejob? No. The methods used to simulate the crash was wrong.
 
Heiwa said:
... , i.e. anything below the upper part/mass must have been removed! Fast! Instantanesously! It evaporated. How could it be done?
...
KISS! Keep It Simple, Stupid!
Click to expand...
The vacuum weapon vacuumed it away. Great, you have an imaginary weapon to go with your fantasy conclusion. Do you lack knowledge in structures and physics to make you create stupid ideas of a vacuum weapon that evaporates steel and sucks away the building, into the ground?

The directed beam vacuum weapon. DBVW - as simple as it gets
 
Last edited:
Heiwa, I put thermite in a pizza-box tower and all it did was set it on fire. Now what?
 
3bodyproblem said:
I'm sorry but I am truly baffled by the notion that an educated person could believe this idea. The amount of energy needed to instantly vaporize large quantities of steel is enormous. I can't imagine a substance that could be applied to steel in order to do this. Or maybe I can?

Forget thermite, the best I can imagine is a cold fusion spray on film, that when exposed to radiation or some energy source would instantly react, vaporizing the steel. Maybe?

What I'm asking is can anyone else at least take this "fantasy" down a notch to "science fiction"? At least make it plausible on some level.
Click to expand...

911 conspiracy theorists are usually not well educated and will believe anything except the truth.
 
how about we drop a small house of cards on a larger house of cards and just have some pizza.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom