Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
William Parcher said:
Here we go. I just made this after finding another Crew cast. Besides looking slightly different than the press photo cast it appears painted or glazed. It came from Swastika Steve's blog.

You can see the double ball and other similar features. It looks like somebody made some modifications to a Wallace footprint. That does make sense because Jerry Crew was at the Ray Wallace worksite.


[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/93b52565.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

How do you know that Wallace didn't pick up the "double ball" feature from the Crew print?
 
Skeptical Greg said:
Do you think it is more likely the Crew print was made by a Bigfoot ?
Click to expand...

Of course not. Óðinn/Gigantofootecus does not believe that Bigfoot exists.


Óðinn said:
How do you know that Wallace didn't pick up the "double ball" feature from the Crew print?
Click to expand...


That's the wrong question and only one that a puddinghead Bigfoot believer would ask; not you. The real question is whether Rant Mullins did the carvings for Ray Wallace. Are we really talking about Mullins Alderfoots?
 
"Bigfoot Cousins Claimed in Many Countries" by Benjamin Radford.

While Bigfoot is by far the best-known of mysterious bipedal creatures said to inhabit the world's wilds, it is far from the only one. Many countries and cultures have stories of hairy, feral man-like creatures.

Canada's Sasquatch
Nepal's Yeti
Australia's Yowie
Indonesia's Orang Pendek
Click to expand...

What about Russia's Almas or Almasty?
 
Well, if that's your snobby elitist criteria, then fine, okay, sure. ;)

But there are certainly stories about British bigfoot(s).

The last one has a picture of what looks like an Australopithecus wearing a furry diaper. If that doesn't constitute evidence of the kind required to get into the "club", then I don't know what to tell you. :D
 
Last edited:
William Parcher said:
That's the wrong question and only one that a puddinghead Bigfoot believer would ask; not you. The real question is whether Rant Mullins did the carvings for Ray Wallace. Are we really talking about Mullins Alderfoots?
Click to expand...
It's a perfectly legit question. The Crew prints were superior, IMO, than the Wallace feet. IOW, Wallace likely didn't create them. Yet they share the double ball feature. Whutup with that? Coincidence? They pre-dated the Wallace feet that we have identified so maybe Mullins is the true inventor of bigfoot. At any rate, Wallace doesn't appear to be the inventor of the double balled bigfoot, IMO. :D
 
Óðinn said:
The Crew prints were superior, IMO, than the Wallace feet.
Click to expand...

1) Prints as in plural? You know of more than one Crew print?

2) Superior in what way? They look more like a Bigfoot made them?


IOW, Wallace likely didn't create them. Yet they share the double ball feature. Whutup with that? Coincidence? They pre-dated the Wallace feet that we have identified so maybe Mullins is the true inventor of bigfoot. At any rate, Wallace doesn't appear to be the inventor of the double balled bigfoot, IMO. :D
Click to expand...

The print in the 1930 photo bears a strong resemblance to what we call a Wallace Alderfoot. It may even have a double-ball. I think it's shaped like an upside-down bowling pin. It has an unnatural symmetry.

I don't know if there is evidence or testimony (from his family) that Wallace certainly did carve wooden feet as opposed to received them from Mullins. I think Wallace was not sharing every detail (if any) of his Bigfoot hoaxing with his family. From what I gather, he died without ever confessing to anyone about his hoaxing. It was after he died that his family found the wooden feet.
 
The Wallace brothers grew up with Mullins. Shorty Wallace was probably just as involved as Ray was. They were part and parcel of a hoaxing culture that dated back at least to 1924. Bluff Creek was just another place for them to mess around, until a wife of one of the workers got excited, and Jerry the Nerd wasn't in on the joke. One summer I worked in a remote area on a survey crew and it was just like that, playing jokes, screwing around. Whoever was the most gullible was gonna be in for the most pranks.
 
Last edited:
Here's a good one, Matthew Moneymaker wants to criminalize hoaxes.
A Pile of Good Arguments for a Federal Statute
Prohibiting Hoaxes targeting Televison News or Radio News Broadcasters
Click to expand...
The spelling and the logic and the capitalization are all pretty crappy, but at least it's long, boring and rambling, so maybe no one will read it.
Oops, when I tried to quote the article, it broke my irony meter. Oops, there go my arrogance meter and my BS meter, and my self-absorbed meter and my pot/kettle meter.
Well, my cut and paste still works:
Here's a wonder of modern logic:
If it is illegal for a government player to inject stories into the press by court order, then logically it should be illegal for any player to inject stories into the press by trickery.
Click to expand...
No wonder this guy doesn't practice law.
 
Last edited:
parnassus said:
Matthew Moneymaker wants to criminalize hoaxes.
Click to expand...


8a31dd39.gif
 
What's the brown thing below his left fingers?

And be sure to notice the HUGE cross BG is wearing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom