Ah, so the tactic is not to beat a newcomer to exhaustion, but to make use of mockery and sarcasm and be as rude as you possibly can in the hope that he/she will go away. Well done...
Weren't you convinced as a child that you had visions of an earlier life, and weren't you "informed" during a ouija session when you were 15 that you had been Prince Charles Edward Stewart? Or are you saying that despite all this you were skeptical of anything paranormal or spiritual?
Yes, that is so... But the memory of such visions only made any kind of sense much later. In our ever present disbelief, it does take a lot to start believing in what is beyond the grasp of our day by day reality. I am no different.
Didn't you write the following?
Quote:
As you know, practically since childhood I have lived under the strong impression and assumption that I once was whom I have shared with you as having been... This has held the strongest of grips upon me ever since I can remember. I have also carried with me, almost throughout my entire lifetime, a craving desire to somehow put right what in previous times I may have done wrong.
Yes, again this is so... But can you point these exact words as having been said by me in this forum?
Concerning evidence:
1. Have you ever read and analysed Dr Ian Stevenson's work concerning children who remember details of lifetimes other than their current one? He purposely directed his studies to children precisely because they are less likely to be influenced by external factors.
2. In the case of Jacqueline Pool, the medium hit 129 out of 130 details of the murder, and you want to counter-argument this by saying that it was random chance?
3. Concerning my question about the dual-slit experiment and the wave-particle effect brought about by the intent of observation on the part of the observer, have you ever watched a film-documentary called "What the "bleep" do we know?" It is quantum-physicists who point this out, not me.
You have all focussed on the weak points, but fail to comment on those that are not, and clearly avoid any objectiveness in your argumentations, rather preferring to just attempt to ridicule. Hardly surprising that anyone who might come here with views that are different to your own should find any desire to remain...
You say that what was said to me concerning my wife's pregnancy and Lady Di's death was either random chance or a lucky guess and claim that it means the case is closed? Sorry, not quite convincing enough to me who experienced such events as well as so many others...
