• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

'What about building 7'?

Status
Not open for further replies.
cooperman said:
Well, your barbecue must be different to mine. I can put my hand above the coals. I am not so keen to do it when it is flaming.

I am struggling to determine if you are being serious. We are talking about floor beams reaching 600 degrees EIGHTY minutes after the fire was extinguished in that area.
Click to expand...

Video shows WTC7 blazing away right up to the moment of collapse.
 
Firstly, I am not proposing a theory. I am simply demonstrating, with ample evidence, that the NIST fire simulation is a fabrication.
Click to expand...

So why haven't any of the engineers, or firefighters with relevant qualifications, experience and expertise noticed it is a fabrication or are the all 'in on it'?

It always amazes me that only unqualified and inexperienced Internet users ever spot these things.
 
cooperman said:
Heat soak and radiation is not what NIST claim happened. Will you please address why they have simulations showing fire around column 79 at 5pm?
Click to expand...

It's showing radiant heat.

When do you plan on submitting your analysis to a respectable journal? Ever?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
So why haven't any of the engineers, or firefighters with relevant qualifications, experience and expertise noticed it is a fabrication or are the all 'in on it'?

It always amazes me that only unqualified and inexperienced Internet users ever spot these things.
Click to expand...

Ae911truth have noticed. The clue is in their name. They have engineers.

You could spot the fabrication too if you actually read it. I made it even easer for you be posting the fire simulation picture.
 
cooperman said:
Why would I need a journal in order to point out a simple fact that the fire simulation is a fabrication?

Greening, a respected scientist, has been completely ignored by NIST when he sent them legitimate concerns. What chance do I have?
Click to expand...

Greening, a respected CHEMIST, would not be publishing in a fire science journal. Unless he was discussing chemical fires.

Secondly, you're argument is flawed, because NIST is not showing the SEAT of the fire, it is showing HEAT.

Lastly, I am not asking you to contact NIST, I am asking when you plan on sending your findings to a JOURNAL??? I can reccomend some if need be.
 
cooperman said:
Off topic. I am not discussing CD. This is about concerns with the NIST report.
Click to expand...
You think it was CD that did in WTC 7, not fire. Why hide your fantasy?

Chris Sarns, when will he publish his work in real journal? Is Chris in on the money Gage is brining in by telling lies like this?

Can you explain your lies and failure with respect to One Meridian Plaza?

Chris Sarns made up the fire study he did and based it on flames he can see. What is Chris? An engineer? What? Just a truther?

When will you publish your findings? You think CD did it, that is a fantasy.
 
Last edited:
cooperman said:
In that area?
Click to expand...

One more time:

1. Heat on numerous floors, led to expansion of the steel in many locations, especially on floors 8-14.
2. This expansion (and contraction) lead to a combination of weakening and sheering forces, that caused BREAKAGE of the connections etc...
3. These breakages led to the internal collapsing of numerous floors, but in particular a stretch of floors from the 13th down until the 5th floor.
4. The loss of these floors left column 79 unsupported for a span of 8-9 floors, which led to the buckling of column 79, which was the initiating event of the total collapse.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6409136#post6409136
Click to expand...
 
cooperman said:
Ae911truth have noticed. The clue is in their name. They have engineers.

You could spot the fabrication too if you actually read it. I made it even easer for you be posting the fire simulation picture.
Click to expand...

The best press Truth can get is being called Crazies. http://sfist.com/2010/02/19/911_truth_crazies_enthusiasts_retur.php

They have published nothing, the reason this was not published, the BS you posted, is it was made up nonsense by a non-engineer, a paranoid conspiracy theorist truther. Made it up and you think the presenters of lies, Gage has it, it is backed with real effort?

You were fooled by Gage. Check it out, Chris Sarns has no expertise, he made up his study. Gage uses the hearsay to fool people like you and all your truther buddies, Miragememories, Tin Foil Timothy, ULTIMA1, Heiwa, Homeland Insurgency, roundhead, and more, who join you on the fantasy train of Gage.

Why have the engineers at AE failed to publish this? Because it is nonsense, made up claptrap which fooled you. They did send this to NIST already, so you can save your time. NIST knows AE are a group with crazy ideas. Gage lies, you believe him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom