The "border fence" is just a non-starter as far as I'm concerned.
Would you like to enumerate your specific reasons from believing that? Because that solution looks pretty good to me, and I'm more than willing to defend my reasons.
I think Penn & Teller already handled this issue pretty well
Oh let's not just pass it off to Penn & Teller. After, Penn & Teller are basically just comics … and rather filthy mouthed ones at that. And a lot of what they believe is sheer nonsense. Even lies.
For example, fence proponents don't want just 700 miles of discontinuous fence, as P&T would make you think. P&T note what Bush (who only got dragged into building any fence) proposed, then quote people saying things like "The U.S. Mexico border is 2000 miles. It'll have bigger holes than a [NSFW]" as if that's supposed to prove something. But that's not what fence advocates really want built. They want a continuous fence system, border to border. Nor is what was built even similar to what we were told would be built with the money. For example, the bill called for 300 miles of double fencing. You want to know the total number of miles of double fence that was actually built? Just 34 miles (
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=37025 ). And DHS was so bold about it's lies that in 2009, Napolitano claimed ((
http://www.chicagodefender.com/article-6714-napolitano-pronounces-us-border-more-secure-now.html ) that 600 miles of fencing had been built
and that as a result our border was more secure … so secure that she said it's time to move towards giving the millions of illegals already in the country citizenship. Both are lies. Neither 600 miles of fence was built, nor is the border more secure now then it was in 2005.
But let's get back to P&T. In their videos, they hire a group of illegals to build what they claim is a sample stretch of the proposed "wall" … and then have those immigrants test this wall and they bust through it in three to five minutes. But the fence they build is nothing like what fence proponents actually want built … or even the fences that were supposed to be built under the Bush law. P&T are baldfaced liars when they state in their video that the one layer wall they had the illegals build is "just like the walls that … snip … the government proposed".
Now, curiously, they mention the border "wall" (it's actually a multi-fence system) in San Diego that was built by (they claim) illegals. What they don't mention is the San Diego fence system that stretches 14 miles has been VERY effective. In that stretch of the border where the system was built they were catching over 100,000 illegals
a year (with hundreds of thousands more making it past the guards) prior to the fence. After they built the fence system, the number apprehended dropped to just 5000 a year with very few actually getting past the three fence system (
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5326083). Fences do work.
Again, I'm more than willing to debate YOU on the efficacy of a properly designed and constructed fence/wall system. But don't hide behind these lying comics.